Sahan Ismail, Anagnostakos Konstantinos
Zentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1791-1808. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03560-x. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
Although metallosis is a well-known complication after total hip arthroplasty, little is known about this phenomenon after total (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aim of the present work was to review the current knowledge about the reasons and the diagnostic as well as therapeutic management of metallosis after knee arthroplasty.
A literature search was performed through PubMed until April 2019. Search terms were "metallosis" in combination with "knee", "knee prosthesis", "knee arthroplasty" and "knee replacement", respectively. All publications were analyzed regarding publication year, level of evidence, number of knees/patients treated, type of prosthesis, metallosis cause, time period between primary implantation and metallosis emergence, laboratory examination, treatment, complications and follow up.
A total of 38 studies reporting on a total of 97 knees were identified. 29 studies reported on metallosis after TKA, 8 after UKA, and one study after both procedures. The time period between the primary implantation and metallosis emergence ranged between 6 weeks and 26 years. The most common reason was the failure of a metal-backed patellar component in 40%, followed by implant/structural- and PE failure (wear/dislocation) in 27% and 18% of the cases, respectively. Complete blood cell count, serum chemistry, erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein serum values were not indicative to diagnose metallosis. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological analyses and macroscopic evaluation during surgery. Depending on the particular cause various surgical procedures have been performed. Complete prosthesis exchange was the most common one showing no complications in 89.4% of the cases.
Metallosis after knee arthroplasty is a rare and perhaps underestimated or under published complication. A systematic diagnostic approach is necessary for the timely and correct diagnosis. A thorough debridement as well as a (sub)total synovectomy should be always performed. In cases with a damaged component, a partial/complete prosthesis exchange leads to the best results. Should a malalignment be the cause of the metallosis, then it should be corrected within the revision surgery.
虽然金属沉着症是全髋关节置换术后一种广为人知的并发症,但对于全膝关节置换术(TKA)或单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)后的这种现象却知之甚少。本研究的目的是回顾目前关于膝关节置换术后金属沉着症的原因、诊断以及治疗管理的相关知识。
通过PubMed进行文献检索,截至2019年4月。检索词分别为“金属沉着症”与“膝关节”、“膝关节假体”、“膝关节置换术”和“膝关节置换”的组合。对所有出版物进行分析,内容包括发表年份、证据水平、治疗的膝关节/患者数量、假体类型、金属沉着症原因、初次植入与金属沉着症出现之间的时间段、实验室检查、治疗、并发症及随访情况。
共确定了38项研究,报道了总共97例膝关节病例。29项研究报道了TKA术后的金属沉着症,8项报道了UKA术后的情况,1项研究报道了两种手术术后的情况。初次植入与金属沉着症出现之间的时间段为6周至26年。最常见的原因是金属背衬髌骨部件失效,占40%,其次是植入物/结构和聚乙烯失效(磨损/脱位),分别占病例的27%和18%。全血细胞计数、血清化学、红细胞沉降率或C反应蛋白血清值对诊断金属沉着症并无指示性意义。诊断通过组织病理学分析和手术中的宏观评估得以证实。根据具体原因进行了各种手术操作。全假体置换是最常见的手术方式,89.4%的病例未出现并发症。
膝关节置换术后的金属沉着症是一种罕见的并发症,可能未得到充分重视或报道不足。系统的诊断方法对于及时、正确的诊断是必要的。应始终进行彻底的清创以及(次)全滑膜切除术。对于部件受损的病例,部分/全假体置换能取得最佳效果。如果金属沉着症是由排列不齐引起的,那么应在翻修手术中予以纠正。