• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用差异项目和测试功能分析评估丹麦和荷兰四维度症状问卷的测量等效性。

Assessing measurement equivalence of the Danish and Dutch Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire using differential item and test functioning analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health - CORE, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2021 Jun;49(4):479-486. doi: 10.1177/1403494820942074. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1177/1403494820942074
PMID:32715935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8135249/
Abstract

The Dutch Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) measures distress, depression, anxiety and somatisation, facilitating the distinction between stress-related problems and psychiatric disorder in primary and occupational health care. The aim of the study was to examine the measurement equivalence across the Danish and Dutch 4DSQ. Danish 4DSQ data were obtained from a cohort of Danish citizens on sick leave for mental-health problems. Dutch 4DSQ data were obtained from a cohort of Dutch employees on sick leave and a cohort of general practice attenders suspected of having mental-health problems. The study samples were matched on age and sex. The 4DSQ scales were assessed for essential unidimensionality using confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement equivalence of the 4DSQ across the groups was assessed using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis. The study groups each consisted of 1363 people (63% female, =42 years). The 4DSQ scales proved essentially unidimensional. DIF was detected in 20 items. In terms of Cohen's effect size, DIF was mostly small or moderate. In terms of effect size, the mean effect on the scale score (DTF) was negligible. Nevertheless, it is recommended to adjust some of the cut-off points for two Danish 4DSQ scales to retain the meaning of these cut-off points in Dutch respondents.

