Suppr超能文献

使用差异项目和测试功能分析评估丹麦和荷兰四维度症状问卷的测量等效性。

Assessing measurement equivalence of the Danish and Dutch Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire using differential item and test functioning analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health - CORE, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2021 Jun;49(4):479-486. doi: 10.1177/1403494820942074. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

Abstract

The Dutch Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) measures distress, depression, anxiety and somatisation, facilitating the distinction between stress-related problems and psychiatric disorder in primary and occupational health care. The aim of the study was to examine the measurement equivalence across the Danish and Dutch 4DSQ. Danish 4DSQ data were obtained from a cohort of Danish citizens on sick leave for mental-health problems. Dutch 4DSQ data were obtained from a cohort of Dutch employees on sick leave and a cohort of general practice attenders suspected of having mental-health problems. The study samples were matched on age and sex. The 4DSQ scales were assessed for essential unidimensionality using confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement equivalence of the 4DSQ across the groups was assessed using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis. The study groups each consisted of 1363 people (63% female, =42 years). The 4DSQ scales proved essentially unidimensional. DIF was detected in 20 items. In terms of Cohen's effect size, DIF was mostly small or moderate. In terms of effect size, the mean effect on the scale score (DTF) was negligible. Nevertheless, it is recommended to adjust some of the cut-off points for two Danish 4DSQ scales to retain the meaning of these cut-off points in Dutch respondents.

摘要

荷兰四维度症状问卷(4DSQ)可测量苦恼、抑郁、焦虑和躯体化,有助于在初级和职业保健中区分与压力相关的问题和精神障碍。本研究旨在检验丹麦和荷兰 4DSQ 的测量等效性。丹麦 4DSQ 数据来自因心理健康问题请病假的丹麦公民队列,荷兰 4DSQ 数据来自因心理健康问题请病假的荷兰员工队列和疑似有心理健康问题的一般实践就诊者队列。研究样本按年龄和性别进行匹配。使用验证性因素分析评估 4DSQ 量表的基本单维性。使用差异项目和测试功能(DIF 和 DTF)分析评估 4DSQ 在组间的测量等效性。研究组各包含 1363 人(女性占 63%,年龄=42 岁)。4DSQ 量表被证明具有基本的单维性。20 个项目存在 DIF。根据 Cohen 的效应大小,DIF 大多为小或中等。从量表评分的平均效应(DTF)来看,效应可以忽略不计。然而,建议调整两个丹麦 4DSQ 量表的一些截断点,以保留这些截断点在荷兰应答者中的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6397/8135249/8ed715308b3e/10.1177_1403494820942074-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验