Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals and Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Oct;50(10):e13357. doi: 10.1111/eci.13357. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
To validate the diagnostic accuracy of the Augurix SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG rapid immunoassay diagnostic test (RDT) for COVID-19.
In this unmatched 1:1 case-control study, blood samples from 46 real-time RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized cases and 45 healthy donors (negative controls) were studied. Diagnostic accuracy of the IgG RDT was assessed against both an in-house recombinant spike-expressing immunofluorescence assay (rIFA), as an established reference method (primary endpoint), and the Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (secondary endpoint).
COVID-19 patients were more likely to be male (61% vs 20%; P = .0001) and older (median 66 vs 47 years old; P < .001) than controls. Whole blood IgG-RDT results showed 86% and 93% overall Kendall concordance with rIFA and IgG ELISA, respectively. IgG RDT performances were similar between plasma and whole blood. Overall, RDT sensitivity was 88% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 70-96), specificity 98% (95%CI: 90-100), PPV 97% (95%CI: 80-100) and NPV 94% (95%CI: 84-98). The IgG-RDT carried out from 0 to 6 days, 7 to 14 days and > 14 days after the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test displayed 30%, 73% and 100% positivity rates in the COVID-19 group, respectively. When considering samples taken >14 days after RT-PCR diagnosis, NPV was 100% (95%CI:90-100), and PPV was 100% (95%CI:72-100).
The Augurix IgG-RDT done in whole blood displays a high diagnostic accuracy for SARS-CoV-2 IgG in high COVID-19 prevalence settings, where its use could be considered in the absence of routine diagnostic serology facilities.
验证 Augurix SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG 快速免疫诊断检测(RDT)用于 COVID-19 的诊断准确性。
在这项不匹配的 1:1 病例对照研究中,研究了 46 例经实时 RT-PCR 确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 住院病例和 45 例健康供体(阴性对照)的血液样本。使用内源性重组刺突表达免疫荧光检测(rIFA)作为既定参考方法(主要终点)和 Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)(次要终点)评估 IgG RDT 的诊断准确性。
COVID-19 患者更可能为男性(61% vs 20%;P =.0001)和年龄较大(中位数 66 岁 vs 47 岁;P <.001)。全血 IgG-RDT 结果与 rIFA 和 IgG ELISA 分别显示 86%和 93%的整体 Kendall 一致性。IgG RDT 在血浆和全血中的性能相似。总体而言,RDT 的敏感性为 88%(95%置信区间 [95%CI]:70-96),特异性为 98%(95%CI:90-100),PPV 为 97%(95%CI:80-100),NPV 为 94%(95%CI:84-98)。在 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测后 0-6 天、7-14 天和 >14 天进行的 IgG-RDT 中,COVID-19 组的阳性率分别为 30%、73%和 100%。当考虑在 RT-PCR 诊断后 >14 天采集的样本时,NPV 为 100%(95%CI:90-100),PPV 为 100%(95%CI:72-100)。
在高 COVID-19 流行地区,全血中的 Augurix IgG-RDT 对 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 的诊断准确性较高,在常规诊断血清学检测设施缺乏的情况下,可以考虑使用该检测。