Suppr超能文献

产前微阵列中意义不确定的变异:一项回顾性队列研究。

Variants of uncertain significance in prenatal microarrays: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(2):431-438. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16427. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To categorise the variants of uncertain significance found with prenatal chromosomal microarray and determine the proportion of such variants that are associated with a well-known phenotype in order to establish how often they remain truly of uncertain significance.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The University of California, San Francisco.

POPULATION

All patients with a variant of uncertain significance on prenatal microarray between 2014 and 2018.

METHODS

Each variant was classified as a copy number variant that (a) contains Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)-annotated disease-causing genes ('OMIM morbid genes'); (b) confers autosomal recessive carrier status; (c) is associated with incomplete penetrance; (d) is >1 Mb in size without OMIM morbid genes; (e) demonstrates mosaicism; or (f) contains significant regions of homozygosity. For each variant of uncertain significance, we examined the existing literature to determine whether the predicted phenotype(s) was known.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Prevalence and classification of variants and how much information is available regarding the likelihood of an affected phenotype.

RESULTS

Of 970 prenatal microarrays, 55 (5.8%) had at least one variant of uncertain significance. The most common were copy number variants containing OMIM morbid genes (36.8%). In all, 48 (84.2%) were associated with a known phenotype; 55 (96.5%) had data available regarding the likelihood of an affected phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of variants of uncertain significance with prenatal microarray was 5.8%. In the large majority of cases, data were available regarding the predicted phenotype.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Variants of uncertain significance occur in 5.8% of prenatal microarrays. In the overwhelming majority of cases, outcome information is available.

摘要

目的

对产前染色体微阵列检测发现的意义不明的变异进行分类,并确定与已知表型相关的此类变异的比例,以确定它们在多大程度上仍然存在真正的意义不明。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校。

人群

2014 年至 2018 年间产前微阵列检查中发现意义不明变异的所有患者。

方法

将每个变异分为以下几类:(a)包含在线孟德尔遗传数据库(OMIM)中注释的致病基因的拷贝数变异(“OMIM 病态基因”);(b)赋予常染色体隐性携带者状态;(c)具有不完全外显率;(d)大小大于 1Mb 但无 OMIM 病态基因;(e)表现为嵌合体;或(f)含有显著的纯合区域。对于每个意义不明的变异,我们查阅了现有文献,以确定预测的表型是否已知。

主要观察指标

变异的流行率和分类,以及有关表型出现可能性的信息。

结果

在 970 例产前微阵列中,有 55 例(5.8%)至少有一种意义不明的变异。最常见的是包含 OMIM 病态基因的拷贝数变异(36.8%)。在所有情况下,48 种(84.2%)与已知表型相关;55 种(96.5%)有关于表型出现可能性的数据。

结论

产前微阵列检测发现意义不明的变异的流行率为 5.8%。在绝大多数情况下,都有关于预测表型的信息。

推文摘要

产前微阵列检测发现意义不明的变异发生率为 5.8%。在绝大多数情况下,都有关于表型的结果信息。

相似文献

1
Variants of uncertain significance in prenatal microarrays: a retrospective cohort study.
BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(2):431-438. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16427. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Dilemmas in genetic counseling for low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci detected on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):247.e1-247.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.559. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
3
The uncertainty of copy number variants: pregnancy decisions and clinical follow-up.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;229(2):170.e1-170.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.022. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
4
Detection of copy number variants with chromosomal microarray in 10 377 pregnancies at a single laboratory.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):775-782. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13886. Epub 2020 May 17.
6
Characteristics and mode of inheritance of pathogenic copy number variants in prenatal diagnosis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;221(5):493.e1-493.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
7
Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):287.e1-287.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 29.
8
"It's probably nothing, but…" Couples' experiences of pregnancy following an uncertain prenatal genetic result.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):791-801. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13813. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
9
The application of chromosomal microarray analysis to the prenatal diagnosis of isolated mild ventriculomegaly.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;58(2):251-254. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.01.015.

引用本文的文献

4
Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Does Increased Resolution Equal Increased Yield?
Genes (Basel). 2023 Jul 25;14(8):1519. doi: 10.3390/genes14081519.
5
Challenges in the clinical understanding of genetic testing in birth defects and pediatric diseases.
Transl Pediatr. 2023 May 30;12(5):1028-1040. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-54. Epub 2023 May 4.
7
Microdeletions and microduplications linked to severe congenital disorders in infertile men.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 11;13(1):574. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27750-w.
9
Disparities in the acceptance of chromosomal microarray at the time of prenatal genetic diagnosis.
Prenat Diagn. 2022 May;42(5):611-616. doi: 10.1002/pd.6109. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

4
Copy number variations and cognitive phenotypes in unselected populations.
JAMA. 2015 May 26;313(20):2044-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4845.
5
High-resolution chromosomal microarrays in prenatal diagnosis significantly increase diagnostic power.
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jun;34(6):525-33. doi: 10.1002/pd.4342. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
7
Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: report of first 6 months in clinical practice.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Sep;27(13):1333-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.858243. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2175-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验