• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Hologic Genius数字诊断系统分析高级别鳞状上皮内病变巴氏诊断的敏感性及观察者间差异。

Analysis of the sensitivity of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Pap diagnosis and interobserver variability with the Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System.

作者信息

Harinath Lakshmi, Elishaev Esther, Ye Yuhong, Matsko Jonee, Colaizzi Amy, Wharton Stephanie, Bhargava Rohit, Pantanowitz Liron, Zhao Chengquan

机构信息

Department of Pathology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Cancer Cytopathol. 2025 Jan;133(1):e22918. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22918. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1002/cncy.22918
PMID:39498535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11695705/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems are transforming cytopathology practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) Papanicolaou (Pap) diagnosis assisted by the Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System (GDDS).

METHODS

A validation study was performed with 890 ThinPrep Pap tests with the GDDS independently. From this set, a subset of 183 cases originally interpreted as HSIL confirmed histologically were included in this study. The sensitivity for detecting HSIL by three cytopathologists was calculated.

RESULTS

Most HSIL cases were classified as atypical glandular cell/atypical squamous cell-high grade not excluded (AGC/ASC-H) and above by all cytopathologists. Of these cases, 11.5% were classified as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) by pathologist A (P-A), 6% by pathologist B (P-B), and 5.5% by pathologist C (P-C); 3.8%, 2.7%, and 1.6% of these cases were classified as atypical squamous cell of unknown significance (ASC-US) by P-A, P-B, and P-C, respectively. The sensitivity for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and above (CIN2+) lesions was 100% if ASC-US and above (ASC-US+) abnormalities were counted among all three pathologists. The sensitivity for detection of CIN2+ lesions was 84.7%, 91.3%, and 92.9% by P-A, P-B, and P-C, respectively, for ASC-H and above abnormalities. The Kendall W coefficient was 0.722, which indicated strong agreement between all pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS

New-generation AI-assisted Pap test screening systems such as the GDDS have the potential to transform cytology practice. In this study, the GDDS aided in interpreting HSIL in ThinPrep Pap tests, with good sensitivity and agreement between the pathologists who interacted with this system.

摘要

背景

基于人工智能(AI)的系统正在改变细胞病理学实践。本研究的目的是评估Hologic Genius数字诊断系统(GDDS)辅助诊断高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)巴氏涂片的敏感性。

方法

独立使用GDDS对890例薄层液基细胞学涂片进行了验证研究。从该组中,选取183例最初经组织学确诊为HSIL的病例纳入本研究。计算了三位细胞病理学家检测HSIL的敏感性。

结果

所有细胞病理学家将大多数HSIL病例分类为非典型腺细胞/不排除高级别非典型鳞状细胞(AGC/ASC-H)及以上。在这些病例中,病理学家A(P-A)将11.5%分类为低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL),病理学家B(P-B)将6%分类为LSIL,病理学家C(P-C)将5.5%分类为LSIL;P-A、P-B和P-C分别将这些病例的3.8%、2.7%和1.6%分类为意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US)。如果将ASC-US及以上(ASC-US+)异常计算在内,三位病理学家检测宫颈上皮内瘤变2级及以上(CIN2+)病变的敏感性为100%。对于ASC-H及以上异常,P-A、P-B和P-C检测CIN2+病变的敏感性分别为84.7%、91.3%和92.9%。肯德尔W系数为0.722,表明所有病理学家之间有很强的一致性。

