Bouobda Georges T, Gonzalez Carmen E, Phipps Ron A, Middleton Lavinia P
Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Oncol Ther. 2020 Dec;8(2):277-284. doi: 10.1007/s40487-020-00118-0. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
Cancer patients are immunosuppressed and may present to an emergency department with atypical symptoms. In the emergency setting, it is important ascertain rapidly if lactic acid levels are high, either due to sepsis or tumor lysis syndrome, to effectively manage symptoms. Therefore, it is critical to determine the blood lactic acid level to timely identify who is at risk of sepsis and provide early intervention. We have compared blood lactic acid concentrations (BLAC) in cancer patients obtained by point-of-care testing (POCT) and those measured by laboratory analysis in blood samples drawn within a short time of each other.
This was a retrospective study in cancer patients whose BLAC had been determined by POCT and laboratory analysis. Only those patients who had blood withdrawn for both testing methods within a 2-h timeframe were included in the study. Regressions were performed together with an analysis categorizing the BLAC from both testing methods.
A total of 274 patients met the criteria for the study. The BLAC from POCT correlated well with the values from laboratory testing (R = 0.925). Categorization of BLAC showed that 88.32% of the patients had BLAC that directly matched between the two tests; 28 (10.22%) patients had a normal BLAC according to laboratory analysis but a high BLAC on POCT; and four (1.46%) patients had a high BLAC according laboratory analysis but normal BLAC on POCT.
There was a high correlation between POCT and laboratory analysis values of BLAC in cancer patients, with the results from both testing methods agreeing 96% of the time. This finding suggests that POCT would suffice in most cases. Importantly, in 2% of the cancer patients who presented emergently, BLAC determined by POCT and laboratory analysis did not agree. Therefore, in subsequent decision-making, we recommend that if sepsis is suspected and BLAC determined by POCT is normal, nucleic acids, proteins, circulating cells, and interleukin-3 levels should also be obtained by POCT to confirm sepsis and/or rule out tumor lysis syndrome in patients with cancer.
癌症患者免疫功能低下,可能会因非典型症状前往急诊科就诊。在急诊情况下,迅速确定乳酸水平是否升高(无论是由于脓毒症还是肿瘤溶解综合征)对于有效控制症状非常重要。因此,确定血乳酸水平以及时识别脓毒症风险患者并提供早期干预至关重要。我们比较了通过即时检验(POCT)获得的癌症患者血乳酸浓度(BLAC)与在短时间内采集的血样通过实验室分析测得的血乳酸浓度。
这是一项针对通过POCT和实验室分析测定了BLAC的癌症患者的回顾性研究。只有那些在2小时内通过两种检测方法都采集了血样的患者才被纳入研究。进行了回归分析,并对两种检测方法的BLAC进行了分类分析。
共有274名患者符合研究标准。POCT测得的BLAC与实验室检测值相关性良好(R = 0.925)。BLAC分类显示,88.32%的患者在两种检测中BLAC直接匹配;28名(10.22%)患者根据实验室分析BLAC正常,但POCT检测显示BLAC升高;4名(1.46%)患者根据实验室分析BLAC升高,但POCT检测显示BLAC正常。
癌症患者POCT与实验室分析的BLAC值之间具有高度相关性,两种检测方法的结果在96%的情况下一致。这一发现表明,在大多数情况下POCT就足够了。重要的是,在2%紧急就诊的癌症患者中,POCT和实验室分析测定的BLAC不一致。因此,在后续决策中,我们建议,如果怀疑脓毒症且POCT测定的BLAC正常,还应通过POCT检测核酸、蛋白质、循环细胞和白细胞介素-3水平,以确认癌症患者是否患有脓毒症和/或排除肿瘤溶解综合征。