Suppr超能文献

社区药剂师对膳食补充剂的使用、认知及知识水平:一项横断面研究。

Community pharmacists' use, perception and knowledge on dietary supplements: a cross sectional study.

作者信息

Bukic Josipa, Kuzmanic Branka, Rusic Doris, Portolan Mate, Mihanovic Ante, Seselja Perisin Ana, Leskur Dario, Petric Ana, Bozic Josko, Tomic Sinisa, Modun Darko

机构信息

PhD, MPharm. Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Split. Split (Croatia).

MPharm. Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Split. Split (Croatia).

出版信息

Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):2251. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2251. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacists are commonly tasked with recommending the appropriate dietary supplement and advising the patients of their correct and safe use. Previous research, conducted on pharmacy students, showed that they did not always use the evidence based sources of information, with personal use identified as a significant predictor influencing the decision to recommend a supplement.

OBJECTIVES

To compare use, perceptions and knowledge of dietary supplements of pharmacists with different years of work experience and to explore factors that could influence their recommendation of supplements.

METHODS

A questionnaire based cross-sectional study was conducted on Croatian community pharmacists in September 2017. The questionnaire explored pharmacists' demographic characteristics, use, perceptions and knowledge of dietary supplements. Pharmacists (N=102) were divided in two groups based on their work experience: P0 (<10 years) and P1 (≥10 years).

RESULTS

All included pharmacists had high knowledge scores without differences between groups (P0=10, IQR 9-12 vs P1=11, IQR 9-12, expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), p=0.275). Less experienced pharmacists perceived there was less research conducted on the dietary supplements compared to their more experienced counterparts (P0=1, IQR 1-2 vs P1=2, IQR 2-3, expressed as median and interquartile range, p<0.001). Groups differed in sources used when choosing the appropriate supplement with P0 using higher quality sources such as systematic reviews in comparison to P1 (32.1% vs 8.7%, p=0.004). Pharmacists' decision to recommend a dietary supplement was influenced by their personal use (odds ratio 0.216, 95%CI 0.068:0.689, p=0.01) and work experience (odds ratio 0.154, 95%CI 0.045:0.530, p=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacists did not use the high quality sources when recommending dietary supplements and their decision to recommend the supplement was not based on objective evaluation of evidence. Further education about the practice of evidence-based pharmacy is necessary, with special emphasis on senior pharmacists who might have missed that aspect during their formal education.

摘要

背景

药剂师的常见任务是推荐合适的膳食补充剂,并告知患者正确和安全的使用方法。此前针对药学专业学生开展的研究表明,他们并非总是使用基于证据的信息来源,个人使用情况被确定为影响推荐补充剂决策的一个重要预测因素。

目的

比较不同工作年限药剂师对膳食补充剂的使用情况、认知和知识,并探讨可能影响其推荐补充剂的因素。

方法

2017年9月对克罗地亚社区药剂师进行了一项基于问卷调查的横断面研究。该问卷探讨了药剂师的人口统计学特征、膳食补充剂的使用情况、认知和知识。药剂师(N = 102)根据工作经验分为两组:P0(<10年)和P1(≥10年)。

结果

所有纳入的药剂师知识得分都很高,两组之间无差异(P0 = 10,四分位间距9 - 12;P1 = 11,四分位间距9 - 12,以中位数和四分位间距表示,p = 0.275)。与经验更丰富的同行相比,经验较少的药剂师认为针对膳食补充剂开展的研究较少(P0 = 1,四分位间距1 - 2;P1 = 2,四分位间距2 - 3,以中位数和四分位间距表示,p < 0.001)。在选择合适的补充剂时,两组使用的信息来源存在差异,P0组使用更高质量的来源,如系统评价,而P1组则不然(32.1%对8.7%,p = 0.004)。药剂师推荐膳食补充剂的决策受其个人使用情况(比值比0.216,95%置信区间0.068:0.689,p = 0.01)和工作经验(比值比0.154,95%置信区间0.045:0.530,p = 0.003)的影响。

结论

药剂师在推荐膳食补充剂时未使用高质量的信息来源,且其推荐补充剂的决策并非基于对证据的客观评估。有必要对循证药学实践进行进一步教育,尤其要重点关注那些在正规教育期间可能忽略这方面内容的资深药剂师。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验