Suppr超能文献

污水消毒:过氧乙酸与过氧乙酸和氯的长期实验室和全规模比较研究。

Wastewater disinfection: long-term laboratory and full-scale studies on performic acid in comparison with peracetic acid and chlorine.

机构信息

VERITAS S.p.A., Santa Croce 489, 30135 Venice, Italy.

VERITAS S.p.A., Santa Croce 489, 30135 Venice, Italy.

出版信息

Water Res. 2020 Oct 1;184:116169. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116169. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

Abstract

Chemical disinfection of municipal wastewater to preserve the microbiological quality of discharges has traditionally relied on chlorine, and more recently on peracetic acid (PAA). A more recent option is performic acid (PFA). This work uses laboratory and full-scale studies over a span of 15 years and five wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Italy, to compare the efficacy of these three disinfectants and identify the differences among peracids in a context where both can be an alternative to chlorine. The investigations focused on treatment effectiveness and bacterial inactivation kinetics using E. coli and the more resistant enterococci, as well as on PFA and PAA decomposition as the residuals may affect the downstream microenvironment. Furthermore, the potential for the two peracids to oxidize organic substances and create troublesome byproducts was also studied. Chlorine, applied as hypochlorite ("HYP") and here essentially functioning as chloramines, was used as a baseline comparison for the two peracids. Appropriate statistical tests were applied to the data from different WWTPs to account for potential interferences and compounding effects of the different matrices. Average doses of 0.8, 2.9 and 1.4 mg/L and contact times of 18, 21 and 31 min, respectively for PFA, chlorine and PAA guaranteed with a high level of assurance the 5000 CFU/100 mL E. coli limit; the order of effectiveness was PFA > HYP > PAA, refined as PFA > HYP ≈ PAA against E. coli and PFA ≈ HYP > PAA with enterococci. Similar bacterial reductions for the peracids were found at higher disinfectant doses used for the kinetic tests. PFA decayed more quickly than PAA. The first-order decay constants were 0.031 and 0.007 min, respectively, suggesting that disinfection residuals when PFA is used may be less of a concern than with PAA. This faster decomposition did not affect the PFA oxidation power on estrone, which was as weak as that of PAA.

摘要

市政污水的化学消毒传统上依赖于氯,最近则依赖于过氧乙酸 (PAA)。最近的选择是过甲酸 (PFA)。这项工作使用了 15 年来在意大利的五个污水处理厂 (WWTP) 的实验室和全规模研究,比较了这三种消毒剂的效果,并确定了在两者都可以替代氯的情况下,过氧酸之间的差异。研究重点是使用大肠杆菌和更具抗性的肠球菌的处理效果和细菌灭活动力学,以及过甲酸和过氧乙酸的分解,因为残留物可能会影响下游的微环境。此外,还研究了两种过酸氧化有机物质并产生麻烦副产物的潜力。氯作为次氯酸盐 ("HYP") 施加,在这里主要作为氯胺起作用,用作两种过酸的基线比较。对来自不同 WWTP 的数据应用了适当的统计检验,以考虑不同基质的潜在干扰和复合效应。对于 PFA、氯和 PAA,分别保证了 5000 CFU/100 mL 大肠杆菌限值的平均剂量为 0.8、2.9 和 1.4 mg/L,接触时间分别为 18、21 和 31 min;效果顺序为 PFA > HYP > PAA,在大肠杆菌方面细化为 PFA > HYP ≈ PAA,而在肠球菌方面则为 PFA ≈ HYP > PAA。在用于动力学测试的更高消毒剂剂量下,发现过酸具有相似的细菌减少。PFA 的衰减速度比 PAA 快。一级衰减常数分别为 0.031 和 0.007 min,这表明与 PAA 相比,使用 PFA 时的消毒残留物可能不太令人担忧。这种更快的分解不会影响 PFA 对雌酮的氧化能力,其强度与 PAA 相同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验