• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年髋部骨折患者抗凝治疗的结局:维生素K拮抗剂与Xa因子抑制剂的比较。

Outcome of older hip fracture patients on anticoagulation: a comparison of vitamin K-antagonists and Factor Xa inhibitors.

作者信息

Gosch M, Jacobs M, Bail H, Grueninger S, Wicklein S

机构信息

Department for Geriatric Medicine, Paracelsus Private Medical University, General Hospital Nuremberg, Prof. Ernst Nathan Strasse 1, 90419, Nuremberg, Germany.

Department for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University, General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Apr;141(4):637-643. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03547-8. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-020-03547-8
PMID:32710342
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Older hip fracture patients are still challenging in daily clinical practice. Due to the high prevalence of osteoporosis and atrial fibrillation in this age group, the number of fragility fracture patients under oral anticoagulation (OAC) increases. The outcome is still disappointing, short- and long-term mortality and morbidity is high. The impact of pre-existing OAC is not yet clear, especially regarding new OAC drugs like Factor Xa inhibitors (FXa). The purpose of our study was to compare the short-term outcome of older hip fracture patients, without OAC (controls), on Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and on FXa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study is a retrospective case-control study including patients older than 70 years who sustained hip fractures caused by an inadequate trauma and treated at a level 1 trauma center from February 2017 to June 2018. Patient's information was taken from patient's charts. 102 cases were analysed, 61 controls, 41 on OAC (15 on VKA and 26 on FXa). As outcome parameter we defined mortality, perioperative complications, bleeding, need of blood supplements, delay of surgery, length of stay, and a combined outcome parameter (mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, thromboembolic events, blood preservations, re-vision surgery, major bleeding and decline of hemoglobin).

RESULTS

Eight patients died during hospital stay, in-hospital mortality was 7.8%. The highest mortality rate was found in patients on VKA (20%), compared to patients on FXa (3.8%) and controls (6.6%). However, mortality rate did not differ significantly within the groups. The combined endpoint was significantly more frequently seen in patients on OAC compared to controls (p = 0.006). No difference was observed between patients on VKA or FXa. Mean time to surgery and LOS was significantly longer in patients on OAC compared to controls. No significant differences were seen between VKA and FXa.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study OAC was significantly associated with worse outcome compared to controls. Marginal differences were observed between patients on FXa or VKA. Further studies involving a higher number of patients are necessary to confirm our results. At that time, some our results have to interpreted carefully and need confirmation.

摘要

引言

在日常临床实践中,老年髋部骨折患者仍然具有挑战性。由于该年龄组骨质疏松症和心房颤动的高患病率,接受口服抗凝治疗(OAC)的脆性骨折患者数量增加。但其结果仍然令人失望,短期和长期死亡率及发病率都很高。既往OAC的影响尚不清楚,尤其是对于像Xa因子抑制剂(FXa)这样的新型OAC药物。我们研究的目的是比较未接受OAC(对照组)、接受维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)和接受FXa治疗的老年髋部骨折患者的短期结局。

材料与方法

本研究是一项回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了2017年2月至2018年6月在一级创伤中心接受治疗的、年龄大于70岁且因低能量创伤导致髋部骨折的患者。患者信息取自病历。共分析了102例病例,其中61例为对照组,41例接受OAC治疗(15例接受VKA治疗,26例接受FXa治疗)。作为结局参数,我们定义了死亡率、围手术期并发症、出血情况、输血需求、手术延迟、住院时间以及一个综合结局参数(死亡率、心肌梗死、中风、血栓栓塞事件、输血、翻修手术、大出血和血红蛋白下降)。

结果

8例患者在住院期间死亡,住院死亡率为7.8%。VKA治疗组患者的死亡率最高(20%),而FXa治疗组患者的死亡率为3.8%,对照组为6.6%。然而,各组之间的死亡率差异无统计学意义。与对照组相比,OAC治疗组患者更频繁出现综合终点事件(p = 0.006)。VKA治疗组和FXa治疗组患者之间未观察到差异。与对照组相比,OAC治疗组患者的平均手术时间和住院时间显著更长。VKA治疗组和FXa治疗组之间未观察到显著差异。

结论

在我们的研究中,与对照组相比,OAC与更差的结局显著相关。FXa治疗组和VKA治疗组患者之间观察到微小差异。需要开展更多患者参与的进一步研究来证实我们的结果。届时,我们的一些结果必须谨慎解读并需要进一步证实。

