• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲的癌症筛查参与情况和性别分层。

Cancer Screening Participation and Gender Stratification in Europe.

机构信息

Ghent University, Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium.

University of Geneva, Geneva, GE, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Health Soc Behav. 2020 Sep;61(3):377-395. doi: 10.1177/0022146520938708. Epub 2020 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1177/0022146520938708
PMID:32686508
Abstract

The current study examines whether the extent of macrolevel gender inequality affects the association between women's educational attainment and their participation in cervical and breast cancer screening and how this relationship is moderated by a country's cancer screening strategy (organized vs. opportunistic). A multilevel design with women (N = 99,794; N = 55,021) nested in 30 European countries was used to analyze data from the European Health Interview Survey (2013-2015). Results of multilevel logistic regression models demonstrate that higher macrolevel gender inequality is associated with (a) a lower overall likelihood that women have had a mammography and Pap smear and (b) a larger gap in participation between women with low and high levels of education, regardless of a country's screening strategy (i.e., no moderation by a country's screening strategy was found). We conclude that macrolevel gender stratification should not be neglected when designing cancer screening policy.

摘要

本研究考察了宏观性别不平等程度是否会影响女性受教育程度与宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查参与之间的关联,以及这种关系是否受到国家癌症筛查策略(有组织与机会性)的调节。该研究采用多层次设计,将女性(N=99794;N=55021)嵌套在 30 个欧洲国家中,对欧洲健康访谈调查(2013-2015 年)的数据进行了分析。多水平逻辑回归模型的结果表明,较高的宏观性别不平等程度与以下情况相关:(a)女性进行乳房 X 光检查和巴氏涂片检查的总体可能性较低;(b)无论国家的筛查策略如何(即,未发现国家筛查策略的调节作用),教育程度较低和较高的女性之间的参与差距更大。我们的结论是,在制定癌症筛查政策时,不应忽视宏观性别分层。

相似文献

1
Cancer Screening Participation and Gender Stratification in Europe.欧洲的癌症筛查参与情况和性别分层。
J Health Soc Behav. 2020 Sep;61(3):377-395. doi: 10.1177/0022146520938708. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
2
The association of social support and education with breast and cervical cancer screening.社会支持与教育与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的关联。
Health Educ Behav. 2015 Feb;42(1):55-64. doi: 10.1177/1090198114557124. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
3
The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia.区域筛查政策对比利时癌症筛查参与率普及的影响:佛兰德斯和瓦隆地区教育不平等的时间趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3746-x.
4
The Effect of Education on the Early Diagnosis of Breast and Cervix Cancer on the Women's Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Participating in Screening Programs.教育对乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期诊断的影响以及女性参与筛查项目的态度和行为
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):821-832. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1193-8.
5
Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002.2002年纽约市50岁及以上女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查中的障碍与错失的机会
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Jan-Feb;16(1):46-56. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0079.
6
Geographical and socioeconomic differences in uptake of Pap test and mammography in Italy: results from the National Health Interview Survey.意大利子宫颈抹片检查和乳房X光检查接受情况的地理和社会经济差异:全国健康访谈调查结果
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 19;8(9):e021653. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021653.
7
Educational level, voluntary private health insurance and opportunistic cancer screening among women in Catalonia (Spain).西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区女性的教育水平、自愿私人医疗保险与机会性癌症筛查
Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999 Oct;8(5):427-34. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199910000-00008.
8
Gender inequality and mammography screening: Does living with a partner improve women's mammography uptake?性别不平等与乳房 X 光筛查:与伴侣一起生活是否能提高女性乳房 X 光筛查的参与率?
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114875. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114875. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
9
Compliance with breast and cervical cancer screening programs in women: results from a population-based study.女性对乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查项目的依从性:一项基于人群研究的结果。
Tumori. 2013 Sep-Oct;99(5):565-71. doi: 10.1177/030089161309900501.
10
Does mammogram attendance influence participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening? A prospective study among 1856 French women.乳腺 X 光检查的参与是否会影响宫颈癌和结直肠癌的筛查参与率?一项针对 1856 名法国女性的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0198939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198939. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Ethnically Diverse Women in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana.影响宫颈癌筛查的因素:加纳库马西大都会不同种族女性的横断面研究
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;8(2):e70433. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70433. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Individual well-being and national determinants of screening mammography among women over fifty.五十岁以上女性乳腺钼靶筛查的个体幸福感及国家层面的决定因素
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 24;24(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02389-3.
3
Cancer situation in China: an analysis based on the global epidemiological data released in 2024.
中国癌症状况:基于2024年发布的全球流行病学数据的分析
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2025 Feb;45(2):178-197. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12627. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
4
Socio-economic inequalities in the use of flu vaccination in Europe: a multilevel approach.欧洲流感疫苗接种使用中的社会经济不平等:一种多层次方法。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1.
5
Does women's empowerment and their socioeconomic condition affect the uptake of breast cancer screening? Findings from NFHS-5, India.妇女赋权及其社会经济状况是否会影响乳腺癌筛查的接受程度?来自 NFHS-5,印度的发现。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jan 7;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02147-5.
6
Cervical cancer (over-)screening in Europe: Balancing organised and opportunistic programmes.欧洲的宫颈癌(过度)筛查:平衡有组织和机会性的方案。
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Dec;51(8):1239-1247. doi: 10.1177/14034948221118215. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
7
Social inequalities, length of hospital stay for chronic conditions and the mediating role of comorbidity and discharge destination: A multilevel analysis of hospital administrative data linked to the population census in Switzerland.社会不平等、慢性病住院时间以及合并症和出院目的地的中介作用:瑞士医院行政数据与人口普查数据关联的多水平分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 24;17(8):e0272265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272265. eCollection 2022.
8
Trends and Determinants in Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening in Spain: An Analysis of National Surveys from 2017 and 2020.西班牙宫颈癌筛查的趋势与决定因素:对2017年和2020年全国调查的分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 18;14(10):2481. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102481.
9
Cervical cancer screening programs and their context-dependent effect on inequalities in screening uptake: a dynamic interplay between public health policy and welfare state redistribution.宫颈癌筛查计划及其对筛查参与不平等的背景相关影响:公共卫生政策与福利国家再分配之间的动态相互作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Sep 24;20(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01548-6.
10
Macro-contextual determinants of cancer screening participation and inequalities: A multilevel analysis of 29 European countries.癌症筛查参与度及不平等现象的宏观背景决定因素:对29个欧洲国家的多层次分析
SSM Popul Health. 2021 May 28;15:100830. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100830. eCollection 2021 Sep.