• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disparities in the acceptance of chromosomal microarray at the time of prenatal genetic diagnosis.在进行产前基因诊断时,对染色体微阵列的接受程度存在差异。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 May;42(5):611-616. doi: 10.1002/pd.6109. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Chromosomal microarray use among women undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis.接受侵入性产前诊断的女性中染色体微阵列的应用情况。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Jul;36(7):656-61. doi: 10.1002/pd.4835. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
3
Prenatal chromosomal microarray uptake with invasive prenatal diagnosis: How many patients take the leap?产前染色体微阵列分析与侵袭性产前诊断的应用:有多少患者迈出了这一步?
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Sep;38(10):748-754. doi: 10.1002/pd.5324. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Association of prenatal renal ultrasound abnormalities with pathogenic copy number variants in a large Chinese cohort.中国一个大型队列中产前肾脏超声异常与致病性拷贝数变异的关联
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;59(2):226-233. doi: 10.1002/uog.23702.
5
Population-based trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis for ultrasound-based indications: two decades of change from 1994 to 2016.基于人群的超声指征下侵袭性产前诊断的趋势:1994 年至 2016 年二十年的变化。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):503-511. doi: 10.1002/uog.19107.
6
Benefit versus risk of chromosomal microarray analysis performed in pregnancies with normal and positive prenatal screening results: A retrospective study.染色体微阵列分析在正常和阳性产前筛查结果妊娠中的获益与风险:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250734. eCollection 2021.
7
Universal Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Additive Value and Clinical Dilemmas in Fetuses with a Normal Karyotype.通用产前染色体微阵列分析:核型正常胎儿的附加价值与临床困境
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Mar;34(4):340-348. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1586501. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
8
Microarray and RASopathy-disorder testing in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.超声检查胎儿颈项透明层增厚与微阵列芯片和 RAS 相关疾病检测。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;55(3):383-390. doi: 10.1002/uog.20352.
9
Preferences of pregnant women for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal testing: comparison of patients' choices and those of a decision-analytic model.孕妇对羊膜穿刺术或绒毛取样进行产前检测的偏好:患者选择与决策分析模型选择的比较
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1215-28. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90126-0.
10
Genetic counseling practices among outpatient obstetric providers in the Northeast.东北地区妇产科门诊医生的遗传咨询实践。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Nov;5(11):101150. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101150. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in access to reproductive genetic services associated with geographic location of residence and maternal race and ethnicity.居住地的地理位置、产妇的种族和民族与获得生殖遗传服务的机会存在差异。
Genet Med. 2024 Nov;26(11):101221. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101221. Epub 2024 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Variants of uncertain significance in prenatal microarrays: a retrospective cohort study.产前微阵列中意义不确定的变异:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(2):431-438. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16427. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
The utilization of prenatal microarray: A survey of current genetic counseling practices and barriers.产前微阵列的应用:当前遗传咨询实践及障碍的调查。
Prenat Diagn. 2019 Apr;39(5):351-360. doi: 10.1002/pd.5435. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
3
Offering a choice between NIPT and invasive PND in prenatal genetic counseling: the impact of clinician characteristics on patients' test uptake.在产前遗传咨询中提供 NIPT 和侵袭性 PND 之间的选择:临床医生特征对患者检测接受度的影响。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Feb;27(2):235-243. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0287-z. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
4
Prenatal chromosomal microarray uptake with invasive prenatal diagnosis: How many patients take the leap?产前染色体微阵列分析与侵袭性产前诊断的应用:有多少患者迈出了这一步?
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Sep;38(10):748-754. doi: 10.1002/pd.5324. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Informed Decision-Making in the Context of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray.产前染色体微阵列背景下的知情决策
J Genet Couns. 2018 Sep;27(5):1130-1147. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0231-y. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
6
Microarrays in prenatal diagnosis.产前诊断中的微阵列技术。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jul;42:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
7
Committee Opinion No.682: Microarrays and Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: The Use of Advanced Genetic Diagnostic Tools in Obstetrics and Gynecology.委员会意见 No.682:微阵列和下一代测序技术:在妇产科中使用先进的遗传诊断工具。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):e262-e268. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001817.
8
Chromosomal microarray use among women undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis.接受侵入性产前诊断的女性中染色体微阵列的应用情况。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Jul;36(7):656-61. doi: 10.1002/pd.4835. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
9
Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: report of first 6 months in clinical practice.染色体微阵列分析在产前诊断中的临床应用:临床实践头6个月的报告
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Sep;27(13):1333-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.858243. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis.使用产前染色体微阵列:前瞻性队列研究及系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):610-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.12464. Epub 2013 May 7.

在进行产前基因诊断时,对染色体微阵列的接受程度存在差异。

Disparities in the acceptance of chromosomal microarray at the time of prenatal genetic diagnosis.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2022 May;42(5):611-616. doi: 10.1002/pd.6109. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1002/pd.6109
PMID:35106791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9116240/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) increases the diagnostic yield of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing but is not universally performed. Our objective was to identify provider and patient characteristics associated with the acceptance of CMA at the time of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing prenatal genetic diagnostic testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis) at a single institution between 2014 and 2020. Primary outcome was the acceptance of CMA based on the genetic counselor ,GC who saw the patient. Secondary analyses assessed patient characteristics associated with the acceptance of CMA.

RESULTS

2372 participants were included. Fifty-eight percent of participants accepted CMA. Acceptance of CMA varied significantly by GC, ranging from 31% to 90%. Patients with public insurance and those who identified as Black or Hispanic/Latina were less likely to have CMA performed (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.20-0.30, and 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92). Even among those with a structural anomaly present, public insurance was associated with significantly lower odds of CMA being performed (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptance of CMA at the time of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing varied based on the GC performing the counseling. Public insurance was associated with lower frequency of accepting CMA.

摘要

目的

染色体微阵列(CMA)提高了产前遗传诊断检测的诊断产量,但并非普遍进行。我们的目的是确定与产前遗传诊断检测时接受 CMA 相关的提供者和患者特征。

方法

对 2014 年至 2020 年期间在一家机构接受产前遗传诊断检测(绒毛膜绒毛取样或羊膜穿刺术)的患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要结局是根据为患者提供咨询服务的遗传咨询师(GC)接受 CMA 的情况。次要分析评估了与接受 CMA 相关的患者特征。

结果

共纳入 2372 名参与者。58%的参与者接受了 CMA。GC 的不同,接受 CMA 的情况存在显著差异,范围从 31%到 90%。有公共保险的患者和自认为是黑人或西班牙裔/拉丁裔的患者接受 CMA 的可能性较低(aOR 0.24,95%CI 0.20-0.30 和 0.68,95%CI 0.50-0.92)。即使在存在结构异常的患者中,公共保险与 CMA 接受率显著降低相关(aOR 0.39,95%CI 0.25-0.61)。

结论

在进行产前遗传诊断检测时,接受 CMA 的情况因进行咨询的 GC 而异。公共保险与接受 CMA 的频率较低相关。