• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性肛裂的治疗选择:随机对照试验的系统评价。

Management options for chronic anal fissure: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Oct;35(10):1807-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03699-4. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-020-03699-4
PMID:32712929
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Anal fissure is the most common cause of severe anorectal pain in adults, contributing significantly to coloproctology workloads. There are a wide variety of management options available, including topical nitrites, calcium channel blockers, botulinum toxin injection and sphincterotomy. The aim of this study was to review current options for the treatment of chronic anal fissure.

METHODS

A comprehensive search identifying randomized controlled trials comparing treatment options for anal fissure published between January 2000 and February 2020 was performed. The primary outcome assessed was healing at 8 weeks post commencing treatment. Secondary outcomes included recurrence, intolerance of treatment and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 2822 studies were identified. After removal of duplicates and non-relevant studies, we identified nine randomized controlled trials which met pre-defined criteria. There was a total of 775 patients. At 8 weeks, healing rates were 95.13% in those treated with sphincterotomy, 66.7% in the botulinum toxin group, 63.8% in the nitrate group, 52.3% for topical diltiazem and 50% for topical minoxidil. Recurrence was highest amongst those treated with botulinum toxin injection (41.7%) and lowest for sphincterotomy (6.9%). Although the absolute number is low, there was a risk of permanent incontinence with sphincterotomy.

CONCLUSION

This review of the randomized control data demonstrates that healing was significantly higher amongst those treated with sphincterotomy versus more conservative modalities. Topical nitrites had similar outcomes to botulinum toxin injection but were poorly tolerated in comparison to other treatments. The benefit of sphincterotomy was at a cost of increased complications, notably permanent incontinence.

摘要

简介

肛裂是成年人严重肛门直肠疼痛的最常见原因,对肛肠病学工作量有重大影响。有多种管理选择,包括局部亚硝酸酯、钙通道阻滞剂、肉毒杆菌毒素注射和括约肌切开术。本研究旨在回顾慢性肛裂的治疗选择。

方法

进行了全面搜索,以确定 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月期间发表的比较肛裂治疗选择的随机对照试验。评估的主要结果是开始治疗后 8 周的愈合。次要结果包括复发、治疗不耐受和并发症。

结果

共确定了 2822 项研究。去除重复项和不相关的研究后,我们确定了符合预先确定标准的九项随机对照试验。共有 775 名患者。在 8 周时,括约肌切开组的愈合率为 95.13%,肉毒毒素组为 66.7%,硝酸盐组为 63.8%,局部地尔硫卓为 52.3%,局部米诺地尔为 50%。肉毒毒素注射组的复发率最高(41.7%),括约肌切开组最低(6.9%)。尽管绝对数字较低,但括约肌切开术存在永久性失禁的风险。

结论

对随机对照数据的回顾表明,与更保守的治疗方式相比,括约肌切开术治疗的愈合率显著更高。局部亚硝酸酯的效果与肉毒毒素注射相似,但与其他治疗方法相比,耐受性较差。括约肌切开术的益处是以增加并发症为代价的,特别是永久性失禁。

