Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Germany.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Oct;174:107280. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107280. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
Often the source of information is as important as the information itself. The present study examined the impact of contextual threat and safety signals (source information) on memory encoding and recognition of faces (item information). In two experimental sessions, 30 participants viewed neutral face pictures. In the encoding session, 60 faces were presented with contextual background colors (blue or green, 30 pictures each) which were verbally instructed to signal either threat-of-shock or safety. In the recognition session, the 60 old faces intermixed with 30 new faces were shown while a combined old/new recognition and source memory task was performed. During the encoding session, face processing varied as a function of contextual source information. Confirming successful threat-of-shock manipulation, threatening compared to safe face-context compounds revealed differential neural processing (early parieto-occipital and late fronto-central negativity) as well as pronounced threat ratings. During the recognition session, participants had serious problems identifying old from new faces with poor source memory. Intriguingly, however, brain activity differentiated previously seen faces from newly presented pictures (old/new ERP effect). Moreover, old faces presented within a threat context were associated with distributed late negativities compared to old safe faces. Thus, threat effects not only emerged during face encoding (incidental learning) but also during face recognition, although no valid judgements could be made regarding the threatening or safe sources. These findings support the notion that contextual source information critically modulates person perception and recognition as a form of an expectation based remembering in the absence of conscious recognition.
信息的来源与信息本身同样重要。本研究考察了语境威胁和安全信号(来源信息)对人脸的记忆编码和识别(项目信息)的影响。在两个实验中,30 名参与者观看了中性人脸图片。在编码阶段,60 张人脸呈现出蓝色或绿色的背景色(各 30 张),并口头指示这些背景色表示威胁性或安全性。在识别阶段,60 张旧面孔与 30 张新面孔混合在一起展示,同时进行了旧/新面孔识别和源记忆任务。在编码阶段,面部处理随语境源信息而变化。证实了威胁性冲击的成功操纵,与安全的人脸语境组合相比,威胁性的人脸语境组合显示出不同的神经处理(早期顶枕部和晚期额-中央负性)和明显的威胁评级。在识别阶段,参与者在识别新老面孔方面存在严重问题,源记忆较差。然而,有趣的是,大脑活动区分了之前看到的面孔和新呈现的图片(旧/新 ERP 效应)。此外,与安全的旧面孔相比,在威胁语境中呈现的旧面孔与分布式晚期负性相关。因此,威胁效应不仅在面部编码(偶然学习)期间出现,而且在面部识别期间也出现,尽管对于威胁或安全来源无法做出有效判断。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即语境源信息批判性地调节了对人的感知和识别,作为一种基于期望的记忆形式,而无需有意识的识别。