• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴洛沙韦酯与奥司他韦在肾移植受者流感治疗中的临床疗效比较

Clinical efficacy of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir in kidney transplant recipients with influenza.

作者信息

Jiang Jiali, Wang Jianping, Hou Wenjing, Hu Bangqin, Chen Pan, Zeng Fang, Zhang Yan, Qian Qing, Ma Kuifen

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0295424. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02954-24. Epub 2025 May 22.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.02954-24
PMID:40401970
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12211070/
Abstract

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for severe influenza and its complications. The effectiveness of baloxavir marboxil (hereafter baloxavir) in infected KTRs is still unknown. In this multicenter retrospective study conducted at eight Grade IIIA hospitals in China, KTRs diagnosed with influenza between October 2023 and March 2024 were enrolled. Of the 246 patients assessed, 117 met the inclusion criteria. There were 59 patients who received baloxavir and 58 patients who received oseltamivir. Patients receiving baloxavir had a longer time from symptom onset to treatment (≤48 h, 59.3% versus 79.3%; = 0.019). Nevertheless, in comparison with those who were administered oseltamivir, they exhibited no statistically significant difference in time to alleviation of influenza symptoms [4 (2-6) versus 5 (3-7); = 0.054], duration of fever [3 (2-4) versus 3 (2-4); = 0.347], or viral clearance [6 (40.0%) versus 10 (58.8%); = 0.479]. However, among patients who received antivirals within 48 h, baloxavir showed a significant correlation with fever resolution when compared with oseltamivir [2 (2, 3) versus 3 (2-4); = 0.030]. Meanwhile, among patients who received antivirals after 48 h, a remarkable improvement of symptom alleviation in 5 days was observed in the baloxavir-treated group as compared to the oseltamivir-treated group [18 (75.0%) versus 2 (16.7%); = 0.001]. In conclusion, compared to oseltamivir, patients may derive benefits from baloxavir treatment within 48 h, but especially after 48 h from symptom onset.IMPORTANCEThe multicenter cohort study is the first to compare the clinical efficacy of baloxavir with oseltamivir in influenza kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The results showed that there were fewer influenza symptoms but a longer time for viral shedding in KTRs compared to non-immunosuppressed patients. No significant difference regarding time to alleviation of influenza symptoms and fever resolution between baloxavir and oseltamivir was found, which is consistent with CAPSTONE-1, whereas influenza KTRs who received baloxavir could have a shorter fever duration and symptom alleviation in 5 days compared to the oseltamivir-treated group. Our findings may provide guidance for influenza therapy in KTRs, solid organ transplant recipients, and immunocompromised patients.

