Suppr超能文献

轻度创伤性脑损伤的治疗效果:随机对照试验的系统评价。

Treatment outcomes in mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Brain & Spinal Cord Injury Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran.

Psychosomatic Medicine Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2020 Jul 28;34(9):1139-1149. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1797168. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a controversial and under-researched area, despite most traumatic brain injuries being classed as mild. Our objective was to review the evidence underpinning these approaches to treat mTBI including educational, psychological, rehabilitative and pharmacological approaches and discuss their efficacy.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was carried out using Web of science, Scopus, Medline, Pubmed, Cinahl, and PsychInfo databases. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) looking at treatment outcome in mTBI for adults were included, published between 1980 and 2019. Methodological quality of the studies was reviewed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) checklist for RCTs.

RESULTS

Searches identified 3993 studies, of which 25 met inclusion criteria, and a total number of participants of 3213. Mean age was 35, and 59% male. Ten studies had <100 participants, 15 studies 100-395. Studies were grouped into education and early intervention, rehabilitation (8), psychological interventions (4), and pharmacotherapy (4). Inconsistency of definitions and outcome measures used precluded meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional education and reassurance can no longer be recommended as having the best evidence base for efficacy as compared to psychological and rehabilitative approaches, and guidelines should begin to reflect this.

摘要

目的

轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)是一个有争议且研究不足的领域,尽管大多数创伤性脑损伤都属于轻度。我们的目的是回顾这些治疗 mTBI 的方法的证据,包括教育、心理、康复和药理学方法,并讨论它们的疗效。

方法

使用 Web of science、Scopus、Medline、Pubmed、Cinahl 和 PsychInfo 数据库对文献进行系统综述。纳入了 1980 年至 2019 年间发表的针对成人 mTBI 的治疗结果的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用苏格兰校际指南网络(SIGN)RCT 检查表评估研究的方法学质量。

结果

搜索共确定了 3993 项研究,其中 25 项符合纳入标准,共有 3213 名参与者。平均年龄为 35 岁,男性占 59%。10 项研究的参与者人数<100,15 项研究的参与者人数为 100-395。研究分为教育和早期干预、康复(8 项)、心理干预(4 项)和药物治疗(4 项)。由于使用的定义和结果测量不一致,无法进行荟萃分析。

结论

与心理和康复方法相比,传统的教育和安慰不能再被推荐为最有效的证据基础,指南应该开始反映这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验