• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成骨祖细胞与新型氧化锆种植体表面的相互作用。

Interactions of Osteoprogenitor Cells with a Novel Zirconia Implant Surface.

作者信息

Munro Thomas, Miller Catherine M, Antunes Elsa, Sharma Dileep

机构信息

College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, 14-88 McGregor Road, Smithfield 4878, QLD, Australia.

College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, 14-88 McGregor Road, Smithfield 4878, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

J Funct Biomater. 2020 Jul 16;11(3):50. doi: 10.3390/jfb11030050.

DOI:10.3390/jfb11030050
PMID:32708701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7565437/
Abstract

This study compared the in vitro response of a mouse pre-osteoblast cell line on a novel sandblasted zirconia surface with that of titanium. The MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 osteoblast precursor cell line was cultured on either sandblasted titanium (SBCpTi) or sandblasted zirconia (SBY-TZP). The surface topography was analysed by three-dimensional laser microscopy and scanning electron microscope. The wettability of the discs was also assessed. The cellular response was quantified by assessing the morphology (day 1), proliferation (day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9), viability (day 1, 9), and migration (0, 6, 24 h) assays. The sandblasting surface treatment in both titanium and zirconia increased the surface roughness by rendering a defined surface topography with titanium showing more apparent nano-topography. The wettability of the two surfaces showed no significant difference. The zirconia surface resulted in improved cellular spreading and a significantly increased rate of migration compared to titanium. However, the cellular proliferation and viability noted in our experiments were not significantly different on the zirconia and titanium surfaces. The novel, roughened zirconia surface elicited cellular responses comparable to, or exceeding that, of titanium. Therefore, this novel zirconia surface may be an acceptable substitute for titanium as a dental implant material.

摘要

本研究比较了小鼠前成骨细胞系在新型喷砂氧化锆表面和钛表面的体外反应。将MC3T3-E1亚克隆4成骨细胞前体细胞系培养在喷砂钛(SBCpTi)或喷砂氧化锆(SBY-TZP)上。通过三维激光显微镜和扫描电子显微镜分析表面形貌。还评估了圆盘的润湿性。通过评估形态(第1天)、增殖(第1、3、5、7、9天)、活力(第1、9天)和迁移(0、6、24小时)试验对细胞反应进行量化。钛和氧化锆的喷砂表面处理通过呈现特定的表面形貌增加了表面粗糙度,钛显示出更明显的纳米形貌。两种表面的润湿性没有显著差异。与钛相比,氧化锆表面导致细胞铺展改善,迁移率显著提高。然而,在我们的实验中,氧化锆和钛表面的细胞增殖和活力没有显著差异。这种新型的粗糙氧化锆表面引发的细胞反应与钛相当或超过钛。因此,这种新型氧化锆表面可能是一种可接受的替代钛的牙科植入材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/3cd5ef16647f/jfb-11-00050-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/e07b5850b01b/jfb-11-00050-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/d1c55b14c20c/jfb-11-00050-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/9ad1256c6cea/jfb-11-00050-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/ebbd7996d66f/jfb-11-00050-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/69a00d274bbf/jfb-11-00050-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/8b4159bf6ab7/jfb-11-00050-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/e862e7a3b50e/jfb-11-00050-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/3cd5ef16647f/jfb-11-00050-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/e07b5850b01b/jfb-11-00050-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/d1c55b14c20c/jfb-11-00050-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/9ad1256c6cea/jfb-11-00050-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/ebbd7996d66f/jfb-11-00050-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/69a00d274bbf/jfb-11-00050-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/8b4159bf6ab7/jfb-11-00050-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/e862e7a3b50e/jfb-11-00050-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcaf/7565437/3cd5ef16647f/jfb-11-00050-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Interactions of Osteoprogenitor Cells with a Novel Zirconia Implant Surface.成骨祖细胞与新型氧化锆种植体表面的相互作用。
J Funct Biomater. 2020 Jul 16;11(3):50. doi: 10.3390/jfb11030050.
2
Biological effects of gamma-ray sterilization on 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal: An in vitro study.γ射线辐照对 3mol%氧化钇稳定四方氧化锆多晶的生物学效应:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Dec;130(6):936.e1-936.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.014. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Analysis of osteogenic potential on 3mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals and two different niobium oxide containing zirconia ceramics.3mol%氧化钇稳定四方氧化锆多晶体及两种不同含氧化铌氧化锆陶瓷的成骨潜力分析
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Apr;10(2):147-154. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.147. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
4
Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.不同表面特性氧化锆种植体的骨整合:兔体内评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):352-8.
5
Osteoblast and bone tissue response to surface modified zirconia and titanium implant materials.成骨细胞和骨组织对表面改性氧化锆和钛种植体材料的反应。
Dent Mater. 2013 Jul;29(7):763-76. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 10.
6
Effect of surface modification of zirconia on cell adhesion, metabolic activity and proliferation of human osteoblasts.氧化锆表面改性对人成骨细胞黏附、代谢活性及增殖的影响。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2017 Feb 1;62(1):75-87. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2015-0139.
7
Relevant aspects in the surface properties in titanium dental implants for the cellular viability.用于细胞活力的牙科钛植入物表面特性的相关方面。
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Jul 1;64:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.049. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
Effects of Different Microstructured Surfaces on the Osseointegration of CAD/CAM Zirconia Dental Implants: An Experimental Study in Rabbits.不同微结构表面对 CAD/CAM 氧化锆牙科种植体骨整合影响的实验研究:兔模型。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Nov/Dec;35(6):1113-1121. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8207.
9
Response of osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia to bone morphogenetic protein-2.在氧化锆上培养的成骨样细胞对骨形态发生蛋白-2的反应。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011 Oct;41(5):227-33. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.5.227. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
10
Characterization of Human Gingival Fibroblasts on Zirconia Surfaces Containing Niobium Oxide.含氧化铌的氧化锆表面上的人牙龈成纤维细胞特性研究
Materials (Basel). 2015 Sep 10;8(9):6018-6028. doi: 10.3390/ma8095288.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Bergenin on Human Gingival Fibroblast Response on Zirconia Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study.岩白菜素对人牙龈成纤维细胞在氧化锆种植体表面反应的影响:一项体外研究。
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Sep 15;14(9):474. doi: 10.3390/jfb14090474.
2
Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Function of Multi-Material Hierarchically Structured Scaffolds.骨组织工程支架:多材料层次结构支架的功能。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2023 Apr;12(9):e2202766. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202766. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
3
Y-TZP Physicochemical Properties Conditioned with ZrO and SiO Nanofilms and Bond Strength to Dual Resin Cement.

