Quinzaños J, Villa A R, Flores A A, Pérez R
División de Rehabilitación Neurológica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico City, Mexico.
Facultad de Medicina, Coordinación de Investigación y Posgrado, UNAM, Mexico DF, Mexico.
Spinal Cord. 2014 Jun;52(6):449-54. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.34. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
One of the problems that arise in spinal cord injury (SCI) is alteration in trunk control. Despite the need for standardized scales, these do not exist for evaluating trunk control in SCI.
To propose and validate a trunk control test in individuals with SCI.
National Institute of Rehabilitation, Mexico.
The test was developed and later evaluated for reliability and criteria, content, and construct validity.
We carried out 531 tests on 177 patients and found high inter- and intra-rater reliability. In terms of criterion validity, analysis of variance demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the test score of patients with adequate or inadequate trunk control according to the assessment of a group of experts. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted for optimizing the instrument's cutoff point, which was determined at 13 points, with a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 92.2%. With regard to construct validity, the correlation between the proposed test and the spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) was 0.873 (P=0.001) and that with the evolution time was 0.437 (P=0.001). For testing the hypothesis with qualitative variables, the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed, which resulted in a statistically significant difference between the scores in the proposed scale of each group defined by these variables.
It was proven experimentally that the proposed trunk control test is valid and reliable. Furthermore, the test can be used for all patients with SCI despite the type and level of injury.
脊髓损伤(SCI)中出现的问题之一是躯干控制能力的改变。尽管需要标准化量表,但目前尚无用于评估SCI患者躯干控制能力的量表。
提出并验证一种针对SCI患者的躯干控制测试方法。
墨西哥国家康复研究所。
开发该测试方法,随后对其可靠性、标准效度、内容效度和结构效度进行评估。
我们对177例患者进行了531次测试,发现评分者间和评分者内的可靠性都很高。在标准效度方面,方差分析表明,根据一组专家的评估,躯干控制能力良好或不佳的患者在测试得分上存在统计学显著差异。绘制了受试者工作特征曲线以优化该工具的临界点,确定为13分,灵敏度为98%,特异度为92.2%。在结构效度方面,所提出的测试与脊髓独立性测量量表(SCIM)的相关性为0.873(P = 0.001),与病程的相关性为0.437(P = 0.001)。对于用定性变量检验假设,进行了Kruskal-Wallis检验,结果显示由这些变量定义的每组在所提出量表中的得分之间存在统计学显著差异。
实验证明,所提出的躯干控制测试方法是有效且可靠的。此外,无论损伤类型和损伤平面如何,该测试均可用于所有SCI患者。