• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院诱导性谵妄的医疗-外科单位预后模型中的偏倚风险:系统评价。

Risk of bias in prognostic models of hospital-induced delirium for medical-surgical units: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Family, Community, and Health Systems Science, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.

Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0285527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285527. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0285527
PMID:37590196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10434879/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to assess risk of bias in existing prognostic models of hospital-induced delirium for medical-surgical units.

METHODS

APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched on July 8, 2022, to identify original studies which developed and validated prognostic models of hospital-induced delirium for adult patients who were hospitalized in medical-surgical units. The Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies was used for data extraction. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used to assess risk of bias. Risk of bias was assessed across four domains: participants, predictors, outcome, and analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, including ten model development and validation studies and three model validation only studies. The methods in all of the studies were rated to be at high overall risk of bias. The methods of statistical analysis were the greatest source of bias. External validity of models in the included studies was tested at low levels of transportability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the ongoing scientific challenge of developing a valid prognostic model of hospital-induced delirium for medical-surgical units to tailor preventive interventions to patients who are at high risk of this iatrogenic condition. With limited knowledge about generalizable prognosis of hospital-induced delirium in medical-surgical units, existing prognostic models should be used with caution when creating clinical practice policies. Future research protocols must include robust study designs which take into account the perspectives of clinicians to identify and validate risk factors of hospital-induced delirium for accurate and generalizable prognosis in medical-surgical units.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是评估现有的用于医疗外科单位的医院诱导性谵妄预后模型的偏倚风险。

方法

于 2022 年 7 月 8 日在 APA PsycInfo、CINAHL、MEDLINE 和 Web of Science Core Collection 上进行了检索,以确定用于医疗外科单位住院成人患者的医院诱导性谵妄预后模型的原始研究。使用预测模型系统评价的关键评估和数据提取清单进行数据提取。使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具来评估偏倚风险。偏倚风险在四个领域进行评估:参与者、预测因素、结局和分析。

结果

纳入了 13 项定性综合研究,包括 10 项模型开发和验证研究以及 3 项仅模型验证研究。所有研究的方法均被评为总体偏倚风险高。统计分析方法是偏倚的最大来源。纳入研究中模型的外部有效性在可转移性方面测试水平较低。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了在医疗外科单位开发有效的医院诱导性谵妄预后模型以针对这种医源性疾病高风险患者定制预防干预措施的持续科学挑战。由于对医疗外科单位医院诱导性谵妄的普遍预后知之甚少,因此在制定临床实践政策时应谨慎使用现有的预后模型。未来的研究方案必须包括稳健的研究设计,考虑到临床医生的观点,以识别和验证医院诱导性谵妄的风险因素,从而在医疗外科单位实现准确和普遍的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85c/10434879/d5630fd93dbc/pone.0285527.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85c/10434879/608d14c9ebad/pone.0285527.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85c/10434879/d0d6483046e2/pone.0285527.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85c/10434879/8b70fcebc8e4/pone.0285527.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85c/10434879/d5630fd93dbc/pone.0285527.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85c/10434879/608d14c9ebad/pone.0285527.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85c/10434879/d0d6483046e2/pone.0285527.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85c/10434879/8b70fcebc8e4/pone.0285527.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85c/10434879/d5630fd93dbc/pone.0285527.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of bias in prognostic models of hospital-induced delirium for medical-surgical units: A systematic review.医院诱导性谵妄的医疗-外科单位预后模型中的偏倚风险:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0285527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285527. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Prediction models for postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery: Systematic review and critical appraisal.心脏手术后术后谵妄预测模型:系统评价和批判性评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Dec;136:104340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104340. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
4
Delirium risk prediction models for intensive care unit patients: A systematic review.ICU 患者谵妄风险预测模型:系统评价。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020 Oct;60:102880. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102880. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
5
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.生物标志物对改良心脏风险指数在预测非心脏手术患者主要不良心脏事件和全因死亡率方面的比较和附加预后价值。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2.
6
Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient.老年住院患者谵妄预测模型的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 28;8(4):e019223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019223.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Application of a practice-based approach in variable selection for a prediction model development study of hospital-induced delirium.基于实践的方法在医院获得性谵妄预测模型开发研究中的变量选择中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Sep 13;23(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02278-1.
9
Performance of the Palliative Prognostic Index for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者姑息预后指数的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Palliat Med. 2023 Sep;37(8):1144-1167. doi: 10.1177/02692163231180657. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
10
Incidence, prognostic factors and impact of postoperative delirium after major vascular surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review.大血管手术后术后谵妄的发生率、预后因素及影响:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Vasc Med. 2017 Oct;22(5):387-397. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17721639. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Multidimensional Prognostic Index predicts incident delirium among hospitalized older patients with COVID-19: a multicenter prospective European study.多维预后指数预测 COVID-19 住院老年患者发生谵妄:一项多中心前瞻性欧洲研究。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Aug;15(4):961-969. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-00987-y. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
2
Clinical Prediction Models for Hospital-Induced Delirium Using Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Record Data: Protocol for a Development and Validation Study.使用结构化和非结构化电子健康记录数据的医院诱发谵妄临床预测模型:一项开发与验证研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 9;12:e48521. doi: 10.2196/48521.

本文引用的文献

1
Head-to-head comparison of 14 prediction models for postoperative delirium in elderly non-ICU patients: an external validation study.头对头比较 14 种预测模型用于老年非 ICU 患者术后谵妄:一项外部验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e054023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054023.
2
Developing a machine learning model to identify delirium risk in geriatric internal medicine inpatients.开发一种机器学习模型以识别老年内科住院患者的谵妄风险。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Feb;13(1):173-183. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00562-9. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
3
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
4
ICU Delirium-Prediction Models: A Systematic Review.重症监护病房谵妄预测模型:一项系统综述。
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Dec 16;2(12):e0296. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000296. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Risk predictive models for delirium in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护病房谵妄的风险预测模型:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;10(2):1467. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1183. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Risk prediction of delirium in hospitalized patients using machine learning: An implementation and prospective evaluation study.使用机器学习预测住院患者谵妄的风险:一项实施和前瞻性评估研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(9):1383-1392. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa113.
7
A call to action for delirium research: Meta-analysis and regression of delirium associated mortality.呼吁开展谵妄研究:对谵妄相关死亡率的荟萃分析和回归分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01723-4.
8
Delirium risk prediction models for intensive care unit patients: A systematic review.ICU 患者谵妄风险预测模型:系统评价。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020 Oct;60:102880. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102880. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
The consistent burden in published estimates of delirium occurrence in medical inpatients over four decades: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.四十年来医学住院患者谵妄发生率已发表估计值中的持续负担:一项系统评价和荟萃分析研究
Age Ageing. 2020 Apr 27;49(3):352-360. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa040.
10
Initiative for Prevention and Early Identification of Delirium in Medical-Surgical Units: Lessons Learned in the Past Five Years.预防和早期识别医疗-外科单位中意识混乱的倡议:过去五年的经验教训。
Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1421-1430.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.05.035. Epub 2019 Jun 20.