All authors: Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;48(9):1365-1374. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004496.
Checkpoint inhibitors have been proposed for sepsis following reports of increased checkpoint molecule expression in septic patients. To determine whether clinical studies investigating checkpoint molecule expression provide strong evidence supporting trials of checkpoint inhibitors for sepsis.
PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, inception through October 2019.
Studies comparing checkpoint molecule expression in septic patients versus healthy controls or critically ill nonseptic patients or in sepsis nonsurvivors versus survivors.
Two investigators extracted data and evaluated study quality.
Thirty-six studies were retrieved. Across 26 studies, compared with healthy controls, septic patients had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased CD4+ lymphocyte programmed death-1 and monocyte programmed death-ligand-1 expression in most studies. Other checkpoint molecule expressions were variable and studied less frequently. Across 11 studies, compared with critically ill nonseptic, septic patients had significantly increased checkpoint molecule expression in three or fewer studies. Septic patients had higher severity of illness scores, comorbidities, and mortality in three studies providing analysis. Across 12 studies, compared with septic survivors, nonsurvivors had significantly increased expression of any checkpoint molecule on any cell type in five or fewer studies. Of all 36 studies, none adjusted for nonseptic covariates reported to increase checkpoint molecule expression.
Although sepsis may increase some checkpoint molecule expression compared with healthy controls, the data are limited and inconsistent. Further, data from the more informative patient comparisons are potentially confounded by severity of illness. These clinical checkpoint molecule expression studies do not yet provide a strong rationale for trials of checkpoint inhibitor therapy for sepsis.
有报道称,脓毒症患者的检查点分子表达增加,因此提出了检查点抑制剂用于脓毒症。本研究旨在确定检查点分子表达的临床研究是否为检查点抑制剂治疗脓毒症的试验提供了有力证据。
PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science,检索时间为 2019 年 10 月以前。
比较脓毒症患者与健康对照者、重症非脓毒症患者或脓毒症幸存者与非幸存者检查点分子表达的研究。
两位研究者提取数据并评价研究质量。
共检索到 36 项研究。在 26 项研究中,与健康对照者相比,大多数研究显示,与健康对照者相比,脓毒症患者 CD4+淋巴细胞程序性死亡受体 1 和单核细胞程序性死亡配体 1 的表达显著增加(p≤0.05)。其他检查点分子的表达则存在差异,研究较少。在 11 项研究中,与重症非脓毒症患者相比,在 3 项或更少的研究中,脓毒症患者的检查点分子表达显著增加。在 3 项提供分析的研究中,脓毒症患者的疾病严重程度评分、合并症和死亡率较高。在 12 项研究中,与脓毒症幸存者相比,在 5 项或更少的研究中,非幸存者的任何细胞类型的任何检查点分子表达均显著增加。在所有 36 项研究中,没有一项研究调整了已知会增加检查点分子表达的非脓毒症混杂因素。
尽管与健康对照者相比,脓毒症可能会增加某些检查点分子的表达,但目前的数据有限且不一致。此外,来自更具信息性的患者比较的数据可能因疾病严重程度而受到混淆。这些临床检查点分子表达研究尚未为检查点抑制剂治疗脓毒症的试验提供强有力的依据。