• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲型流感住院患者使用巴洛沙韦与奥司他韦的临床结局比较。

Clinical outcomes of baloxavir versus oseltamivir in patients hospitalized with influenza A.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Hospital, Department of Pharmacy Services, New Haven, CT, USA.

Janssen Scientific Affairs, Raritan, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Oct 1;75(10):3015-3022. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa252.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaa252
PMID:32712669
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To date, clinical trials evaluating baloxavir have excluded patients hospitalized with influenza infection and therefore this study sought to evaluate the efficacy of baloxavir in inpatients with influenza A.

METHODS

This study was a multicentre, retrospective chart review of adult patients admitted to the hospital within the Yale New Haven Health System who received oseltamivir or baloxavir for the treatment of influenza A. Patients were screened for inclusion between January 2018 and April 2018 in the oseltamivir group, while patients in the baloxavir group were screened for inclusion between January 2019 and April 2019. Influenza A diagnosis was confirmed by RT-PCR using a nasopharyngeal swab specimen.

RESULTS

Of the 2392 patients assessed, 790 met the inclusion criteria. There were 359 patients who received baloxavir and 431 patients who received oseltamivir. Patients who received baloxavir were younger compared with those who received oseltamivir [median = 69 (IQR = 57-81) years versus 77 (IQR = 62-86) years; P < 0.001]. Patients who received baloxavir had no significant difference in hospital length of stay [median = 4 (IQR = 3-6) days versus 5 (IQR = 3-6)  days; P = 0.45] or 30 day all-cause mortality [12 (3.3%) versus 26 (6%); P = 0.079] compared with those who received oseltamivir. However, patients who received baloxavir had a significantly faster time to hypoxia resolution [median = 51.7 (IQR = 25.3-89.3) h versus 72 (IQR = 37.5-123) h; P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support the use of baloxavir for the treatment of influenza A in hospitalized patients with the potential benefit of a faster time to resolution of hypoxia.

摘要

目的

迄今为止,评估巴洛沙韦的临床试验排除了因流感感染住院的患者,因此本研究旨在评估巴洛沙韦在甲型流感住院患者中的疗效。

方法

本研究为一项多中心、回顾性病历审查,纳入了 2018 年 1 月至 2018 年 4 月期间在耶鲁纽黑文健康系统住院并接受奥司他韦治疗的流感 A 成年患者,以及 2019 年 1 月至 2019 年 4 月期间接受巴洛沙韦治疗的流感 A 成年患者。使用鼻咽拭子标本通过 RT-PCR 确认流感 A 诊断。

结果

在评估的 2392 名患者中,有 790 名符合纳入标准。其中 359 名患者接受了巴洛沙韦治疗,431 名患者接受了奥司他韦治疗。接受巴洛沙韦治疗的患者比接受奥司他韦治疗的患者年龄更小[中位数=69(IQR=57-81)岁比 77(IQR=62-86)岁;P<0.001]。接受巴洛沙韦治疗的患者与接受奥司他韦治疗的患者相比,住院时间[中位数=4(IQR=3-6)天比 5(IQR=3-6)天;P=0.45]或 30 天全因死亡率[12(3.3%)比 26(6%);P=0.079]无显著差异。然而,接受巴洛沙韦治疗的患者缺氧缓解时间明显更快[中位数=51.7(IQR=25.3-89.3)小时比 72(IQR=37.5-123)小时;P<0.001]。

结论

本研究结果支持将巴洛沙韦用于治疗住院流感 A 患者,其潜在益处是更快地缓解缺氧。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes of baloxavir versus oseltamivir in patients hospitalized with influenza A.甲型流感住院患者使用巴洛沙韦与奥司他韦的临床结局比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Oct 1;75(10):3015-3022. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa252.
2
Clinical outcomes of baloxavir versus oseltamivir in immunocompromised patients.免疫功能低下患者中巴洛沙韦与奥司他韦的临床结局。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2024 Apr;26(2):e14249. doi: 10.1111/tid.14249. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3
Virological and clinical outcomes in outpatients treated with baloxavir or oseltamivir: A Japanese multicenter study in the 2019-2020 influenza season.巴洛沙韦或奥司他韦治疗门诊患者的病毒学和临床结局:2019 - 2020年流感季节日本多中心研究。
Antiviral Res. 2021 Aug;192:105092. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2021.105092. Epub 2021 May 27.
4
Clinical and virological outcomes with baloxavir compared with oseltamivir in pediatric patients aged 6 to < 12 years with influenza: an open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial protocol.儿童患者(6 至<12 岁)流感患者中比奥司他韦相比巴洛沙韦的临床和病毒学结局:一项开放标签、随机、活性对照试验方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 9;21(1):777. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06494-w.
5
Duration of fever and symptoms in children after treatment with baloxavir marboxil and oseltamivir during the 2018-2019 season and detection of variant influenza a viruses with polymerase acidic subunit substitutions.2018-2019 季节使用巴洛沙韦和奥司他韦治疗后儿童的发热和症状持续时间,以及聚合酶酸性亚基替换的变异流感 A 病毒的检测。
Antiviral Res. 2020 Nov;183:104951. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104951. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Clinical effectiveness of baloxavir marboxil against influenza in three seasons.三季中玛巴洛沙韦对流感的临床疗效。
Pediatr Int. 2022 Jan;64(1):e15169. doi: 10.1111/ped.15169.
7
Clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil in the treatment of influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.巴洛沙韦治疗流感的临床疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021 Oct;54(5):865-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
Comparison of Hospitalization Incidence in Influenza Outpatients Treated With Baloxavir Marboxil or Neuraminidase Inhibitors: A Health Insurance Claims Database Study.比较巴洛沙韦与神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗的流感门诊患者的住院发生率:一项医疗保险索赔数据库研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):e1181-e1190. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1870.
9
Baloxavir vs oseltamivir: reduced utilization and costs in influenza.巴洛沙韦与奥司他韦治疗流感:降低药物使用率和治疗成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Mar 1;28(3):e88-e95. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88786.
10
Baloxavir for the treatment of Influenza in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients previously treated with oseltamivir.巴洛沙韦治疗异基因造血干细胞移植受者流感:奥司他韦治疗后的疗效
Transpl Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;22(4):e13336. doi: 10.1111/tid.13336. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir in kidney transplant recipients with influenza.巴洛沙韦酯与奥司他韦在肾移植受者流感治疗中的临床疗效比较
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0295424. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02954-24. Epub 2025 May 22.