• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺沃迪亚克细菌基因+多重聚合酶链反应检测法的性能评估

Performance Evaluation of the Novodiag Bacterial GE+ Multiplex PCR Assay.

作者信息

Roy Charly, Robert David, Bénéjat Lucie, Buissonnière Alice, Ducournau Astrid, Mégraud Francis, Bessède Emilie, Boraud Delphine, Lehours Philippe

机构信息

University Hospital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.

EXALAB, Labexa Group, Le Haillan, France.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Sep 22;58(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01033-20.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.01033-20
PMID:32719031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7512166/
Abstract

The bacteriological diagnosis of intestinal bacterial infections has historically been based on culture on agar plates. However, culture may lack sensitivity, and some enteropathogens, such as pathovars of , may escape routine diagnosis. Our goal was to evaluate the analytical performance of the Novodiag Bacterial GE+ kit for the detection of enteropathogenic bacteria in acute community diarrhea. We included 251 stools in this study (198 retrospective and 53 prospective). The analytical performance was calculated using a composite reference standard (CRS) in the absence of a perfect gold standard (lack of sensitivity of culture). The CRS was defined as positive if culture was positive or, in case of a negative culture, if the BD Max extended enteric bacterial panel and/or other real-time PCR (RT-PCR) tests were positive. Of the 251 samples, 200 were positive, and 51 were negative. Overall sensitivities of the Novodiag Bacterial GE+ kit for sp., sp., sp./enteroinvasive (EIEC), , enterohemorrhagic (EHEC), and enterotoxigenic (ETEC) ranged from 98.98 to 100%, specificities ranged from 98.08 to 100%, positive predictive values (PPVs) ranged from 88.24 to 100%, and negative predictive values (NVPs) ranged from 99.36 to 100%. The analytical performance of the Novodiag Bacterial GE+ kit is excellent. It can be used as a routine tool in the rapid diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis. Despite the eNAT tube dilution of the primary sample, the detection of sp. and EHEC was perfect. The kit has the advantage of only detecting pathogenic Its performance for is very satisfactory.

摘要

肠道细菌感染的细菌学诊断历来基于琼脂平板培养。然而,培养可能缺乏敏感性,一些肠道病原体,如某些菌的致病型,可能会逃过常规诊断。我们的目标是评估Novodiag细菌基因+检测试剂盒在急性社区腹泻中检测肠道致病菌的分析性能。本研究纳入了251份粪便样本(198份回顾性样本和53份前瞻性样本)。在缺乏完美金标准(培养缺乏敏感性)的情况下,使用综合参考标准(CRS)计算分析性能。如果培养结果为阳性,或者在培养结果为阴性的情况下,如果BD Max扩展肠道细菌检测板和/或其他实时PCR(RT-PCR)检测结果为阳性,则CRS定义为阳性。在251份样本中,200份为阳性,51份为阴性。Novodiag细菌基因+检测试剂盒对某些菌属、某些菌属、某些菌属/肠侵袭性大肠杆菌(EIEC)、、肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)和产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)的总体敏感性范围为98.98%至100%,特异性范围为98.08%至100%,阳性预测值(PPV)范围为88.24%至100%,阴性预测值(NPV)范围为99.36%至100%。Novodiag细菌基因+检测试剂盒的分析性能非常出色。它可作为细菌性胃肠炎快速诊断的常规工具。尽管对原始样本进行了eNAT管稀释,但对某些菌属和EHEC的检测效果完美。该试剂盒的优点是只检测致病的,其对的检测性能非常令人满意。