摘要

荷兰四维度症状问卷(4DSQ)可测量苦恼、抑郁、焦虑和躯体化,有助于在初级和职业保健中区分与压力相关的问题和精神障碍。本研究旨在检验丹麦和荷兰 4DSQ 的测量等效性。丹麦 4DSQ 数据来自因心理健康问题请病假的丹麦公民队列,荷兰 4DSQ 数据来自因心理健康问题请病假的荷兰员工队列和疑似有心理健康问题的一般实践就诊者队列。研究样本按年龄和性别进行匹配。使用验证性因素分析评估 4DSQ 量表的基本单维性。使用差异项目和测试功能(DIF 和 DTF)分析评估 4DSQ 在组间的测量等效性。研究组各包含 1363 人(女性占 63%,年龄=42 岁)。4DSQ 量表被证明具有基本的单维性。20 个项目存在 DIF。根据 Cohen 的效应大小,DIF 大多为小或中等。从量表评分的平均效应(DTF)来看,效应可以忽略不计。然而,建议调整两个丹麦 4DSQ 量表的一些截断点,以保留这些截断点在荷兰应答者中的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6397/8135249/f1f4b054533d/10.1177_1403494820942074-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6397/8135249/8ed715308b3e/10.1177_1403494820942074-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6397/8135249/f1f4b054533d/10.1177_1403494820942074-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6397/8135249/8ed715308b3e/10.1177_1403494820942074-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6397/8135249/f1f4b054533d/10.1177_1403494820942074-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing measurement equivalence of the Danish and Dutch Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire using differential item and test functioning analysis.使用差异项目和测试功能分析评估丹麦和荷兰四维度症状问卷的测量等效性。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Jun;49(4):479-486. doi: 10.1177/1403494820942074. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Assessing the equivalence of Web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis: a case of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ).使用基于网络的和纸质问卷的等效性评估,采用不同项目和测试功能(DIF 和 DTF)分析:以四维度症状问卷(4DSQ)为例。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1191-1200. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1816-5. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Cross-cultural validation of the Turkish Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis.运用差异项目和测验功能(DIF和DTF)分析对土耳其四维症状问卷(4DSQ)进行跨文化验证。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 May 11;17:53. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0449-4.
4
The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey.一般人群中的四维症状问卷(4DSQ):量表结构、信度、测量不变性及常模数据:一项横断面调查
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 15;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0533-4.
5
The English version of the four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ) measures the same as the original Dutch questionnaire: a validation study.四维症状问卷(4DSQ)的英文版本与原始荷兰语问卷测量结果相同:一项验证研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;20(4):320-6. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2014.905826. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
6
Evaluating the validity of the French version of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire with differential item functioning analysis.通过差异项目功能分析评估法语版四维症状问卷的效度。
Fam Pract. 2015 Aug;32(4):474-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv025. Epub 2015 May 7.
7
Validation of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in a mental health setting.在心理健康环境中验证四维度症状问卷(4DSQ)。
Psychol Health Med. 2021 Jan-Dec;26(sup1):1-19. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1883685. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
8
Measuring maternal mental health using the Dutch Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): Pregnancy-related item bias across the perinatal period.使用荷兰四维症状问卷(4DSQ)测量孕产妇心理健康:围产期与妊娠相关的项目偏差
Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
9
The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization.四维症状问卷(4DSQ):一份用于评估痛苦、抑郁、焦虑和躯体化的多维自陈问卷的效度研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 Aug 22;6:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-34.
10
Cross-cultural validation of the German version of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in multimorbid elderly people.多系统疾病老年人群中四维度症状问卷(4DSQ)德语版的跨文化验证。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Oct;27(10):2691-2697. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1924-2. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Danish Ibbis Trials for Sickness Absentees with Common Mental Disorders: A Phase 4 Prospective Study Comparing Randomized Trial and Real-World Data.针对患有常见精神障碍的病假员工的丹麦伊比试验:一项比较随机试验和真实世界数据的4期前瞻性研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jul 26;24(3):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7562. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-cultural validation of the German version of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in multimorbid elderly people.多系统疾病老年人群中四维度症状问卷(4DSQ)德语版的跨文化验证。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Oct;27(10):2691-2697. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1924-2. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
2
Integrated mental health care and vocational rehabilitation to improve return to work rates for people on sick leave because of depression and anxiety (the Danish IBBIS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.综合精神卫生保健与职业康复以提高因抑郁和焦虑而休病假者的复工率(丹麦IBBIS试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 2;18(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2272-1.
3
Integrated mental health care and vocational rehabilitation to improve return to work rates for people on sick leave because of exhaustion disorder, adjustment disorder, and distress (the Danish IBBIS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
综合精神卫生保健与职业康复以提高因精疲力竭症、适应障碍和精神困扰而休病假者的复工率(丹麦IBBIS试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 2;18(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2273-0.
4
Identifying levels of general distress in first line mental health services: can GP- and eHealth clients' scores be meaningfully compared?识别一线心理健康服务中的一般困扰程度:全科医生和电子健康客户的评分是否具有可比性?
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;17(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1552-3.
5
The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey.一般人群中的四维症状问卷(4DSQ):量表结构、信度、测量不变性及常模数据:一项横断面调查
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 15;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0533-4.
6
Cross-cultural validation of the Turkish Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis.运用差异项目和测验功能(DIF和DTF)分析对土耳其四维症状问卷(4DSQ)进行跨文化验证。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 May 11;17:53. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0449-4.
7
The association between medically unexplained physical symptoms and health care use over two years and the influence of depressive and anxiety disorders and personality traits: a longitudinal study.医学上无法解释的身体症状与两年内医疗保健利用之间的关联以及抑郁和焦虑障碍及人格特质的影响:一项纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 22;16:100. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1332-7.
8
Investigation and Treatment of Missing Item Scores in Test and Questionnaire Data.测试与问卷数据中缺失项分数的调查与处理
Multivariate Behav Res. 2003 Oct 1;38(4):505-28. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_4.
9
Evaluating the validity of the French version of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire with differential item functioning analysis.通过差异项目功能分析评估法语版四维症状问卷的效度。
Fam Pract. 2015 Aug;32(4):474-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv025. Epub 2015 May 7.
10
Validation of the 4DSQ somatization subscale in the occupational health care setting as a screener.4DSQ躯体化分量表在职业卫生保健环境中作为筛查工具的效度验证。
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Mar;25(1):105-15. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9529-2.