Gliga Teodora, Elsabbagh Mayada, Andravizou Athina, Johnson Mark
Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London.
Infancy. 2009 Sep 10;14(5):550-562. doi: 10.1080/15250000903144199. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
Infant's face preferences have previously been assessed in displays containing 1 or 2 faces. Here we present 6-month-old infants with a complex visual array containing faces among multiple visual objects. Despite the competing objects, infants direct their first saccade toward faces more frequently than expected by chance (Experiment 1). The attention-grabbing effect of faces is not selective to upright faces (Experiment 2) but does require the presence of internal facial elements, as faces whose interior has been phase-scrambled did not attract infants' attention (Experiment 3). On the contrary, when the number of fixations is considered, upright faces are scanned more extensively than both inverted and phase-scrambled faces. The difference in selectivity between the first look measure and the fixation count measure is discussed in light of a distinction between attention-grabbing and attention-holding mechanisms.
此前,婴儿的面部偏好是在包含1张或2张面孔的展示中进行评估的。在此,我们向6个月大的婴儿呈现一个复杂的视觉阵列,其中在多个视觉对象中包含面孔。尽管存在竞争对象,但婴儿首次扫视面孔的频率高于随机预期(实验1)。面孔的吸引注意力效应并非仅针对正立面孔(实验2),但确实需要内部面部元素的存在,因为内部已进行相位扰乱的面孔并未吸引婴儿的注意力(实验3)。相反,当考虑注视次数时,正立面孔比倒置面孔和相位扰乱面孔被更广泛地扫视。根据吸引注意力和保持注意力机制之间的区别,讨论了首次注视测量和注视次数测量之间选择性的差异。