Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Community Trauma Institute, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Am Surg. 2023 Nov;89(11):4625-4631. doi: 10.1177/00031348221111515. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Complex follow-up plans for polytrauma patients are compiled at the end of hospitalization into discharge instructions. We sought to identify how often patient discharge instructions incorrectly communicated specialist recommendations. We hypothesized that patients with more complex hospitalizations would have more discharge instruction errors (DI-errors).
We reviewed adult trauma inpatients (March 2017-March 2018), excluding those who left against medical advice or were expected to follow up outside our system. Complex hospitalizations were represented using injury severity (ISS), hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit length of stay (iLOS), and number of consultants (NC). We recorded the type of consultant (surgical or nonsurgical), and consultant recommendations for follow-up. DI-errors were defined as either follow-up necessary but omitted or follow-up not necessary yet present on the instructions. Patients with DI-errors were compared to patients without DI-errors. Groups were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-square (alpha <.05).
We included 392 patients (median age 45 [IQR 26-58], ISS 14 [10-21], LOS 6 [3-11]). 55 patients (14%) had DI-errors. Factors associated with DI-errors included the total number of consultants and use of nonsurgical consultants. ISS, LOS, iLOS, were not associated with DI-errors.
Common measures of admission complexity were not associated with DI-errors, although the number and type of consultants were associated with DI-errors. Non-surgical specialty consultant recommendations were more likely to be omitted. It is crucial for patients to receive accurate discharge instructions, and systematic processes are needed to improve communication with the patients at discharge.
对于多发伤患者,在住院结束时会将复杂的随访计划编制为出院指导。我们旨在确定出院指导传达专科医生建议的错误频率。我们假设住院情况越复杂,出院指导错误(DI-errors)就越多。
我们回顾了 2017 年 3 月至 2018 年 3 月期间的成年创伤住院患者(排除那些因医嘱拒绝留院或预计在我院系统外进行随访的患者)。复杂住院情况通过损伤严重度评分(ISS)、住院时间(LOS)、重症监护病房时间(iLOS)和顾问人数(NC)来表示。我们记录了顾问的类型(手术或非手术)以及顾问对随访的建议。DI-errors 定义为遗漏了需要随访的情况或指令中出现了不必要的随访建议。将有 DI-errors 的患者与无 DI-errors 的患者进行比较。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验或卡方检验(alpha <.05)比较两组。
我们纳入了 392 名患者(中位数年龄 45 [IQR 26-58],ISS 14 [10-21],LOS 6 [3-11])。55 名患者(14%)存在 DI-errors。与 DI-errors 相关的因素包括顾问总数和非手术顾问的使用。ISS、LOS、iLOS 与 DI-errors 无关。
常见的入院复杂性衡量指标与 DI-errors 无关,尽管顾问人数和类型与 DI-errors 相关。非手术专科顾问的建议更有可能被遗漏。确保患者获得准确的出院指导至关重要,需要有系统的流程来改善与患者的出院沟通。