Munro Thomas, Miller Catherine M, Antunes Elsa, Sharma Dileep
College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, 14-88 McGregor Road, Smithfield 4878, QLD, Australia.
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, 14-88 McGregor Road, Smithfield 4878, QLD, Australia.
J Funct Biomater. 2020 Jul 16;11(3):50. doi: 10.3390/jfb11030050.
This study compared the in vitro response of a mouse pre-osteoblast cell line on a novel sandblasted zirconia surface with that of titanium. The MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 osteoblast precursor cell line was cultured on either sandblasted titanium (SBCpTi) or sandblasted zirconia (SBY-TZP). The surface topography was analysed by three-dimensional laser microscopy and scanning electron microscope. The wettability of the discs was also assessed. The cellular response was quantified by assessing the morphology (day 1), proliferation (day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9), viability (day 1, 9), and migration (0, 6, 24 h) assays. The sandblasting surface treatment in both titanium and zirconia increased the surface roughness by rendering a defined surface topography with titanium showing more apparent nano-topography. The wettability of the two surfaces showed no significant difference. The zirconia surface resulted in improved cellular spreading and a significantly increased rate of migration compared to titanium. However, the cellular proliferation and viability noted in our experiments were not significantly different on the zirconia and titanium surfaces. The novel, roughened zirconia surface elicited cellular responses comparable to, or exceeding that, of titanium. Therefore, this novel zirconia surface may be an acceptable substitute for titanium as a dental implant material.
本研究比较了小鼠前成骨细胞系在新型喷砂氧化锆表面和钛表面的体外反应。将MC3T3-E1亚克隆4成骨细胞前体细胞系培养在喷砂钛(SBCpTi)或喷砂氧化锆(SBY-TZP)上。通过三维激光显微镜和扫描电子显微镜分析表面形貌。还评估了圆盘的润湿性。通过评估形态(第1天)、增殖(第1、3、5、7、9天)、活力(第1、9天)和迁移(0、6、24小时)试验对细胞反应进行量化。钛和氧化锆的喷砂表面处理通过呈现特定的表面形貌增加了表面粗糙度,钛显示出更明显的纳米形貌。两种表面的润湿性没有显著差异。与钛相比,氧化锆表面导致细胞铺展改善,迁移率显著提高。然而,在我们的实验中,氧化锆和钛表面的细胞增殖和活力没有显著差异。这种新型的粗糙氧化锆表面引发的细胞反应与钛相当或超过钛。因此,这种新型氧化锆表面可能是一种可接受的替代钛的牙科植入材料。