本文引用的文献

1
Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies-A systematic review and meta-analysis.氧化锆与钛牙科种植体的临床前研究比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 May;30(5):365-395. doi: 10.1111/clr.13425. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
2
Assessing the osteogenic potential of zirconia and titanium surfaces with an advanced in vitro model.采用先进的体外模型评估氧化锆和钛表面的成骨潜力。
Dent Mater. 2019 Jan;35(1):74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
3
Performance and outcome of zirconia dental implants in clinical studies: A meta-analysis.
用ZrO和SiO纳米薄膜调节的Y-TZP物理化学性质及其与双树脂水门汀的粘结强度
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 9;15(22):7905. doi: 10.3390/ma15227905.
4
How Navigate the Map: The Effect of Surface Topography on the Adhesion of on Biomaterials.如何导航地图:表面形貌对生物材料上细胞黏附的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 18;15(14):4988. doi: 10.3390/ma15144988.
5
A systematic review on neutrophils interactions with titanium and zirconia surfaces: Evidence from in vitro studies.一项关于中性粒细胞与钛和氧化锆表面相互作用的系统评价:来自体外研究的证据。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Aug;8(4):950-958. doi: 10.1002/cre2.582. Epub 2022 May 10.
6
Mechanical Factors Implicated in Zirconia Implant Fracture Placed within the Anterior Region-A Systematic Review.涉及前牙区氧化锆种植体骨折的机械因素——一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Feb 2;10(2):22. doi: 10.3390/dj10020022.
7
Impact of physical decontamination methods on zirconia implant surface and subsequent bacterial adhesion: An in-vitro study.物理去污方法对氧化锆种植体表面及其后续细菌黏附的影响:一项体外研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Feb;8(1):313-321. doi: 10.1002/cre2.486. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
8
Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review.口腔组织相互作用及细胞对氧化锆种植修复组件的反应:一项批判性综述
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 25;14(11):2825. doi: 10.3390/ma14112825.
临床研究中氧化锆牙科种植体的性能和结果:荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:135-153. doi: 10.1111/clr.13352.
4
The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the osteogenic activity in osseointegration: a systematic review.非甾体抗炎药对骨整合中成骨活性的影响:一项系统评价
Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Oct 9;4(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0141-7.
5
Cross-sectional observational study exploring clinical risk of titanium allergy caused by dental implants.横断面观察性研究探讨牙科植入物引起的钛过敏的临床风险。
J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Oct;62(4):426-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
6
Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review.口腔种植体表面特性:综述。
Dent Mater. 2018 Jan;34(1):40-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
7
The Impact of Confluence on Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem (BMMSC) Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation.汇合对骨髓间充质干细胞(BMMSC)增殖和成骨分化的影响。
Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2017 Apr 1;11(2):121-132.
8
Is zirconia a viable alternative to titanium for oral implant? A critical review.氧化锆是否可以作为口腔种植体替代钛?一项批判性综述。
J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Apr;62(2):121-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
ImageJ macros for the user-friendly analysis of soft-agar and wound-healing assays.用于软琼脂和伤口愈合实验用户友好型分析的ImageJ宏程序。
Biotechniques. 2017 Apr 1;62(4):175-179. doi: 10.2144/000114535.
10
Zirconia dental implants: where are we now, and where are we heading?氧化锆牙科种植体:我们现在在哪里,以及我们的发展方向在哪里?
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):241-258. doi: 10.1111/prd.12180.