相似文献

1
Outcome of older hip fracture patients on anticoagulation: a comparison of vitamin K-antagonists and Factor Xa inhibitors.老年髋部骨折患者抗凝治疗的结局:维生素K拮抗剂与Xa因子抑制剂的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Apr;141(4):637-643. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03547-8. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
Bridging anticoagulation in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists prior to trochanteric and hip fracture surgeries: The current practice.在接受维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗的患者中,在行转子间骨折和髋部骨折手术前进行桥接抗凝治疗:当前的实践。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019 Apr;28(4):469-477. doi: 10.17219/acem/78025.
3
Recanalization therapies in acute ischemic stroke patients: impact of prior treatment with novel oral anticoagulants on bleeding complications and outcome.急性缺血性脑卒中患者的再通治疗:新型口服抗凝剂治疗对出血并发症和结局的影响。
Circulation. 2015 Sep 29;132(13):1261-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015484. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
4
Efficacy and safety of oral factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin-K antagonists in the early phase after acute ischemic stroke or TIA in the real-world setting: The PRODAST study.口服 Xa 因子抑制剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂在急性缺血性卒中和 TIA 后早期真实世界环境中的疗效和安全性:PRODAST 研究。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep;9(3):696-703. doi: 10.1177/23969873241242239. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
Comparison of the short-term risk of bleeding and arterial thromboembolic events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients newly treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonists: a French nationwide propensity-matched cohort study.达比加群或利伐沙班与维生素K拮抗剂新治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者出血和动脉血栓栓塞事件短期风险的比较:一项法国全国性倾向匹配队列研究。
Circulation. 2015 Sep 29;132(13):1252-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015710. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
6
Clinical impact of major bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism treated with factor Xa inhibitors or vitamin K antagonists. An individual patient data meta-analysis.新型口服抗凝药或维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗静脉血栓栓塞症患者大出血的临床影响:一项个体患者数据汇总分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct 5;117(10):1944-1951. doi: 10.1160/TH16-12-0946. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
7
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation on vitamin k antagonists or direct-acting oral anticoagulants: patients profile and long-term follow up outcomes.接受维生素K拮抗剂或直接口服抗凝剂治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者:患者概况及长期随访结果
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2019;89(4):382-392. doi: 10.24875/ACM.19000023.
8
Osteoporotic Fractures in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Conventional Versus Direct Anticoagulants.骨质疏松性骨折在接受常规抗凝剂与直接抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动患者中的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 29;74(17):2150-2158. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1025.
9
Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcome and Preceding Anticoagulation: Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists.急性缺血性脑卒中结局与抗凝治疗前史:直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Apr;29(4):104691. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104691. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
10
Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients on chronic hemodialysis: Contemporary appraisal on the role for patients with atrial fibrillation.慢性血液透析患者中直接口服抗凝剂的应用:对心房颤动患者作用的当代评估。
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct;34(7):446-450. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of hip fracture patients on direct oral anticoagulants: a survey of orthopaedic trauma surgeons, systematic review, and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂治疗髋部骨折患者的管理:骨科创伤外科医生的调查、系统评价和荟萃分析。
OTA Int. 2025 Jan 28;8(1):e360. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000360. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Management and 1-Year Outcome in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture Surgery Receiving Anticoagulation (Warfarin or DOAc) or P2Y12 Antiplatelet Agents.接受抗凝治疗(华法林或直接口服抗凝剂)或P2Y12抗血小板药物的老年髋部骨折手术患者的管理及1年预后
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 25;12(19):6178. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196178.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comorbidity as the dominant predictor of mortality after hip fracture surgeries.合并症是髋部骨折手术后死亡率的主要预测因素。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Dec;30(12):2477-2483. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05139-8. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
2
[Osteoporosis and multimorbidity].[骨质疏松症与多种疾病并存]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Aug;52(5):433-439. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01569-5. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
3
Causes of in-hospital mortality after hip fractures in the elderly.老年人髋部骨折后院内死亡的原因。
Review of perioperative outcomes and management of hip fracture patients on direct oral anticoagulants.
直接口服抗凝剂治疗的髋部骨折患者围手术期结局及管理的综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Jul 3;8(7):561-571. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0060.
4
Synthesis of the evidence on the impact of pre-operative direct oral anticoagulants on patient health outcomes after hip fracture surgery: rapid systematic review.术前直接口服抗凝剂对髋部骨折手术后患者健康结局影响的证据综合:快速系统评价。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2567-2587. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01937-8. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
Hip Int. 2020 Mar;30(2):204-209. doi: 10.1177/1120700019835160. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
4
Association of Oral Anticoagulant Type With Risk of Dementia Among Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.口服抗凝药物类型与非瓣膜性心房颤动患者痴呆风险的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Nov 6;7(21):e009561. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009561.
5
Safety of urgent hip fracture surgery protocol under influence of direct oral anticoagulation medications.直接口服抗凝药物影响下的紧急髋部骨折手术方案的安全性
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.033. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Impact of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Hip Fractures.直接口服抗凝剂对髋部骨折患者的影响。
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan;33(1):e8-e13. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001329.
7
Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre.对于发生髋部骨折且正在服用直接口服抗凝剂的患者,手术是否应延期?英国一家主要创伤中心的一项回顾性病例对照观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 28;8(4):e020625. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020625.
8
Does Use of Oral Anticoagulants at the Time of Admission Affect Outcomes Following Hip Fracture.入院时使用口服抗凝剂是否会影响髋部骨折后的预后。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018 Mar 29;9:2151459318764151. doi: 10.1177/2151459318764151. eCollection 2018.
9
Outcomes of Early Surgical Intervention in Geriatric Proximal Femur Fractures Among Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulation.老年股骨近端骨折患者接受直接口服抗凝药物治疗后早期手术干预的结果。
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jun;32(6):269-273. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001146.
10
The effect anticoagulation status on geriatric fall trauma patients.抗凝状态对老年跌倒创伤患者的影响。
Am J Surg. 2016 Dec;212(6):1237-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Oct 1.