相似文献

1
Performance Evaluation of the Novodiag Bacterial GE+ Multiplex PCR Assay.诺沃迪亚克细菌基因+多重聚合酶链反应检测法的性能评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Sep 22;58(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01033-20.
2
A quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of 9 pathogens directly from stools of travelers with diarrhea.一种定量聚合酶链反应检测方法,可直接从腹泻旅行者的粪便中快速检测 9 种病原体。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;11(10):1300-1307.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.037. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
3
Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Major Bacterial Enteric Pathogens in Fecal Specimens: Intestinal Inflammation and Bacterial Load Are Correlated in Campylobacter Infections.用于检测粪便标本中主要肠道细菌病原体的多重实时PCR检测方法的评估:弯曲杆菌感染中肠道炎症与细菌载量相关。
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Sep;54(9):2262-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00558-16. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
4
Multisite Evaluation of the BD Max Extended Enteric Bacterial Panel for Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Vibrio, and Plesiomonas shigelloides from Stool Specimens.BD Max 扩展肠菌检测试剂盒检测粪便标本中肠炎耶尔森菌、肠毒性大肠杆菌、弧菌和类志贺邻单胞菌的多中心评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Nov;55(11):3258-3266. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00911-17. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
5
Real-time multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella, Shigella and Yersinia species in fecal samples.实时多重 PCR 检测粪便样本中的空肠弯曲菌、沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌和耶尔森氏菌
Int J Med Microbiol. 2011 Nov;301(7):577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
6
Evaluation of a multiplex real-time PCR kit Amplidiag® Bacterial GE in the detection of bacterial pathogens from stool samples.多重实时荧光定量PCR试剂盒Amplidiag® Bacterial GE用于检测粪便样本中细菌病原体的评估。
J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Sep;128:61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
Simultaneous Molecular Detection of Common Bacterial Enteropathogens in Children with Diarrhea by Multiplex-PCR Assay.多重 PCR 检测法同时检测腹泻患儿常见细菌性肠道病原体。
Clin Lab. 2021 Jun 1;67(6). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.201046.
8
Evaluation of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the BD Max™ Enteric Bacterial Panel for molecular detection of pathogens for acute gastroenteritis in the Singaporean population.评估 BD Max™ 肠道细菌检测 panel 在新加坡人群中对急性肠胃炎病原体进行分子检测的临床灵敏度和特异性。
J Microbiol Methods. 2022 Jun;197:106478. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2022.106478. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
9
Evaluation of a real-time multiplex PCR for the simultaneous detection of Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp./EIEC, and Yersinia enterocolitica in fecal samples.用于同时检测粪便样本中弯曲杆菌、沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌/肠侵袭性大肠杆菌及小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌的实时多重聚合酶链反应的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;34(3):535-42. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2257-x. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
10
Verification of analytical bacterial spectrum of QIAstat-Dx® GI V2 and Novodiag® Bacterial GE+ V2-0 diagnostic panels.验证 QIAstat-Dx® GI V2 和 Novodiag® Bacterial GE+ V2-0 诊断试剂盒的分析细菌谱。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Sep 23;76(Suppl 3):iii50-iii57. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab242.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance evaluation of the Biosynex AMPLIQUICK Fecal Bacteriology PCR kit.百欧森 AMPLIQUICK 粪便细菌学 PCR 试剂盒性能评估
BMC Microbiol. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04118-w.
2
Clinical performance evaluation of TAQPATH Enteric Bacterial Select Panel for the detection of common enteric bacterial pathogens in comparison to routine stool culture and other qPCR-based diagnostic tests.TAQPATH 肠道细菌选择检测 panel 用于检测常见肠道细菌病原体的临床性能评估,与常规粪便培养和其他基于 qPCR 的诊断检测相比。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jan 11;12(1):e0317223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03172-23. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
3
Prevalence of Diarrhoeagenic among Children Aged between 0-36 Months in Peri-Urban Areas of Lusaka.卢萨卡城郊地区0至36个月儿童腹泻病的患病率
Microorganisms. 2023 Nov 17;11(11):2790. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112790.
4
Genomic Diversity of Campylobacter lari Group Isolates from Europe and Australia in a One Health Context.从“One Health”角度分析欧洲和澳大利亚的弯曲杆菌组分离株的基因组多样性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022 Dec 13;88(23):e0136822. doi: 10.1128/aem.01368-22. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of multiplex nucleic acid amplification tests for infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多重核酸扩增检测技术用于 感染的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pathog Glob Health. 2023 May;117(3):259-272. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2022.2097830. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Interpret a Positive PCR Result Using the BD MAX System in the Absence of Positive Culture?在无阳性培养结果的情况下,如何使用BD MAX系统解读聚合酶链反应(PCR)阳性结果?
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 3;8(12):2138. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122138.
2
Evaluation of a multiplex gastrointestinal PCR panel for the aetiological diagnosis of infectious diarrhoea.评价一种多重胃肠道 PCR 检测面板用于感染性腹泻病因诊断的效果。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2020 Feb;52(2):114-120. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1688861. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Clinical interpretation of enteric molecular diagnostic tests.肠道分子诊断检测的临床解读
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Dec;25(12):1454-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.08.018. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
Multicenter evaluation of the new QIAstat Gastrointestinal Panel for the rapid syndromic testing of acute gastroenteritis.多中心评估新型 QIAstat 胃肠道Panel 用于急性胃肠炎的快速综合征检测。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;38(11):2103-2112. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03646-4. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
5
Clinical Yield of a Molecular Diagnostic Panel for Enteric Pathogens in Adult Outpatients With Diarrhea and Validation of Guidelines-Based Criteria for Testing.用于腹泻成年门诊患者肠道病原体的分子诊断检测板的临床检出率及基于指南的检测标准的验证
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 16;6(4):ofz162. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz162. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Seegene Allplex Gastrointestinal, Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel, and BD MAX Enteric Assays for Detection of Gastrointestinal Pathogens in Clinical Stool Specimens.Seegene Allplex 胃肠道、Luminex xTAG 胃肠道病原体检测试剂盒和 BD MAX 肠道检测试剂盒用于临床粪便标本中胃肠道病原体检测的比较评估。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Aug;143(8):999-1005. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0002-OA. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Impact of Gastrointestinal Panel Implementation on Health Care Utilization and Outcomes.胃肠道panel 实施对医疗保健利用和结果的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Feb 27;57(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01775-18. Print 2019 Mar.
8
Clinical Impact of a Multiplex Gastrointestinal Polymerase Chain Reaction Panel in Patients With Acute Gastroenteritis.急性胃肠炎患者应用多重胃肠道聚合酶链反应-panel 的临床影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 13;67(11):1688-1696. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy357.
9
Statistical adjustment of culture-independent diagnostic tests for trend analysis in the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), USA.统计调整食品传播疾病主动监测网络(FoodNet)中用于趋势分析的非培养诊断检测方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;47(5):1613-1622. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy041.
10
Low Yield of FilmArray GI Panel in Hospitalized Patients with Diarrhea: an Opportunity for Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention.住院腹泻患者中 FilmArray GI Panel 的低检出率:诊断管理干预的机会。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01558-17. Print 2018 Mar.