• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association between specialist compensation and Accountable Care Organization performance.专科医生薪酬与责任医疗组织绩效的关联。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55(5):722-728. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13323. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Association Between Specialist Office Visits and Health Expenditures in Accountable Care Organizations.在责任医疗组织中,专家门诊就诊与医疗支出的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6796.
3
Association of Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations vs traditional Medicare fee for service with spending, utilization, and patient experience.先驱责任医疗组织与传统 Medicare 按服务收费制在支出、利用和患者体验方面的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 2;313(21):2152-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4930.
4
Performance in the Medicare Shared Savings Program by Accountable Care Organizations Disproportionately Serving Dual and Disabled Populations.由负责医疗保健的组织提供服务的双重和残疾人群不成比例的医疗保险共享储蓄计划的绩效。
Med Care. 2018 Sep;56(9):805-811. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000968.
5
Benchmarking Implications: Analysis of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Spending Level and Quality of Care.标杆管理的启示:医疗保险责任医疗组织支出水平与医疗质量分析
J Healthc Qual. 2018 Nov/Dec;40(6):344-353. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000123.
6
Medicare Spending after 3 Years of the Medicare Shared Savings Program.医疗保险共享储蓄计划实施 3 年后的医疗保险支出。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1139-1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1803388. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
7
Accountable care organization initiatives to improve the cost and outcomes of specialty care.责任医疗组织计划改善专科医疗的成本和结果。
Am J Manag Care. 2024 May;30(5):237-240. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89536.
8
Spending variation among ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program.ACO 间在联邦医疗保险储蓄计划中的支出差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Apr;26(4):170-175. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42834.
9
Changes in specialty care use and leakage in Medicare accountable care organizations.医疗保险责任制照顾组织中专科医疗服务使用的变化和渗漏。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 May 1;24(5):e141-e149.
10
Accountable Care Organizations Serving Deprived Communities Are Less Likely to Share in Savings.为贫困社区服务的责任医疗组织分享节约资金的可能性较小。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;32(6):913-922. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.06.190004.

引用本文的文献

1
"The dream is that there's one place you go": a qualitative study of women's experiences seeking care from Long COVID clinics in the USA.“梦想是有一个你能去的地方”:对美国女性在长新冠诊所寻求治疗经历的定性研究
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 13;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03465-1.
2
The Effect of Network-Level Payment Models on Care Network Performance: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Literature.网络层面支付模式对医疗网络绩效的影响:实证文献的范围综述
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Apr 1;22(2):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6002. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiologist Participation in Accountable Care Organizations and Changes in Spending and Quality for Medicare Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.心脏病专家参与负责医疗组织以及医疗保险心血管疾病患者的支出和质量变化
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Sep;12(9):e005438. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005438. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
2
Association Between Specialist Office Visits and Health Expenditures in Accountable Care Organizations.在责任医疗组织中,专家门诊就诊与医疗支出的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6796.
3
Professionalism, Performance, and the Future of Physician Incentives.专业精神、绩效与医生激励机制的未来
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2419-2420. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17719.
4
Engagement of Accountable Care Organizations in Acute Care Redesign: Results of a National Survey.责任医疗组织参与急性护理重新设计:一项全国性调查的结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1601-1603. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4525-4.
5
Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Are Not Associated With Reductions in the Use of Low-Value Coronary Revascularization.医疗保险责任医疗组织与低价值冠状动脉血运重建术使用的减少无关。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004492. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004492.
6
Changes in specialty care use and leakage in Medicare accountable care organizations.医疗保险责任制照顾组织中专科医疗服务使用的变化和渗漏。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 May 1;24(5):e141-e149.
7
Distribution of Visits for Chronic Conditions Between Primary Care and Specialist Providers in Medicare Shared Savings Accountable Care Organizations.医疗保险储蓄账户下的责任医疗组织中,初级保健和专科医生之间用于慢性病就诊的分布情况。
Med Care. 2018 May;56(5):424-429. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000903.
8
Accountable Care at the Frontlines of a Health System: Bridging Aspiration and Reality.卫生系统前线的责任医疗:弥合期望与现实
JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):655-656. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18995.
9
Explaining Sluggish Savings under Accountable Care.解释 accountable care 下储蓄增长缓慢的原因
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1809-1811. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1709197.
10
A Scalable Program for Customized Patient Education Videos.一个用于定制患者教育视频的可扩展程序。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Nov;43(11):606-610. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

专科医生薪酬与责任医疗组织绩效的关联。

Association between specialist compensation and Accountable Care Organization performance.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55(5):722-728. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13323. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13323
PMID:32715464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7518824/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) using cost reduction measures in specialist compensation demonstrated better performance.

DATA SOURCES

National, cross-sectional survey data on ACOs (2013-2015) linked to public-use data on ACO performance (2014-2016).

STUDY DESIGN

We compared characteristics of ACOs that did and did not report use of cost reduction measures in specialist compensation and determined the association between using this approach and ACO savings, outpatient spending, and specialist visit rates.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Of 160 ACOs surveyed, 26 percent reported using cost reduction measures to help determine specialist compensation. ACOs using cost reduction in specialist compensation were more often physician-led (68.3 vs 49.6 percent) and served higher-risk patients (mean Hierarchical Condition Category score 1.09 vs 1.05). These ACOs had similar savings per beneficiary year (adjusted difference $82.6 [95% CI -77.9, 243.1]), outpatient spending per beneficiary year (-24.0 [95% CI -248.9, 200.8]), and specialist visits per 1000 beneficiary years (369.7 [95% CI -9.3, 748.7]).

CONCLUSION

Incentivizing specialists on cost reduction was not associated with ACO savings in the short term. Further work is needed to determine the most effective approach to engage specialists in ACO efforts.

摘要

目的

确定医疗保险共享储蓄计划责任医疗组织(ACO)在专家薪酬中使用降低成本措施是否表现更好。

数据来源

与 ACO 绩效的公共使用数据(2014-2016 年)相关联的全国性、横截面调查数据(2013-2015 年)。

研究设计

我们比较了报告和未报告在专家薪酬中使用降低成本措施的 ACO 的特征,并确定了采用这种方法与 ACO 储蓄、门诊支出和专家就诊率之间的关联。

主要发现

在接受调查的 160 个 ACO 中,26%报告使用降低成本措施来帮助确定专家薪酬。在专家薪酬中使用成本降低措施的 ACO 更可能由医生领导(68.3%比 49.6%),并为高风险患者提供服务(平均层次条件类别评分 1.09 比 1.05)。这些 ACO 的每个受益年度的储蓄额相似(调整后的差异为 82.6 美元[95%CI-77.9,243.1]),每个受益年度的门诊支出(-24.0 美元[95%CI-248.9,200.8])和每 1000 个受益年度的专家就诊次数(369.7 美元[95%CI-9.3,748.7])。

结论

短期内,激励专家降低成本与 ACO 储蓄无关。需要进一步努力确定吸引专家参与 ACO 工作的最有效方法。