Suppr超能文献

院前持续气道正压通气与标准氧疗治疗急性呼吸衰竭的决定性试验是否可行?ACUTE 试验的初步随机对照试验。

Is a definitive trial of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure versus standard oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure indicated? The ACUTE pilot randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e035915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035915.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility of a large-scale definitive multicentre trial of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in acute respiratory failure.

DESIGN

A single-centre, open-label, individual patient randomised, controlled, external pilot trial.

SETTING

A single UK Ambulance Service, between August 2017 and July 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with respiratory distress and peripheral oxygen saturations below British Thoracic Society target levels despite controlled oxygen treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised to prehospital CPAP (O-Two system) versus standard oxygen therapy in a 1:1 ratio using simple randomisation.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Feasibility outcomes comprised recruitment rate, adherence to allocated treatment, retention and data completeness. The primary clinical outcome was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

77 patients were enrolled (target 120), including 7 cases with a diagnosis where CPAP could be ineffective or harmful. CPAP was fully delivered in 74% (target 75%). There were no major protocol violations. Full data were available for all key outcomes (targets ≥90%). Overall 30-day mortality was 27.3%. Of these deceased patients, 14/21 (68%) either did not have a respiratory condition or had ceiling of treatment decisions implemented excluding hospital non-invasive ventilation and critical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Recruitment rate was below target and feasibility was not demonstrated. Limited compliance with CPAP, and difficulty in identifying patients who could benefit from CPAP, indicate that prehospital CPAP is unlikely to materially reduce mortality. A definitive effectiveness trial of CPAP is therefore not recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN12048261; Post-results.

摘要

目的

确定院前持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗急性呼吸衰竭的大规模确定性多中心试验的可行性。

设计

单中心、开放标签、个体患者随机、对照、外部试验。

地点

2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 7 月期间的英国某急救中心。

参与者

呼吸窘迫且外周血氧饱和度低于英国胸科协会目标水平的成年人,尽管接受了控制性氧疗。

干预措施

患者按 1:1 的比例随机分为院前 CPAP(O-Two 系统)组与标准氧疗组,采用简单随机化。

主要和次要结局

可行性结局包括入组率、对分配治疗的依从性、保留率和数据完整性。主要临床结局为 30 天死亡率。

结果

共纳入 77 例患者(目标为 120 例),其中 7 例诊断为 CPAP 无效或有害。CPAP 完全实施率为 74%(目标为 75%)。无重大方案违反。所有关键结局(目标≥90%)均有完整数据。总 30 天死亡率为 27.3%。这些死亡患者中,14/21(68%)要么没有呼吸系统疾病,要么已实施治疗决策的上限,排除了医院无创通气和重症监护。

结论

入组率低于目标,未证明可行性。CPAP 依从性有限,难以确定可从 CPAP 中获益的患者,表明院前 CPAP 不太可能显著降低死亡率。因此,不建议进行 CPAP 的确定性有效性试验。

试验注册

ISRCTN85011043;试验后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc05/7380855/f2073651926a/bmjopen-2019-035915f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验