结论

新一代AI辅助巴氏涂片筛查系统,如GDDS,有可能改变细胞学实践。在本研究中,GDDS有助于解读薄层液基细胞学涂片中的HSIL,具有良好的敏感性,且与使用该系统的病理学家之间具有一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25e/11695705/02db68a32620/CNCY-133-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25e/11695705/ebbc162cca23/CNCY-133-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25e/11695705/02db68a32620/CNCY-133-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25e/11695705/ebbc162cca23/CNCY-133-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25e/11695705/02db68a32620/CNCY-133-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the sensitivity of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Pap diagnosis and interobserver variability with the Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System.使用Hologic Genius数字诊断系统分析高级别鳞状上皮内病变巴氏诊断的敏感性及观察者间差异。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2025 Jan;133(1):e22918. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22918. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Diagnostic performance of the hologic genius digital diagnostics system for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) ThinPrep papanicolaou tests.Hologic Genius数字诊断系统对低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)的液基薄层巴氏试验的诊断性能。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2025 May-Jun;14(3):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2025.01.003. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
3
Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.在一家三级军事医疗中心实施液基薄层制片成像系统。
Cancer. 2009 Aug 25;117(4):264-70. doi: 10.1002/cncy.20033.
4
Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.p16免疫组化在评估高危巴氏试验结果后宫颈活检阴性中的应用
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Jan;42(1):69-75. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000960.
5
Performance of specific morphologic features in distinguishing low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions from high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in borderline cases: a College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee multiobserver study.特定形态特征在鉴别交界性低级别鳞状上皮内病变与高级别鳞状上皮内病变中的表现:美国病理学家学会细胞病理学委员会多观察者研究。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2022 Mar-Apr;11(2):102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
6
Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on Papanicolaou test: follow-up rates and stratification of risk for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.巴氏涂片检查中的低级别鳞状上皮内病变:高级别鳞状上皮内病变的随访率和风险分层。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Jul-Aug;9(4):258-265. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
7
Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot rule out high-grade lesion: Diagnosis, histological outcomes and human papillomavirus results.低级别鳞状上皮内病变,不能排除高级别病变:诊断、组织学结果及人乳头瘤病毒检测结果
Cytopathology. 2019 Jan;30(1):99-104. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12629. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
8
Silent High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Atypical Smears from Liquid Based Cervical Cytology - Three Years Experience in Thammasat University Hospital.泰国国立法政大学医院三年经验:液基宫颈细胞学非典型涂片检测中的沉默性高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(9):4353-4356.
9
Endocervical glandular involvement is associated with an increased detection rate of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on the Papanicolaou test.宫颈腺上皮受累与巴氏涂片检查中高级别鳞状上皮内病变的检出率增加有关。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 May-Jun;9(3):137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
10
HPV detection rates and histopathologic follow-up of patients with HSIL cytology in a large academic women's hospital laboratory.在一家大型学术女性医院实验室中,对 HSIL 细胞学患者进行 HPV 检测率和组织病理学随访。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):550-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the efficacy and accuracy of cervical cytology screening with the Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System.使用Hologic Genius数字诊断系统评估宫颈细胞学筛查的有效性和准确性。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2025 Jul;133(7):e70022. doi: 10.1002/cncy.70022.
2
Double-Multiplex Immunostainings for Immune Profiling of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Emerging Novel Immune-Based Biomarkers.用于浸润性乳腺癌免疫谱分析的双重多重免疫染色:新兴的基于免疫的新型生物标志物
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 21;26(7):2838. doi: 10.3390/ijms26072838.
3
Advancements in Digital Cytopathology Since COVID-19: Insights from a Narrative Review of Review Articles.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of AI-assisted ThinPrep® Pap test screening using the Genius Digital Diagnostics System.使用Genius数字诊断系统对人工智能辅助的ThinPrep®巴氏试验筛查进行验证。
J Pathol Inform. 2024 Jul 2;15:100391. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100391. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Assessment of Efficacy and Accuracy of Cervical Cytology Screening With Artificial Intelligence Assistive System.人工智能辅助系统在宫颈细胞学筛查中的功效和准确性评估。
Mod Pathol. 2024 Jun;37(6):100486. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100486. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
3
Digital cytology part 2: artificial intelligence in cytology: a concept paper with review and recommendations from the American Society of Cytopathology Digital Cytology Task Force.
自新冠疫情以来数字细胞病理学的进展:来自综述文章的叙述性综述见解
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;13(6):657. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060657.
数字细胞学第 2 部分:细胞学中的人工智能:美国细胞病理学学会数字细胞学工作组的概念文件,附有评论和建议。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2024 Mar-Apr;13(2):97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
4
Digital cytology part 1: digital cytology implementation for practice: a concept paper with review and recommendations from the American Society of Cytopathology Digital Cytology Task Force.数字细胞学第 1 部分:实践中的数字细胞学实施:美国细胞病理学学会数字细胞学工作组的概念文件,附有综述和建议。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2024 Mar-Apr;13(2):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2023.11.006. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
5
Comparison of the Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System with the ThinPrep Imaging System-A retrospective assessment.Hologic Genius 数字诊断系统与 ThinPrep 成像系统的比较——一项回顾性评估。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Jul;131(7):424-432. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22695. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
Improving the Accuracy and Efficiency of Abnormal Cervical Squamous Cell Detection With Cytologist-in-the-Loop Artificial Intelligence.利用细胞病理学家辅助的人工智能提高异常宫颈鳞状细胞检测的准确性和效率。
Mod Pathol. 2023 Aug;36(8):100186. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100186. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
7
Artificial Intelligence-driven Digital Cytology-based Cervical Cancer Screening: Is the Time Ripe to Adopt This Disruptive Technology in Resource-constrained Settings? A Literature Review.人工智能驱动的数字细胞学宫颈癌筛查:在资源有限的环境中采用这种颠覆性技术是否时机成熟?文献综述。
J Digit Imaging. 2023 Aug;36(4):1643-1652. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00821-0. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
8
Two Years of Cytology and HPV Co-Testing in Germany: Initial Experience.德国两年的细胞学和人乳头瘤病毒联合检测:初步经验
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Aug 16;82(12):1378-1386. doi: 10.1055/a-1886-3311. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Improving the Pap test with artificial intelligence.利用人工智能改进巴氏试验。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Jun;130(6):402-404. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22561. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
10
Hybrid AI-assistive diagnostic model permits rapid TBS classification of cervical liquid-based thin-layer cell smears.混合人工智能辅助诊断模型可实现宫颈液基薄层细胞涂片的快速TBS分类。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 10;12(1):3541. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23913-3.