• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越功能状态评估。

Beyond Performance Status.

机构信息

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2020 Sep;32(9):553-561. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.016
PMID:32684503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7365102/
Abstract

Oncologists should recognise the need to move beyond the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score. ECOG PS is a longstanding and ubiquitous feature of oncology. It was evolved 40 years ago as an adaption of the 70-year-old Karnofsky performance score. It is short, easily understood and part of the global language of oncology. The wide prevalence of the ECOG PS attests to its proven utility and worth to help triage patient treatment. The ECOG PS is problematic. It is a unidimensional functional score. It is mostly physician assessed, subjective and therefore open to bias. It fails to account for multimorbidity, frailty or cognition. Too often the PS is recorded only once in wilful ignorance of a patient's changing physical state. As modern oncology offers an ever-widening array of therapies that are 'personalised' to tumour genotype, modern oncologists must strive to better define patient phenotype. Using a wider range of scoring and assessment tools, oncologists can identify deficits that may be reversed or steps taken to mitigate detrimental effects of treatment. These tools can function well to identify those patients who would benefit from comprehensive assessment. This overview identifies the strengths of ECOG PS but highlights the weaknesses and where these are supported by other measures. A strong recommendation is made here to move to routine use of the Clinical Frailty Score to start to triage patients and most appropriately design treatments and rehabilitation interventions.

摘要

肿瘤学家应该认识到需要超越东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态(ECOG PS)评分。ECOG PS 是肿瘤学中一个长期存在且无处不在的特征。它是 40 年前从已有 70 年历史的卡氏功能状态评分演变而来的。它简短、易于理解,是肿瘤学全球通用语言的一部分。ECOG PS 的广泛流行证明了其在帮助患者治疗分类方面的实用价值和作用。ECOG PS 存在问题。它是一种单一维度的功能评分。它主要由医生评估,具有主观性,因此容易受到偏见的影响。它没有考虑到多病共存、虚弱或认知能力。太多时候,PS 只是在患者身体状况不断变化的情况下被故意记录一次。随着现代肿瘤学提供了越来越多针对肿瘤基因型的“个体化”治疗方法,现代肿瘤学家必须努力更好地定义患者的表型。使用更广泛的评分和评估工具,肿瘤学家可以识别出可能逆转的缺陷,或采取措施减轻治疗的不利影响。这些工具可以很好地识别出那些需要全面评估的患者。本综述确定了 ECOG PS 的优势,但强调了其弱点,以及其他措施在哪些方面支持了它。这里强烈建议常规使用临床虚弱评分来开始对患者进行分类,并最适当地设计治疗和康复干预措施。

