Suppr超能文献

Augurix COVID-19 IgG 血清学快速检测的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic accuracy of Augurix COVID-19 IgG serology rapid test.

机构信息

Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals and Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Oct;50(10):e13357. doi: 10.1111/eci.13357. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

Abstract

AIMS

To validate the diagnostic accuracy of the Augurix SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG rapid immunoassay diagnostic test (RDT) for COVID-19.

METHODS

In this unmatched 1:1 case-control study, blood samples from 46 real-time RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized cases and 45 healthy donors (negative controls) were studied. Diagnostic accuracy of the IgG RDT was assessed against both an in-house recombinant spike-expressing immunofluorescence assay (rIFA), as an established reference method (primary endpoint), and the Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (secondary endpoint).

RESULTS

COVID-19 patients were more likely to be male (61% vs 20%; P = .0001) and older (median 66 vs 47 years old; P < .001) than controls. Whole blood IgG-RDT results showed 86% and 93% overall Kendall concordance with rIFA and IgG ELISA, respectively. IgG RDT performances were similar between plasma and whole blood. Overall, RDT sensitivity was 88% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 70-96), specificity 98% (95%CI: 90-100), PPV 97% (95%CI: 80-100) and NPV 94% (95%CI: 84-98). The IgG-RDT carried out from 0 to 6 days, 7 to 14 days and > 14 days after the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test displayed 30%, 73% and 100% positivity rates in the COVID-19 group, respectively. When considering samples taken >14 days after RT-PCR diagnosis, NPV was 100% (95%CI:90-100), and PPV was 100% (95%CI:72-100).

CONCLUSIONS

The Augurix IgG-RDT done in whole blood displays a high diagnostic accuracy for SARS-CoV-2 IgG in high COVID-19 prevalence settings, where its use could be considered in the absence of routine diagnostic serology facilities.

摘要

目的

验证 Augurix SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG 快速免疫诊断检测(RDT)用于 COVID-19 的诊断准确性。

方法

在这项不匹配的 1:1 病例对照研究中,研究了 46 例经实时 RT-PCR 确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 住院病例和 45 例健康供体(阴性对照)的血液样本。使用内源性重组刺突表达免疫荧光检测(rIFA)作为既定参考方法(主要终点)和 Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)(次要终点)评估 IgG RDT 的诊断准确性。

结果

COVID-19 患者更可能为男性(61% vs 20%;P =.0001)和年龄较大(中位数 66 岁 vs 47 岁;P <.001)。全血 IgG-RDT 结果与 rIFA 和 IgG ELISA 分别显示 86%和 93%的整体 Kendall 一致性。IgG RDT 在血浆和全血中的性能相似。总体而言,RDT 的敏感性为 88%(95%置信区间 [95%CI]:70-96),特异性为 98%(95%CI:90-100),PPV 为 97%(95%CI:80-100),NPV 为 94%(95%CI:84-98)。在 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测后 0-6 天、7-14 天和 >14 天进行的 IgG-RDT 中,COVID-19 组的阳性率分别为 30%、73%和 100%。当考虑在 RT-PCR 诊断后 >14 天采集的样本时,NPV 为 100%(95%CI:90-100),PPV 为 100%(95%CI:72-100)。

结论

在高 COVID-19 流行地区,全血中的 Augurix IgG-RDT 对 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 的诊断准确性较高,在常规诊断血清学检测设施缺乏的情况下,可以考虑使用该检测。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of Augurix COVID-19 IgG serology rapid test.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Oct;50(10):e13357. doi: 10.1111/eci.13357. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6(6):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.
3
Validation of a commercially available SARS-CoV-2 serological immunoassay.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Oct;26(10):1386-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
4
Antibody Detection and Dynamic Characteristics in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 5;71(8):1930-1934. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa461.
5
Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0237694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237694. eCollection 2020.
8
Rapid Determination of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using a bedside, point-of-Care, serological test.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):2212-2221. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1826892.
10
Temporal Course of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Positivity in Patients with COVID-19 following the First Clinical Presentation.
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 16;2020:9878453. doi: 10.1155/2020/9878453. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Progress in SARS-CoV-2, diagnostic and clinical treatment of COVID-19.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 17;10(12):e33179. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33179. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
4
Recent advances in immunoassay technologies for the detection of human coronavirus infections.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jan 4;12:1040248. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1040248. eCollection 2022.
5
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of SARS-COV-2 IGM and IGG tests in individuals with COVID-19.
J Clin Virol. 2022 Mar;148:105121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105121. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
9
"Rapid Counseling" as a new breakthrough: An alternative approach for patients with COVID-19.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2021 Dec;35(6):645-646. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of a commercially available SARS-CoV-2 serological immunoassay.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Oct;26(10):1386-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
2
Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2.
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2249-2251. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8259.
3
Evaluation of a COVID-19 IgM and IgG rapid test; an efficient tool for assessment of past exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 14;10(1):1754538. doi: 10.1080/20008686.2020.1754538. eCollection 2020.
4
5
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Specific Antibody Responses in Coronavirus Disease Patients.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1478-1488. doi: 10.3201/eid2607.200841. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
7
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.
8
Presence of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus antibodies in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide, cross-sectional, serological study.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 May;15(5):559-64. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70090-3. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
9
Assays for laboratory confirmation of novel human coronavirus (hCoV-EMC) infections.
Euro Surveill. 2012 Dec 6;17(49):20334. doi: 10.2807/ese.17.49.20334-en.
10
A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Jan;40(1):35-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02234.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验