Pharmacy Course, Anhanguera Faculty, Campinas, Brazil.
Oswaldo Cruz German Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jan;55(1):152-162. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00201-8. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
The purpose of this review was to identify apps to support the HCV treatment and perform a quality assessment. A comprehensive search was conducted until February 2020 in Apple App Store (iOs) and Google Play Store (Android) using search term such "hepatitis", "hepatology", and "HCV". Two independent authors identified the apps and performed data extraction and quality assessment using Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Spearman's correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationships between user's star ratings found in the app stores and quality app defined by the MARS instrument. A total of 316 potential apps were identified, of which 12 apps fully met the eligibility criteria. Most apps were available in both App Stores and developed by commercial developers for healthcare provider. Almost all of apps were updated within the last two year and received 3.7 or above star ratings from users. Overall, only one app was considered with a good quality. The average scores for objective and subjective MARS quality of these apps were 3.54 (SD = 0.65) and 3.27 (SD = 0.76), respectively. Moreover, a majority of apps received objective scores between 3.29 and 4.37/5. However, MARS items such "interactivity", "visual appeal", "quality information", and "credibility" obtained minimum acceptable scores. MARS scores were not significantly correlation the user's star ratings. This systematic search found gaps in apps to support the HCV treatment; 12 apps were identified in this study and only one app achieved a good quality. There is a need that users use these apps cautiously as well as involve expert healthcare professionals in the development of new HCV apps.
本研究旨在确定支持 HCV 治疗的应用程序并对其进行质量评估。在 2020 年 2 月之前,我们在苹果应用商店(iOS)和谷歌应用商店(Android)中使用“肝炎”、“肝脏病学”和“HCV”等搜索词进行了全面搜索。两位独立作者确定了应用程序,并使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)进行了数据提取和质量评估。使用 Spearman 相关分析来分析应用程序商店中用户星级评分与 MARS 仪器定义的优质应用程序之间的关系。共确定了 316 个潜在应用程序,其中 12 个应用程序完全符合入选标准。大多数应用程序都可以在两个应用商店中使用,且由医疗保健提供者的商业开发者开发。几乎所有应用程序都在过去两年内进行了更新,并且获得了用户 3.7 分或以上的星级评分。总体而言,仅有一个应用程序被认为具有良好的质量。这些应用程序的客观和主观 MARS 质量的平均得分为 3.54(SD=0.65)和 3.27(SD=0.76)。此外,大多数应用程序获得了 3.29 至 4.37/5 的客观评分。然而,MARS 项目如“交互性”、“视觉吸引力”、“质量信息”和“可信度”的得分低于最低可接受分数。MARS 评分与用户星级评分无显著相关性。本系统搜索发现,支持 HCV 治疗的应用程序存在差距;本研究共确定了 12 个应用程序,仅有一个应用程序达到了良好的质量。用户在使用这些应用程序时需要谨慎,并需要让医疗保健专业人员参与新的 HCV 应用程序的开发。