Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research & Technology Hellas, Heraklion, Greece.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Jul;4:647-656. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00015.
Capitalizing on the promise of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), electronic implementations of PROs (ePROs) are expected to play an important role in the development of novel digital health interventions targeting palliative cancer care. We performed a systematic and mapping review of the scientific literature on the current ePRO-based approaches used for palliative cancer care.
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines, the conducted review answered the research questions: "What are the current ePRO-based approaches for palliative cancer care; what is their contribution/value in the domain of palliative cancer care; and what are the potential gaps, challenges, and opportunities for further research?" After a screening step, the corpus of included articles indexed in PubMed or the Web of Science underwent full text review, which mapped the articles across 15 predefined axes.
The corpus of 24 mapped studies includes 9 study protocols, 7 technical tools/solutions, 7 pilot/feasibility/acceptability studies, and 1 evaluation study. The review of the corpus revealed (1) an archetype of ePRO-enabled interventions for palliative cancer care, which most commonly use ePROs as study end point assessment instruments rather than integral intervention components; (2) the fact that the literature has not fully embraced the modern definitions that expand the scope of palliative care; (3) the striking shortage of promising ubiquitous computing devices (eg, smart activity trackers); and (4) emerging evidence about the benefits of narrowing down the target cancer population, especially when combined with modern patient-centered intervention design methodologies.
Although research on exploiting ePROs for the development of digital palliative cancer care interventions is considerably active and demonstrates several successful cases, there is considerable room for improvement along the directions of the aforementioned findings.
利用患者报告结局(PRO)的优势,电子实施的 PRO(ePRO)有望在开发针对姑息治疗癌症护理的新型数字健康干预措施方面发挥重要作用。我们对目前用于姑息治疗癌症护理的基于 ePRO 的方法进行了系统和映射综述。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目声明指南,进行的综述回答了以下研究问题:“姑息治疗癌症护理的当前基于 ePRO 的方法有哪些;它们在姑息治疗癌症护理领域的贡献/价值是什么;以及进一步研究的潜在差距、挑战和机会是什么?”经过筛选步骤后,索引在 PubMed 或 Web of Science 中的包含文章的语料库进行了全文审查,该审查将文章映射到 15 个预定义轴上。
24 篇映射研究的语料库包括 9 项研究方案、7 项技术工具/解决方案、7 项试点/可行性/可接受性研究和 1 项评估研究。对语料库的审查揭示了(1)一种姑息治疗癌症护理的 ePRO 启用干预的原型,该原型最常用于将 ePRO 作为研究终点评估工具,而不是作为综合干预组件;(2)文献尚未完全接受扩展姑息治疗范围的现代定义这一事实;(3)具有前景的普遍计算设备(例如智能活动追踪器)的严重短缺;(4)关于缩小目标癌症人群的益处的新兴证据,尤其是当与现代以患者为中心的干预设计方法相结合时。
尽管利用 ePRO 开发数字姑息治疗癌症护理干预措施的研究相当活跃,并展示了一些成功案例,但在上述发现的方向上仍有很大的改进空间。