• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining the effect of underlying individual preferences for present over future on lung cancer screening participation: a cross-sectional analysis of a Korean National Cancer Screening Survey.考察对现在相对于未来的个体偏好的潜在影响对参与肺癌筛查的影响:一项对韩国国家癌症筛查调查的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e035495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035495.
2
Intentions to Undergo Lung Cancer Screening among Korean Men.韩国男性进行肺癌筛查的意向。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6293-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.15.6293.
3
Willingness to participate in combination screening for lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease in four European countries.四个欧洲国家开展肺癌、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和心血管疾病联合筛查的意愿。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul;34(7):4448-4456. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10474-w. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Beliefs and Intentions to Undergo Lung Cancer Screening among Korean Males.韩国男性进行肺癌筛查的信念和意愿。
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Oct;50(4):1096-1105. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.393. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
5
Preferences for More or Less Health Care and Association With Health Literacy of Men Eligible for Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Australia.澳大利亚有资格接受前列腺特异性抗原筛查的男性对更多或更少医疗保健的偏好及其与健康素养的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128380. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28380.
6
Colorectal cancer screening: Associations between information provision, attitudes and intended participation.结直肠癌筛查:信息提供、态度和参与意向之间的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Mar;101(3):546-550. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
7
Adherence to general medical checkup and cancer screening guidelines according to self-reported smoking status: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2010-2012.根据自我报告的吸烟状况遵守一般体检和癌症筛查指南的情况:韩国国家健康和营养检查调查(KNHANES)2010-2012 年。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 22;14(10):e0224224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224224. eCollection 2019.
8
Increasing bowel cancer screening participation: integrating population-wide, primary care and more targeted approaches.提高结直肠癌筛查参与率:整合全人群、初级保健及更具针对性的方法。
Public Health Res Pract. 2019 Jul 31;29(2):2921916. doi: 10.17061/phrp2921916.
9
Defining the information needs of lung cancer screening participants: a qualitative study.定义肺癌筛查参与者的信息需求:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Nov 24;6(1):e000448. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000448. eCollection 2019.
10
Are smokers less likely to seek preventive healthcare measures in Italy?在意大利,吸烟者寻求预防性医疗保健措施的可能性更低吗?
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Sep;27(5):507-513. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000357.

本文引用的文献

1
Present bias and health.当前偏差与健康。
J Risk Uncertain. 2018 Oct;57(2):177-198. doi: 10.1007/s11166-018-9289-z. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
2
Implementing lung cancer screening: baseline results from a community-based 'Lung Health Check' pilot in deprived areas of Manchester.实施肺癌筛查:曼彻斯特贫困地区社区“肺部健康检查”试点的基线结果。
Thorax. 2019 Apr;74(4):405-409. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211377. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
3
Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries.全球癌症生存趋势监测 2000-14 年(CONCORD-3):对来自 71 个国家 322 个基于人群的登记处的 37513025 名诊断患有 18 种癌症之一的患者的个体记录进行分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1023-1075. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
European position statement on lung cancer screening.欧洲肺癌筛查立场声明。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):e754-e766. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30861-6.
5
Corrigendum: Time-discounting and tobacco smoking: a systematic review and network analysis.勘误:时间贴现与吸烟:系统评价和网络分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):869. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx060.
6
Recommendations from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) regarding computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Europe.欧洲胸外科医师协会(ESTS)关于欧洲肺癌计算机断层扫描筛查的建议。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar 1;51(3):411-420. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw418.
7
Promising Approaches From Behavioral Economics to Improve Patient Lung Cancer Screening Decisions.行为经济学用于改善患者肺癌筛查决策的前景方法。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Dec;13(12 Pt B):1566-1570. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.004.
8
Lung cancer screening: latest developments and unanswered questions.肺癌筛查:最新进展与未解问题。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Sep;4(9):749-761. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30200-4.
9
Implementation planning for lung cancer screening: five major challenges.肺癌筛查的实施规划:五大挑战
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Sep;4(9):685-687. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30233-8.
10
Financial Incentives for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial.促进结直肠癌筛查的经济激励措施:一项随机对照有效性试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1630-1636. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.286. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

考察对现在相对于未来的个体偏好的潜在影响对参与肺癌筛查的影响:一项对韩国国家癌症筛查调查的横断面分析。

Examining the effect of underlying individual preferences for present over future on lung cancer screening participation: a cross-sectional analysis of a Korean National Cancer Screening Survey.

机构信息

National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea (the Republic of).

National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea (the Republic of)

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e035495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035495.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035495
PMID:32709642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7380730/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the effect of underlying individual preferences for the present over that for the future on lung cancer screening participation.

SETTING

We analysed the data from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey in 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

4500 adults aged 20-74 years old participated in the study.

DESIGN

In this cross-sectional survey, multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to examine the association between subjects' intention to participate in lung cancer screening and individual preferences. The underlying individual preferences were measured on the basis of the self-reported general willingness to spend money now in order to save money in the future and general preferences with regard to financial planning.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Intention to participate in lung cancer screening.

RESULTS

Individuals eligible for lung cancer screening who place less value on their future were around four times less likely to report an intention to participate in lung cancer screening than were those who valued their future (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.89 to 7.90). A present-biassed individual (one with a tendency for immediate gratification) was also about four times less likely to report an intention to participate in screening than an individual with no present bias (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Underlying individual preferences regarding the present and future significantly affect individuals' intention to participate in lung cancer screening. Hence, provision of incentives may be necessary to encourage the targeted heavy smokers who may have a strong preferences for the present over future.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨个体对现在与未来的偏好对参与肺癌筛查的影响。

设置

我们分析了 2018 年韩国国家癌症筛查调查的数据。

参与者

4500 名 20-74 岁的成年人参与了研究。

设计

在这项横断面调查中,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以检验受试者参与肺癌筛查的意愿与个体偏好之间的关系。个体偏好是基于自我报告的现在花钱意愿和对财务规划的一般偏好来衡量的。

主要结局测量

参与肺癌筛查的意愿。

结果

有资格进行肺癌筛查的个体,如果对未来的重视程度较低,那么报告参与肺癌筛查意愿的可能性比重视未来的个体低约四倍(OR 3.86,95%CI 1.89 至 7.90)。有即时满足倾向(即有现在偏好的个体)报告参与筛查的意愿也比没有现在偏好的个体低约四倍(OR 0.26,95%CI 0.12 至 0.57)。

结论

个体对现在和未来的潜在偏好显著影响个体参与肺癌筛查的意愿。因此,可能需要提供激励措施,以鼓励那些可能强烈偏好现在而非未来的目标性重度吸烟者参与。