相似文献

1
Beyond Performance Status.超越功能状态评估。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2020 Sep;32(9):553-561. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
Comparing Physician and Nurse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) Ratings as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer.比较医师和护士的东部肿瘤协作组表现状态(ECOG-PS)评分,以预测癌症患者的临床结局。
Oncologist. 2019 Dec;24(12):e1460-e1466. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0882. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
3
Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status.将美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)/世界卫生组织(WHO)体能状态评分与美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分作为功能状态衡量指标的比较。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Feb;49(2):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
4
Differences in Performance Status Assessment Among Palliative Care Specialists, Nurses, and Medical Oncologists.姑息治疗专家、护士和医学肿瘤学家在性能状态评估方面的差异。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jun;49(6):1050-1058.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
5
The Correlative Strength of Objective Physical Assessment Against the ECOG Performance Status Assessment in Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer.客观身体评估与癌症患者 ECOG 体能状况评估的相关性。
Phys Ther. 2020 Mar 10;100(3):416-428. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz192.
6
Integrating Frailty Assessment to Enhance Care in Cancer Patients with Borderline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status.将脆弱评估整合到边缘东部合作肿瘤学组体能状态的癌症患者的护理中。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Nov;41(11):1272-1279. doi: 10.1177/10499091231226062. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
7
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.转移性胰腺癌:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 10;34(23):2784-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1412. Epub 2016 May 31.
8
Assessing measures of comorbidity and functional status for risk adjustment to compare hospital performance for colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective data-linkage study.评估合并症和功能状态指标以进行风险调整,比较结直肠癌手术的医院绩效:一项回顾性数据关联研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jul 15;15:55. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0175-1.
9
Performance Status Assessment by Using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Score for Cancer Patients by Oncology Healthcare Professionals.肿瘤医疗专业人员使用东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分对癌症患者进行的体能状态评估。
Case Rep Oncol. 2019 Sep 25;12(3):728-736. doi: 10.1159/000503095. eCollection 2019 Sep-Dec.
10
Symptom Burden in Patients With Reduced Performance Status at the Start of Palliative Radiotherapy.在开始进行姑息性放射治疗时,身体状况较差的患者的症状负担。
In Vivo. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):735-738. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11832.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a machine learning-based early warning system for predicting venous thromboembolism risk in hospitalized lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy: a multicenter and retrospective cohort study.基于机器学习的住院化疗淋巴瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞风险预测预警系统的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 12;15:1566905. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1566905. eCollection 2025.
2
Improving Outcomes in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of Immunotherapy in Multimodal Treatment.改善胰腺腺癌的治疗结果:多模式治疗中免疫疗法的系统评价
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 11;61(6):1076. doi: 10.3390/medicina61061076.
3
Skeletal Muscle Density as a Predictive Marker for Pathologic Complete Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy.骨骼肌密度作为新辅助化疗免疫治疗的三阴性乳腺癌病理完全缓解的预测标志物
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 25;17(11):1768. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111768.
4
Skeletal Muscle Density as a Predictor of Prognosis and Physical Reserve in Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary.骨骼肌密度作为原发性不明癌症患者预后和体能储备的预测指标
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 24;14(9):2947. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092947.
5
Differential Prognostic Impact of Tumor Burden Score on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Variable Physical Performance Status.肿瘤负荷评分对不同身体状况的肝细胞癌患者的预后影响差异
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08971-7.
6
Comprehensive Age-Stratified Impact of Mutation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Real-World Experience.急性髓系白血病中突变的综合年龄分层影响:一项真实世界研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 18;17(6):1020. doi: 10.3390/cancers17061020.
7
Cost-effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China: a comprehensive analysis.中国PD-1抑制剂联合化疗一线治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的成本效益:一项综合分析
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2482019. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2482019. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
8
N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)-A Prognostic Biomarker in Older and/or Frail Adults with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the GO2 Clinical Trial.N 端前 B 型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)——老年和/或体弱晚期食管癌患者的一种预后生物标志物:GO2 临床试验的事后分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 10;17(4):601. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040601.
9
Frailty and outcomes in adults undergoing systemic anticancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受全身抗癌治疗的成年人的衰弱状况与预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Jul 1;117(7):1316-1339. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf017.
10
Comparison of the sociodemographic and clinical profiles of cancer patients admitted to a tertiary palliative care unit before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情之前及期间入住三级姑息治疗病房的癌症患者的社会人口统计学和临床特征比较。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 29;24(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01663-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment methods and services for older people with cancer in the United Kingdom.英国针对老年癌症患者的评估方法与服务
World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 24;11(3):152-161. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i3.152.
2
Prognostic Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer.癌症患者报告结局的预后意义。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Apr;16(4):e313-e323. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00329. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
3
Handgrip weakness, low fat-free mass, and overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative-intent radiotherapy.根治性放疗治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的握力减弱、去脂体重低与总生存期
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Apr;11(2):424-431. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12526. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
4
The Correlative Strength of Objective Physical Assessment Against the ECOG Performance Status Assessment in Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer.客观身体评估与癌症患者 ECOG 体能状况评估的相关性。
Phys Ther. 2020 Mar 10;100(3):416-428. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz192.
5
Rising to the challenge of multimorbidity.应对多种疾病的挑战。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 6;368:l6964. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6964.
6
Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment among healthcare professionals: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.医务人员体能状态评估中绩效评估的组内可靠性:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2071-2078. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05261-7. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
7
Impact of performance status on treatment outcomes: A real-world study of advanced urothelial cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.体力状况对治疗结局的影响:免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期尿路上皮癌的真实世界研究。
Cancer. 2020 Mar 15;126(6):1208-1216. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32645. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
8
Analysis of Heterogeneity in Survival Benefit of Immunotherapy in Oncology According to Patient Demographics and Performance Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Overall Survival Data.根据患者人口统计学和表现状态分析肿瘤免疫治疗生存获益的异质性:一项总体生存数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar;43(3):193-202. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000650.
9
Poor-Performance Status Assessment of Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Remains Vague and Blurred in the Immunotherapy Era.免疫治疗时代,非小细胞肺癌患者的一般状况评估仍然模糊不清。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2019 Nov 25;21(12):107. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0852-9.
10
Frailty in the perioperative setting.围手术期衰弱。
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Nov;19(6):485-489. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0283.