Suppr超能文献

去中心度量表的元认知过程:特质和状态版本的开发和初步验证。

The Metacognitive Processes of Decentering Scale: Development and initial validation of trait and state versions.

机构信息

College of Social Work.

Observing Minds Lab.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2020 Oct;32(10):956-971. doi: 10.1037/pas0000931. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

Abstract

The ability to decenter from internal experiences is important for mental health. Consequently, improving decentering is a common therapeutic target, particularly for mindfulness-based interventions. However, extant decentering measures are limited as they fail to directly assess all 3 metacognitive processes recently theorized to subserve decentering. We thus conducted 4 studies to develop and test the Metacognitive Processes of Decentering-Trait (MPoD-t) and State (MPoD-s) scales. Consistent with the metacognitive processes model, exploratory factor analysis ( = 355) and then bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling ( = 275) indicated the MPoD-t was composed of three independent yet interrelated lower-order factors, metaawareness, (dis)identification with internal experience, and (non)reactivity to internal experience, which subserved an emergent, higher-order, decentering factor. We next found evidence of the MPoD-t's convergent validity; as well as known-groups criterion validity, wherein mindfulness practitioners reported higher MPoD-t scores than nonpractitioners. Item response theory analyses were then used to identify a subset of 3 MPoD-t items for the MPoD-s. Finally, we found evidence that the MPoD-s was sensitive to changes in state decentering following a brief mindfulness induction relative to an active control condition; and that MPoD-s changes mediated the effect of mindfulness on levels of pain and related outcomes among a sample of preoperative surgery patients ( = 82). These studies indicate the trait and state versions of the MPoD may prove useful for the study of decentering and its constituent metacognitive processes. As such, the MPoD may help advance our understanding of how the metacognitive processes of decentering support mental health and well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

从内部体验中转移注意力的能力对心理健康很重要。因此,改善去中心化是一种常见的治疗目标,尤其是对于基于正念的干预措施。然而,现有的去中心化措施是有限的,因为它们没有直接评估最近被理论化为支持去中心化的所有 3 种元认知过程。因此,我们进行了 4 项研究来开发和测试元认知去中心化特质(MPoD-t)和状态(MPoD-s)量表。与元认知过程模型一致,探索性因素分析(n = 355)和双因素探索性结构方程建模(n = 275)表明,MPoD-t 由三个独立但相互关联的低阶因素组成,分别是元意识、(与内部经验的)认同和(对内部经验的)不反应,这些因素支持一个新兴的、高阶的去中心化因素。我们接下来发现了 MPoD-t 的收敛有效性的证据;以及已知组标准有效性的证据,即正念实践者报告的 MPoD-t 得分高于非实践者。项目反应理论分析随后用于从 MPoD-t 中确定 3 个 MPoD-t 项目的子集。最后,我们发现证据表明,与主动对照条件相比,MPoD-s 对正念引起的状态去中心化变化敏感;并且 MPoD-s 的变化中介了正念对手术前患者样本中疼痛水平及相关结果的影响(n = 82)。这些研究表明,MPoD 的特质和状态版本可能有助于去中心化及其组成元认知过程的研究。因此,MPoD 可能有助于我们理解去中心化的元认知过程如何支持心理健康和幸福感。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

3
Metacognitive processes model of decentering: emerging methods and insights.元认知过程离解模型:新兴方法与见解。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Aug;28:245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
Mindful meta-awareness: sustained and non-propositional.正念元意识:持续且非命题的。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Aug;28:307-311. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Metacognitive processes model of decentering: emerging methods and insights.元认知过程离解模型:新兴方法与见解。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Aug;28:245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
8
Structure and validity of measures of decentering and defusion.去中心化和解离测量的结构与效度
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jul;29(7):935-954. doi: 10.1037/pas0000405. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验