相似文献

1
Management options for chronic anal fissure: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.慢性肛裂的治疗选择:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Oct;35(10):1807-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03699-4. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
2
Partial lateral internal sphincterotomy versus combined botulinum toxin A injection and topical diltiazem in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized clinical trial.部分外侧内括约肌切开术与肉毒杆菌毒素A注射联合局部应用地尔硫䓬治疗慢性肛裂的随机临床试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):228-34. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000307.
3
Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: randomized prospective controlled trial.肉毒杆菌毒素注射与外侧内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂:随机前瞻性对照试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Oct;397(7):1093-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0948-2. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
4
Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.肉毒杆菌毒素注射与侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Aug;18(8):693-8. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1121-4. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
5
Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial.肉毒杆菌毒素注射与内括约肌侧切术治疗慢性肛裂的随机对照试验
World J Surg. 2010 Nov;34(11):2730-4. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0736-5.
6
Botulinum toxin injection vs topical nitrates for chronic anal fissure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.肉毒杆菌毒素注射与局部硝酸盐治疗慢性肛裂的比较:一项更新的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jan;20(1):6-15. doi: 10.1111/codi.13969.
7
Fissurectomy Combined with High-Dose Botulinum Toxin Is a Safe and Effective Treatment for Chronic Anal Fissure and a Promising Alternative to Surgical Sphincterotomy.肛裂切除术联合大剂量肉毒杆菌毒素是慢性肛裂的一种安全有效的治疗方法,也是手术括约肌切开术的一种有前景的替代方法。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Oct;58(10):967-73. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000434.
8
Non surgical therapy for anal fissure.肛裂的非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD003431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003431.pub3.
9
Comparison of botulinum toxin injection and lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure.肉毒杆菌毒素注射与内括约肌侧切术治疗慢性肛裂的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Feb;46(2):232-7. doi: 10.1097/01.DCR.0000044712.58674.09.
10
Botulinum toxin injection for chronic anal fissure: a prospective controlled study with long follow-up.肉毒杆菌毒素注射治疗慢性肛裂:一项具有长期随访的前瞻性对照研究。
Minerva Surg. 2024 Jun;79(3):293-302. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10228-6. Epub 2024 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Sphincter Pressure and Anal Length on Surgical Decision in Chronic Anal Fissure.括约肌压力和肛管长度对慢性肛裂手术决策的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 May 29;14(11):3805. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113805.
2
Management of chronic anal fissures: should fissurectomy be performed with botulinum toxin injection?慢性肛裂的治疗:肛裂切除术应与肉毒杆菌毒素注射联合进行吗?
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 May 22;29(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03153-z.
3
Management of gastrointestinal bleed in the intensive care setting, an updated literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Topical Minoxidil Versus Topical Diltiazem for Chemical Sphincterotomy of Chronic Anal Fissure: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial.外用米诺地尔与外用地尔硫䓬治疗慢性肛裂化学性括约肌切开术的前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验
World J Surg. 2018 Jul;42(7):2252-2258. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4449-x.
2
Anal advancement flap versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure- a systematic review and meta-analysis.分析推进皮瓣与侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jan;49:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of anal fissure.
重症监护环境下胃肠道出血的管理:最新文献综述
World J Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 9;14(1):101639. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i1.101639.
4
Retrospective analysis on the efficacy of botulinum toxin alone versus combined botulinum toxin and topical diltiazem.肉毒杆菌毒素单独使用与肉毒杆菌毒素联合局部用硫氮卓酮疗效的回顾性分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Feb 26;40(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04823-y.
5
Anal fissures in COVID-19 survivors: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.新冠病毒病康复者的肛裂:发病率、危险因素及结局
Turk J Surg. 2024 Dec 27;40(4):336-342. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6494. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.肉毒杆菌毒素注射与外侧内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 23;409(1):355. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03484-9.
7
Is chemodenervation with incobotulinumtoxinA an alternative to invasive chronic anal fissure treatments?经皮注射肉毒毒素 A 化学切断术是否可替代侵袭性慢性肛裂治疗方法?
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03428-z.
8
Tailored lateral internal sphincterotomy (T-LIS) for chronic anal fissure by LigaSure Small Jaws©: a comparison with other non-conservative treatments for anal fissures.经 LigaSure Small Jaws©实施的个体化肛门内括约肌切开术(T-LIS)治疗慢性肛裂:与其他非保守性肛裂治疗方法的比较。
Updates Surg. 2024 Oct;76(6):2205-2210. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01943-y. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
9
Anal Fissure and Its Treatments: A Historical Review.肛裂及其治疗:历史回顾
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 4;13(13):3930. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133930.
10
The Assessment of Marcaine Versus Meperidine for Spinal Anesthesia in Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.丁哌卡因与哌替啶用于肛肠手术脊髓麻醉的评估:一项随机临床试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Sep 8;13(5):e136871. doi: 10.5812/aapm-136871. eCollection 2023 Oct.
一种肛门裂治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):605-625. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1664-2. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
4
Anal Fissure.肛裂
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Mar;29(1):30-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570390.
5
Clinical utility and validity of minoxidil response testing in androgenetic alopecia.米诺地尔反应测试在雄激素性脱发中的临床效用和有效性
Dermatol Ther. 2015 Jan-Feb;28(1):13-6. doi: 10.1111/dth.12164. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
6
Health-related quality of life in patients with anal fissure: effect of type D personality.肛裂患者的健康相关生活质量:D型人格的影响。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2014;9(2):93-8. doi: 10.5114/pg.2014.42504. Epub 2014 May 5.
7
The epidemiology and treatment of anal fissures in a population-based cohort.基于人群队列的肛裂流行病学及治疗
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 16;14:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-129.
8
Androgenetic alopecia: an evidence-based treatment update.雄激素性脱发:基于证据的治疗更新。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2014 Jul;15(3):217-30. doi: 10.1007/s40257-014-0077-5.
9
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
10
Self-expanding metal stents in malignant colonic obstruction: experiences from Sweden.自膨式金属支架治疗恶性结肠梗阻:瑞典的经验
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Jul 30;4:274. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-274.