摘要

肾移植受者(KTRs)发生严重流感及其并发症的风险很高。玛巴洛沙韦(以下简称巴洛沙韦)在感染的KTRs中的有效性尚不清楚。在这项在中国八家三级甲等医院进行的多中心回顾性研究中,纳入了2023年10月至2024年3月期间诊断为流感的KTRs。在评估的246例患者中,117例符合纳入标准。其中59例患者接受了巴洛沙韦治疗,58例患者接受了奥司他韦治疗。接受巴洛沙韦治疗的患者从症状出现到治疗的时间更长(≤48小时,59.3%对79.3%;P = 0.019)。然而,与接受奥司他韦治疗的患者相比,他们在流感症状缓解时间[4(2 - 6)天对5(3 - 7)天;P = 0.054]、发热持续时间[3(2 - 4)天对3(2 - 4)天;P = 0.347]或病毒清除方面[6例(40.0%)对10例(58.8%);P = 0.479]没有统计学上显著差异。然而,在48小时内接受抗病毒药物治疗的患者中,与奥司他韦相比,巴洛沙韦与发热消退显著相关[2(2,3)天对3(2 - 4)天;P = 0.030]。同时,在48小时后接受抗病毒药物治疗的患者中,与奥司他韦治疗组相比,巴洛沙韦治疗组在5天内症状缓解有显著改善[18例(75.0%)对2例(16.7%);P = 0.001]。总之,与奥司他韦相比,患者在症状出现后48小时内,尤其是48小时后接受巴洛沙韦治疗可能会受益。重要性多中心队列研究首次比较了巴洛沙韦与奥司他韦在流感肾移植受者(KTRs)中的临床疗效。结果表明,与非免疫抑制患者相比,KTRs的流感症状较少,但病毒 shedding 时间较长。巴洛沙韦和奥司他韦在流感症状缓解时间和发热消退方面没有显著差异,这与CAPSTONE - 1一致,而与奥司他韦治疗组相比,接受巴洛沙韦治疗的流感KTRs发热持续时间可能更短,5天内症状缓解。我们的研究结果可能为KTRs、实体器官移植受者和免疫功能低下患者的流感治疗提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec20/12211070/395de2d1c485/spectrum.02954-24.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec20/12211070/4cc55fc80fc7/spectrum.02954-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec20/12211070/48d9fc6036f6/spectrum.02954-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec20/12211070/ad6f0c033645/spectrum.02954-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec20/12211070/395de2d1c485/spectrum.02954-24.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec20/12211070/4cc55fc80fc7/spectrum.02954-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec20/12211070/48d9fc6036f6/spectrum.02954-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec20/12211070/ad6f0c033645/spectrum.02954-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec20/12211070/395de2d1c485/spectrum.02954-24.f004.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir in kidney transplant recipients with influenza.巴洛沙韦酯与奥司他韦在肾移植受者流感治疗中的临床疗效比较
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0295424. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02954-24. Epub 2025 May 22.
2
Clinical efficacy and Safety of Baloxavir Marboxil compared with Oseltamivir against influenza virus in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.巴洛沙韦酯与奥司他韦治疗儿童流感病毒感染的临床疗效及安全性比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326777. eCollection 2025.
3
[A network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil versus neuraminidase inhibitors for the treatment of influenza in otherwise healthy patients].[巴洛沙韦酯与神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗健康患者流感的疗效和安全性的网络荟萃分析]
Ter Arkh. 2020 Dec 26;92(11):122-131. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2020.11.000870.
4
Comparison of Antiviral Agents for Seasonal Influenza Outcomes in Healthy Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.健康成人和儿童季节性流感治疗中抗病毒药物的比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119151. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19151.
5
Rapid health technology assessment of the novel endonuclease inhibitor baloxavir for the treatment of influenza.新型内切酶抑制剂 baloxavir 治疗流感的快速卫生技术评估。
J Chemother. 2024 Jul;36(4):267-282. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2023.2263270. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Efficacy and safety of onradivir in adults with acute uncomplicated influenza A infection in China: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and oseltamivir-controlled, phase 3 trial.奥纳地韦在中国成人急性非复杂性甲型流感感染中的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照和奥司他韦对照的3期试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Jul;13(7):597-610. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00046-3. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
7
A Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study of Baloxavir Marboxil in Children Less Than 1 Year Old With Suspected or Confirmed Influenza.巴洛沙韦酯在疑似或确诊流感的1岁以下儿童中的3期安全性和有效性研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2025 Apr 28;44(7):645-649. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004826.
8
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children.用于预防和治疗健康成人及儿童流感的神经氨酸酶抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD008965. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008965.pub3.
9
Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy for Seasonal Influenza in Young and Middle-aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.药物治疗在中青年季节性流感中的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Intern Med. 2024 Nov 1;63(21):2913-2922. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2100-23. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
10
Antivirals for post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗流感病毒药物用于暴露后预防:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Aug 24;404(10454):764-772. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01357-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Influenza in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients: Incidence and Outcomes.肝移植和肾移植受者中的流感:发病率和结局
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Mar 28;11(2):e0322622. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03226-22.
2
A Pharmacokinetics-Time to Alleviation of Symptoms Model to Support Extrapolation of Baloxavir Marboxil Clinical Efficacy in Different Ethnic Groups with Influenza A or B.支持以药代动力学-症状缓解时间模型推断流感 A 或 B 病毒不同族群中巴洛沙韦玛巴洛沙韦的临床疗效
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Aug;112(2):372-381. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2648. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
3
Targeted inhibition of the endonuclease activity of influenza polymerase acidic proteins.
靶向抑制流感病毒聚合酶酸性蛋白的核酸内切酶活性
Future Med Chem. 2022 Apr;14(8):571-586. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2021-0264. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
4
Attenuated fusogenicity and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.奥密克戎变异株的融合性和致病性减弱。
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):700-705. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04462-1. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
The Incoming Influenza Season - China, the United Kingdom, and the United States, 2021-2022.2021-2022年中国、英国和美国即将到来的流感季节
China CDC Wkly. 2021 Dec 3;3(49):1039-1045. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.253.
6
Comparing COVID-19 vaccines for their characteristics, efficacy and effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern: a narrative review.比较 COVID-19 疫苗在针对 SARS-CoV-2 及其关注变异株的特性、疗效和有效性方面的差异:一项叙述性综述。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Feb;28(2):202-221. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
7
Infectious disease activity during the COVID-19 epidemic in Japan: Lessons learned from prevention and control measures.日本 COVID-19 疫情期间的传染病活动:防控措施的经验教训。
Biosci Trends. 2021 Sep 22;15(4):257-261. doi: 10.5582/bst.2021.01269. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
8
Impact of COVID-19 outbreaks and interventions on influenza in China and the United States.新冠疫情爆发及防控措施对中美两国流感的影响。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 31;12(1):3249. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23440-1.
9
Epidemiology of laboratory-confirmed influenza among kidney transplant recipients compared to the general population-A nationwide cohort study.与普通人群相比,肾移植受者实验室确诊流感的流行病学:一项全国性队列研究。
Am J Transplant. 2021 May;21(5):1848-1856. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16421. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10
Clinical outcomes of baloxavir versus oseltamivir in patients hospitalized with influenza A.甲型流感住院患者使用巴洛沙韦与奥司他韦的临床结局比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Oct 1;75(10):3015-3022. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa252.