Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Jinling Hospital Affiliated Medical School of Nanjing University, 305 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing 210002, PR China.
Department of Professional Training of Clinical Nursing, the Jinling Hospital Affiliated Medical School of Nanjing University, 305 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing 210002, PR China.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020 Oct;60:102880. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102880. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
To systematically review the delirium risk prediction models for intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
A systematic review was conducted. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid and Web of Science were searched to collect studies on delirium risk prediction models for ICU patients from database establishment to 31 March 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies using the CHARMS (CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies) checklist. A descriptive analysis was used to describe and summarise the data.
A total of six models were included. All studies reported the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the prediction models in the derivation and (or) validation datasets as over 0.7 (from 0.75 to 0.9). Five models reported calibration metrics. Decreased cognitive reserve and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score were the most commonly reported predisposing and precipitating factors, respectively, of ICU delirium among all models. The small sample size, lack of external validation and the absence of or unreported blinding method increased the risk of bias.
According to the discrimination and calibration statistics reported in the original studies, six prediction models may have moderate power in predicting ICU delirium. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution due to the risk of bias in the included studies. More clinical studies should be carried out to validate whether these tools have satisfactory predictive performance in delirium risk prediction for ICU patients.
系统评价 ICU 患者谵妄风险预测模型。
系统综述。检索 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Ovid 和 Web of Science,收集从数据库建立到 2019 年 3 月 31 日 ICU 患者谵妄风险预测模型的研究。两名审查员根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准独立筛选文献,提取数据,并使用 CHARMS(预测模型研究的关键评估和数据提取清单)清单评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用描述性分析对数据进行描述和总结。
共纳入 6 个模型。所有研究均报告了预测模型在推导和(或)验证数据集中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)均大于 0.7(范围为 0.75 至 0.9)。5 个模型报告了校准指标。认知储备减少和急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II(APACHE-II)评分分别是所有模型中 ICU 谵妄最常见的易患和诱发因素。纳入研究的偏倚风险较高,原因包括样本量小、缺乏外部验证以及缺乏或未报告盲法方法。
根据原始研究报告的区分度和校准统计数据,6 个预测模型在预测 ICU 谵妄方面可能具有中等效力。但是,由于纳入研究存在偏倚风险,因此应谨慎解释这一发现。应开展更多的临床研究,以验证这些工具在 ICU 患者谵妄风险预测方面是否具有令人满意的预测性能。