Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
International Max Planck Research School NeuroCom, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2020 Aug 19;40(34):6572-6583. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0241-20.2020. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
Brain responses vary considerably from moment to moment, even to identical sensory stimuli. This has been attributed to changes in instantaneous neuronal states determining the system's excitability. Yet the spatiotemporal organization of these dynamics remains poorly understood. Here we test whether variability in stimulus-evoked activity can be interpreted within the framework of criticality, which postulates dynamics of neural systems to be tuned toward the phase transition between stability and instability as is reflected in scale-free fluctuations in spontaneous neural activity. Using a novel noninvasive approach in 33 male human participants, we tracked instantaneous cortical excitability by inferring the magnitude of excitatory postsynaptic currents from the N20 component of the somatosensory evoked potential. Fluctuations of cortical excitability demonstrated long-range temporal dependencies decaying according to a power law across trials, a hallmark of systems at critical states. As these dynamics covaried with changes in prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band (8-13 Hz), we establish a mechanistic link between ongoing and evoked activity through cortical excitability and argue that the co-emergence of common temporal power laws may indeed originate from neural networks poised close to a critical state. In contrast, no signatures of criticality were found in subcortical or peripheral nerve activity. Thus, criticality may represent a parsimonious organizing principle of variability in stimulus-related brain processes on a cortical level, possibly reflecting a delicate equilibrium between robustness and flexibility of neural responses to external stimuli. Variability of neural responses in primary sensory areas is puzzling, as it is detrimental to the exact mapping between stimulus features and neural activity. However, such variability can be beneficial for information processing in neural networks if it is of a specific nature, namely, if dynamics are poised at a so-called critical state characterized by a scale-free spatiotemporal structure. Here, we demonstrate the existence of a link between signatures of criticality in ongoing and evoked activity through cortical excitability, which fills the long-standing gap between two major directions of research on neural variability: the impact of instantaneous brain states on stimulus processing on the one hand and the scale-free organization of spatiotemporal network dynamics of spontaneous activity on the other.
大脑的反应在瞬间变化很大,即使是对相同的感觉刺激也是如此。这归因于瞬间神经元状态的变化决定了系统的兴奋性。然而,这些动力学的时空组织仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们测试了刺激诱发活动的可变性是否可以用临界性来解释,临界性假设神经网络的动力学是针对稳定性和不稳定性之间的相变进行调整的,这反映在自发神经活动的无标度波动中。我们使用一种新的非侵入性方法,在 33 名男性人类参与者中,通过从体感诱发电位的 N20 成分推断兴奋性突触后电流的大小,跟踪瞬时皮质兴奋性。皮质兴奋性的波动显示出长程时间依赖性,在试验之间根据幂律衰减,这是处于临界状态的系统的标志。由于这些动力学与刺激前 alpha 带(8-13 Hz)的振荡活动的变化有关,我们通过皮质兴奋性建立了持续和诱发活动之间的机制联系,并认为共同出现的共同时间幂律可能确实源于接近临界状态的神经网络。相比之下,在皮质下或周围神经活动中没有发现临界性的迹象。因此,临界性可能代表皮质水平上与刺激相关的大脑过程变异性的一个简约组织原则,可能反映了神经对外界刺激的反应的稳健性和灵活性之间的微妙平衡。初级感觉区的神经反应的变异性令人困惑,因为它不利于刺激特征与神经活动之间的精确映射。然而,如果这种变异性具有特定的性质,即如果动力学处于所谓的临界状态,其具有无标度的时空结构,那么它可能对神经网络中的信息处理有益。在这里,我们通过皮质兴奋性证明了持续和诱发活动中的临界性特征之间存在联系,这填补了神经变异性两个主要研究方向之间的长期差距:一方面是瞬时大脑状态对刺激处理的影响,另一方面是自发活动的时空网络动力学的无标度组织。