Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA,
Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Acta Cytol. 2021;65(4):286-300. doi: 10.1159/000508629. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
In the face of rapid technological advances in computational cytology including artificial intelligence (AI), optimization of its application to clinical practice would benefit from reflection on the lessons learned from the decades-long journey in the development of computer-assisted Pap test screening.
The initial driving force for automated screening in cytology was the overwhelming number of Pap tests requiring manual screening, leading to workflow backlogs and incorrect diagnoses. Several companies invested resources to address these concerns utilizing different specimen processing techniques and imaging systems. However, not all companies were commercially prosperous. Successful implementation of this new technology required viable use cases, improved clinical outcomes, and an acceptable means of integration into the daily workflow of cytopathology laboratories. Several factors including supply and demand, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight, reimbursement, overcoming learning curves and workflow changes associated with the adoption of new technology, and cytologist apprehension, played a significant role in either promoting or preventing the widespread adoption of automated screening technologies. Key Messages: Any change in health care, particularly those involving new technology that impacts clinical workflow, is bound to have its successes and failures. However, perseverance through learning curves, optimizing workflow processes, improvements in diagnostic accuracy, and regulatory and financial approval can facilitate widespread adoption of these technologies. Given their history with successfully implementing automated Pap test screening, cytologists are uniquely positioned to not only help with the development of AI technology for other areas of pathology, but also to guide how they are utilized, regulated, and managed.
面对计算细胞学领域(包括人工智能)的快速技术进步,如果能从计算机辅助巴氏涂片筛查发展的几十年历程中吸取经验教训,将有助于优化其在临床实践中的应用。
细胞学自动化筛查的最初驱动力是大量需要人工筛查的巴氏涂片检测,这导致了工作流程积压和误诊。几家公司投入资源利用不同的标本处理技术和成像系统来解决这些问题。然而,并非所有公司都取得了商业上的成功。这项新技术的成功实施需要切实可行的用例、改善临床结果和一种可接受的方法将其整合到细胞学实验室的日常工作流程中。包括供需关系、美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)监管、报销、克服与采用新技术相关的学习曲线和工作流程变化以及细胞病理学家的担忧在内的几个因素在促进或阻碍自动化筛查技术的广泛采用方面发挥了重要作用。
任何医疗保健的改变,尤其是那些涉及影响临床工作流程的新技术的改变,都必然会有成功和失败。然而,通过学习曲线、优化工作流程、提高诊断准确性以及监管和财务审批的坚持,可以促进这些技术的广泛采用。鉴于他们在成功实施自动化巴氏涂片筛查方面的历史经验,细胞病理学家不仅有能力帮助开发病理学其他领域的人工智能技术,而且还可以指导如何利用、监管和管理这些技术。