• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌筛查和治疗:我们从何而来,又将走向何方?

Prostate cancer screening and treatment: where have we come from and where are we going?

机构信息

Department of Surgery (Urology), UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2020 Aug;126(2):218-224. doi: 10.1111/bju.15153. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1111/bju.15153
PMID:32715604
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current prostate cancer screening and treatment paradigm in light of recently published long-term results of major screening and treatment trials.

METHODS

Historical review of the evolution of the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer followed by a detailed summary of the findings and differences among the three major screening trials and the three major treatment trials.

RESULTS

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing can identify clinically significant prostate cancer and has produced a significant stage shift and is the likely explanation for the decline in prostate cancer mortality. Unfortunately, PSA testing predominantly identifies low-grade disease that is unlikely to progress during a patient's lifetime leading to substantial diagnosis of indolent disease. Treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP) appears to benefit primarily younger men (aged <65 years) with intermediate-grade disease. Too few men with low-grade disease benefit from RP to justify intervening in all. Unfortunately, high-grade prostate cancer often progresses despite surgery and radiation.

CONCLUSION

The primary PSA testing paradigm is wrong. Rather than attempting to identify all prostate cancers as early as possible, testing objectives should shift towards identifying men likely to harbour clinically significant disease. These are the men who appear to benefit from early diagnosis and intervention, including the earlier use of antiandrogen therapy prior to widespread metastases.

摘要

目的

根据最近发表的主要筛查和治疗试验的长期结果,评估当前的前列腺癌筛查和治疗模式。

方法

对前列腺癌诊断和治疗演变的历史回顾,随后详细总结了三项主要筛查试验和三项主要治疗试验的发现和差异。

结果

前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测可以识别有临床意义的前列腺癌,并已产生显著的分期转变,这可能是前列腺癌死亡率下降的原因。不幸的是,PSA 检测主要识别低级别疾病,这些疾病在患者的一生中不太可能进展,导致大量的惰性疾病被诊断出来。根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗似乎主要对年龄<65 岁的中级别疾病的年轻男性有益。接受 RP 治疗的低级别疾病患者获益太少,无法证明对所有患者进行干预是合理的。不幸的是,即使进行了手术和放疗,高级别前列腺癌仍常常进展。

结论

主要的 PSA 检测模式是错误的。检测目标不应试图尽早识别所有前列腺癌,而应转向识别可能患有有临床意义疾病的男性。这些男性似乎受益于早期诊断和干预,包括在广泛转移之前更早地使用抗雄激素治疗。

相似文献

1
Prostate cancer screening and treatment: where have we come from and where are we going?前列腺癌筛查和治疗:我们从何而来,又将走向何方?
BJU Int. 2020 Aug;126(2):218-224. doi: 10.1111/bju.15153. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Structured Population-based Prostate-specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2019.基于人群的前列腺特异性抗原筛查前列腺癌:欧洲泌尿外科学会 2019 年立场声明。
Eur Urol. 2019 Aug;76(2):142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.033. Epub 2019 May 12.
3
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.
4
Screening for prostate cancer with PSA testing: current status and future directions.用 PSA 检测进行前列腺癌筛查:现状与未来方向。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2011 May;25(6):452-60, 463.
5
6
Association Between Lead Time and Prostate Cancer Grade: Evidence of Grade Progression from Long-term Follow-up of Large Population-based Cohorts Not Subject to Prostate-specific Antigen Screening.铅时间与前列腺癌分级之间的关联:来自未接受前列腺特异性抗原筛查的大型人群队列长期随访的分级进展证据。
Eur Urol. 2018 Jun;73(6):961-967. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
7
Clinical predictors of upgrading to Gleason grade 4 or 5 disease at radical prostatectomy: potential implications for patient selection for radiation and androgen suppression therapy.根治性前列腺切除术中升级为Gleason 4或5级疾病的临床预测因素:对放疗和雄激素抑制治疗患者选择的潜在影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Nov 1;45(4):841-6. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00260-6.
8
Use of low free to total PSA ratio in prostate cancer screening: detection rates, clinical and pathological findings in Brazilian men with serum PSA levels <4.0 ng/mL.在前列腺癌筛查中使用低游离 PSA 与总 PSA 比值:血清 PSA 水平<4.0ng/mL 的巴西男性中的检出率、临床和病理发现。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E653-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11398.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
9
The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原持续存在对预测淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者临床进展和癌症特异性死亡率的作用。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
10
[Clinical value of prostate specific antigen screening in early detection of prostate cancer].前列腺特异性抗原筛查在前列腺癌早期检测中的临床价值
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Sep;31(9):705-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between high‑density lipoproteins and prostate specific antigen: A cross‑sectional study from NHANES database.高密度脂蛋白与前列腺特异性抗原之间的关联:一项来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据库的横断面研究。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb 18;22(4):34. doi: 10.3892/mco.2025.2829. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Portrait of WWP1: the current state in human cancer.WWP1简介:人类癌症的现状
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025 Jan 30;12:1516613. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1516613. eCollection 2024.
3
Predictive diagnostic value of mean platelet volume to platelet count and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios in the gray zone of prostate cancer with tPSA between 4 to 10 ng/mL.
总前列腺特异抗原(tPSA)在4至10 ng/mL之间的前列腺癌灰色区域中,平均血小板体积与血小板计数及中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的预测诊断价值。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 14;14:1454124. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1454124. eCollection 2024.
4
Advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with biomarkers for the diagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像结合生物标志物在高级别前列腺癌诊断中的进展。
Front Surg. 2024 Jul 16;11:1429831. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1429831. eCollection 2024.
5
Associations between genetically predicted concentrations of plasma proteins and the risk of prostate cancer.遗传预测的血浆蛋白浓度与前列腺癌风险之间的关联。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 27;24(1):905. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12659-y.
6
Exploring the therapeutic mechanism of curcumin in prostate cancer using network pharmacology and molecular docking.运用网络药理学和分子对接技术探索姜黄素在前列腺癌中的治疗机制
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 19;10(12):e33103. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33103. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
7
A panel based on three-miRNAs as diagnostic biomarker for prostate cancer.基于三种微小RNA的前列腺癌诊断生物标志物组合。
Front Genet. 2024 May 16;15:1371441. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1371441. eCollection 2024.
8
Systematic Review on the Cost Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Screening in Europe.系统评价欧洲前列腺癌筛查的成本效益。
Eur Urol. 2024 Nov;86(5):400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.036. Epub 2024 May 23.
9
A novel model incorporating quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound into PI-RADSv2-based nomogram detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.一种新型模型,将定量对比增强超声纳入基于 PI-RADSv2 的列线图,用于检测临床上有意义的前列腺癌。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 15;14(1):11083. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61866-x.
10
Assessment of Tumor Markers in Renal Transplant Recipients.肾移植受者肿瘤标志物的评估
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024 May 3;4(3):270-275. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10319. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.