Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet, Building 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet, Building 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 10;677:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.350. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
The ecotoxicological evaluation of combined sewer overflow (CSO) disinfectants, with their degradation products, is important for ensuring safe use. For this form of toxicity, data for organisms representing different trophic levels are needed. We studied the toxicity of the alternative disinfectants peracetic acid (PAA), performic acid (PFA) and chlorine dioxide (ClO) and their degradation products hydrogen peroxide (HO) and chlorite (ClO) on Vibrio fischeri and Daphnia magna. ClO was more toxic to D. magna (EC < 0.09 mg/L) and PFA was most toxic to V. fischeri (EC 0.24 mg/L). EC of PFA, PAA, ClO, HO and ClO on D. magna were 0.85, 0.78, <0.09, 3.46 and 0.36 mg/L, respectively. Similarly, EC of PFA, PAA, ClO, HO and ClO on V. fischeri were 0.24, 0.42, 1.10, 5.67 and 30.93 mg/L, respectively. For both PFA and ClO, the degradation in water was faster than for PAA, HO and chlorite. Using these data together with literature values, we derived environmental quality standards. By combining these with typical concentrations of disinfectants used for CSOs, we estimated the dilution required for discharging CSOs after disinfection, which can be used for quick assessment of the environmental feasibility of disinfection systems at specific CSO sites. Minimal dilutions in the receiving water, in the orders of 44, 70 or 138-fold, are needed for ClO, PFA and PAA, respectively. This highlights PFA as the most widely applicable disinfectant, taking into account both its efficiency and the lower risk of unwanted environmental effects.
对合流制污水溢流(CSO)消毒剂及其降解产物进行生态毒理学评价,对于确保安全使用至关重要。对于这种形式的毒性,需要有代表不同营养级别的生物体的数据。我们研究了替代消毒剂过氧乙酸(PAA)、过甲酸(PFA)和二氧化氯(ClO)及其降解产物过氧化氢(HO)和亚氯酸盐(ClO)对发光菌和大型蚤的毒性。ClO 对大型蚤的毒性更大(EC<0.09mg/L),而 PFA 对发光菌的毒性最大(EC0.24mg/L)。PFA、PAA、ClO、HO 和 ClO 对大型蚤的 EC 值分别为 0.85、0.78、<0.09、3.46 和 0.36mg/L。类似地,PFA、PAA、ClO、HO 和 ClO 对发光菌的 EC 值分别为 0.24、0.42、1.10、5.67 和 30.93mg/L。对于 PFA 和 ClO,其在水中的降解速度快于 PAA、HO 和亚氯酸盐。将这些数据与文献值结合使用,我们得出了环境质量标准。通过将这些标准与用于 CSO 的消毒剂的典型浓度结合使用,我们估算了在消毒后排放 CSO 所需的稀释倍数,可用于快速评估特定 CSO 地点的消毒系统的环境可行性。ClO、PFA 和 PAA 分别需要在受纳水中进行 44、70 或 138 倍的最小稀释,这突出了 PFA 作为最广泛适用的消毒剂,同时考虑到其效率和较低的环境影响风险。