• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人在神经和神经肌肉疾病中的坐姿平衡评估的系统回顾。

A systematic review of adults` sitting balance assessments in neurological and neuromuscular condition.

出版信息

Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2020 Jul;25(3):163-168. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2020.3.20190592.

DOI:10.17712/nsj.2020.3.20190592
PMID:32683409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8015474/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To find out new assessment tools for sitting, in patients with neurological and neuromuscular conditions, to be recommended for rehabilitation practice locally in Saudi Arabia and internationally.

METHODS

Four databases were used: PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were articles published between the years 2009-2019; sitting, not standing or walking; assessment not intervention; published in English and studies on adults only. Exclusion criteria were any assessment that measures the standing/walking ability or has items for that, and studies that include pediatric or adolescent or both.

RESULTS

Ten articles met our criteria including 464 patients and divided into 3 main neurological conditions (stroke, SCI, and MS). One assessment (Function in Sitting Test) showed promising potential being implemented with both stroke and multiple sclerosis, Cronbach`s alpha, alpha were 0.91 and 0.98 indicating high internal consistency. It was used with SCI patients, however, no access was available to include this study in this review.

CONCLUSION

This review indicates an extension of what was carried out by previous systematic reviews with neurological conditions. It seems that Function in Sitting Test is the most frequent assessment in this review with multiple neurological conditions (stroke, MS and SCI) with high internal consistency and high quality studies according to available data. However, this review showed that there is an absence of evidence for individuals with brain injury and muscular dystrophy. Further work needs to be carried out to address such groups of patients to extend the choices that clinicians can use in rehabilitation sittings.

摘要

目的

寻找适用于沙特阿拉伯和国际康复实践的新的神经和神经肌肉疾病患者坐姿评估工具。

方法

使用了四个数据库:PubMed、Web of Science、Ovid Medline 和 Cochrane。纳入标准为 2009-2019 年发表的文章;坐姿,非站立或行走;评估而非干预;以英语发表且仅研究成年人。排除标准为任何评估站立/行走能力或包含该能力的评估以及包括儿科或青少年或两者的研究。

结果

有 10 篇文章符合我们的标准,包括 464 名患者,并分为 3 种主要神经疾病(中风、SCI 和多发性硬化症)。一种评估工具(坐姿功能测试)显示出有潜力应用于中风和多发性硬化症,Cronbach`s alpha、alpha 分别为 0.91 和 0.98,表明具有较高的内部一致性。它也被用于 SCI 患者,但无法获得纳入本综述的这项研究的数据。

结论

本综述表明,它扩展了先前针对神经疾病进行的系统综述。似乎坐姿功能测试是本次综述中最常见的评估工具,适用于多种神经疾病(中风、多发性硬化症和 SCI),具有较高的内部一致性和高质量研究,根据现有数据。然而,本综述表明,对于脑损伤和肌肉萎缩症患者,证据不足。需要进一步开展工作,以满足这些患者群体的需求,为临床医生在康复治疗中提供更多选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0a8/8015474/ca11fbde9744/Neurosciences-25-163-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0a8/8015474/ca11fbde9744/Neurosciences-25-163-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0a8/8015474/ca11fbde9744/Neurosciences-25-163-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review of adults` sitting balance assessments in neurological and neuromuscular condition.成人在神经和神经肌肉疾病中的坐姿平衡评估的系统回顾。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2020 Jul;25(3):163-168. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2020.3.20190592.
2
A systematic review of the effectiveness of task-specific rehabilitation interventions for improving independent sitting and standing function in spinal cord injury.一项关于特定任务康复干预对改善脊髓损伤患者独立坐立功能有效性的系统评价。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 May;41(3):254-266. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1350340. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
3
Assessment of sexual function in women with neurological disorders: A review.评估神经障碍女性的性功能:综述。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jul;61(4):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
4
Non-pharmacological interventions for spasticity in adults: An overview of systematic reviews.成人痉挛的非药物干预措施:系统评价概述。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Jul;62(4):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
Current state of balance assessment during transferring, sitting, standing and walking activities for the spinal cord injured population: A systematic review.脊髓损伤人群在转移、坐、站和行走活动中的平衡评估现状:系统评价。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Jan;43(1):10-23. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1481692. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
6
Effects of Virtual Reality Therapy on Gait and Balance Among Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.虚拟现实疗法对脊髓损伤患者步态和平衡的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 May;34(5):375-388. doi: 10.1177/1545968320913515. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
7
Clinical Instruments for Measuring Unsupported Sitting Balance in Subjects with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.用于测量脊髓损伤患者无支撑坐位平衡的临床仪器:一项系统综述。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Spring;24(2):177-193. doi: 10.1310/sci17-00027. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
8
Analysis of Postural Control in Sitting by Pressure Mapping in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Cord Injury and Friedreich's Ataxia: A Case Series Study.多系统硬化症、脊髓损伤和弗里德里希共济失调患者坐姿压力分布的姿势控制分析:病例系列研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 13;20(22):6488. doi: 10.3390/s20226488.
9
Development and validation of the Function In Sitting Test in adults with acute stroke.成人急性脑卒中患者坐姿功能测试的制定与验证。
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010 Sep;34(3):150-60. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181f0065f.
10
A systematic review of adults' sitting balance assessments in neurological and neuromuscular conditions.对神经和神经肌肉疾病中成人坐位平衡评估的系统评价。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2021 Jan;26(1):107-108. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2021.1.20200131.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of adults' sitting balance assessments in neurological and neuromuscular conditions.对神经和神经肌肉疾病中成人坐位平衡评估的系统评价。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2021 Jan;26(1):107-108. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2021.1.20200131.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the function in sitting test among non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤非卧床个体坐立测试功能的可靠性和有效性。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Nov;43(6):846-853. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1605749. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
2
Reliability of dynamic sitting balance tests and their correlations with functional mobility for wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injury.慢性脊髓损伤轮椅使用者动态坐姿平衡测试的可靠性及其与功能移动性的相关性
J Orthop Translat. 2014 Aug 7;3(1):44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2014.07.003. eCollection 2015 Jan.
3
Clinical Instruments for Measuring Unsupported Sitting Balance in Subjects with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.
用于测量脊髓损伤患者无支撑坐位平衡的临床仪器:一项系统综述。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Spring;24(2):177-193. doi: 10.1310/sci17-00027. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
The Italian version of the Trunk Impairment Scale: development and psychometric properties.躯干功能障碍量表的意大利语版本:编制及心理测量学特性。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Aug;53(4):516-520. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04371-4. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
6
Reliability and validity of the function in sitting test in nonambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症非行走个体坐位测试功能的信度和效度
Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Dec;39(4):308-312. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000188.
7
Development, validity and reliability of the 'Sitting Balance Measure' (SBM) in spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤中“坐位平衡测量法”(SBM)的开发、效度与信度
Spinal Cord. 2016 Apr;54(4):319-23. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.148. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
8
Proposal and validation of a clinical trunk control test in individuals with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者临床躯干控制测试的方案及验证
Spinal Cord. 2014 Jun;52(6):449-54. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.34. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
9
The Trunk Impairment Scale - modified to ordinal scales in the Norwegian version.躯干损伤量表 - 挪威语版本改为ordinal 量表。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(16):1385-95. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.645113. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
10
Validation of the Brazilian version in Portuguese of the Thoracic-Lumbar Control Scale for spinal cord injury.验证巴西版葡萄牙语的胸腰椎控制量表(TLCS)用于脊髓损伤。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Dec;49(12):1198-202. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.86. Epub 2011 Oct 18.