The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Independent Lived Experience Researcher, London, UK.
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Dec;23(4):743-752. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09961-4.
People experiencing mental distress and illness are frequently on the receiving end of stigma, epistemic injustice, and social isolation. A range of strategies are required to alleviate the subsequent marginalisation. We ran a series 'philosophy of mind' workshops, in partnership with a third-sector mental health organisation with the aim of using philosophical techniques to challenge mental health stigma and build resources for self-understanding and advocacy. Participants were those with lived experience of mental distress, or unusual beliefs and experiences; mental health advocates; and mental health service providers (such as counsellors, psychologists and psychiatrists). We draw on a shared perspective as a participant and facilitator of the workshop series to assess their impact. We discuss the following benefits: (i) the opportunity for structured discussion of experiences and models; (ii) dialogue across different mental health backgrounds; (iii) the potential to reduce self-stigma and to increase self-understanding and advocacy; and (iv) the potential to alleviate (some) epistemic injustice. We invite researchers and mental health practitioners to consider further opportunities to investigate the potential benefits of philosophy groups in mental health settings to establish whether they generalise.
经历心理困扰和疾病的人经常受到污名、认知不公正和社会孤立的影响。需要采取一系列策略来减轻随之而来的边缘化。我们与第三部门心理健康组织合作举办了一系列“思维哲学”研讨会,旨在利用哲学技巧来挑战心理健康污名,并为自我理解和宣传建立资源。参与者是那些有心理困扰、异常信仰和经历的人;心理健康倡导者;以及心理健康服务提供者(如顾问、心理学家和精神科医生)。我们借鉴了作为研讨会系列参与者和促进者的共同观点来评估其影响。我们讨论了以下好处:(i)有机会对经验和模型进行结构化讨论;(ii)在不同心理健康背景下进行对话;(iii)有可能减少自我污名,并增加自我理解和宣传;以及(iv)减轻(一些)认知不公正的潜力。我们邀请研究人员和心理健康从业者考虑进一步探索哲学团体在心理健康环境中的潜在好处,以确定它们是否具有普遍性。