Stephani T, Nierula B, Villringer A, Eippert F, Nikulin V V
Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; International Max Planck Research School NeuroCom, Leipzig, Germany.
Max Planck Research Group Pain Perception, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2022 Dec 1;264:119687. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119687. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
Identical sensory stimuli can lead to different neural responses depending on the instantaneous brain state. Specifically, neural excitability in sensory areas may shape the brain´s response already from earliest cortical processing onwards. However, whether these dynamics affect a given sensory domain as a whole or occur on a spatially local level is largely unknown. We studied this in the somatosensory domain of 38 human participants with EEG, presenting stimuli to the median and tibial nerves alternatingly, and testing the co-variation of initial cortical responses in hand and foot areas, as well as their relation to pre-stimulus oscillatory states. We found that amplitude fluctuations of initial cortical responses to hand and foot stimulation - the N20 and P40 components of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP), respectively - were not related, indicating local excitability changes in primary sensory regions. In addition, effects of pre-stimulus alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (18-23 Hz) band amplitude on hand-related responses showed a robust somatotopic organization, thus further strengthening the notion of local excitability fluctuations. However, for foot-related responses, the spatial specificity of pre-stimulus effects was less consistent across frequency bands, with beta appearing to be more foot-specific than alpha. Connectivity analyses in source space suggested this to be due to a somatosensory alpha rhythm that is primarily driven by activity in hand regions while beta frequencies may operate in a more hand-region-independent manner. Altogether, our findings suggest spatially distinct excitability dynamics within the primary somatosensory cortex, yet with the caveat that frequency-specific processes in one sub-region may not readily generalize to other sub-regions.
相同的感觉刺激可能会根据大脑的瞬时状态导致不同的神经反应。具体而言,感觉区域的神经兴奋性可能从最早的皮层处理阶段就开始塑造大脑的反应。然而,这些动态变化是影响整个给定的感觉领域,还是在空间局部水平上发生,在很大程度上尚不清楚。我们用脑电图研究了38名人类参与者的体感领域,交替向正中神经和胫神经施加刺激,并测试手部和足部区域初始皮层反应的协变,以及它们与刺激前振荡状态的关系。我们发现,对手部和足部刺激的初始皮层反应的幅度波动——分别是体感诱发电位(SEP)的N20和P40成分——并不相关,这表明初级感觉区域存在局部兴奋性变化。此外,刺激前α(8 - 13Hz)和β(18 - 23Hz)频段幅度对与手部相关反应的影响显示出强烈的躯体定位组织,从而进一步强化了局部兴奋性波动的概念。然而,对于与足部相关的反应,刺激前效应的空间特异性在不同频段上不太一致,β频段似乎比α频段更具足部特异性。源空间中的连通性分析表明,这是由于体感α节律主要由手部区域的活动驱动,而β频率可能以一种与手部区域更不相关的方式运作。总之,我们的研究结果表明初级体感皮层内存在空间上不同的兴奋性动态变化,但需要注意的是,一个子区域中特定频率的过程可能不容易推广到其他子区域。