• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Manuscript Writing and Publication Workshop: An Invoking Pilot Study on Enhancing Cognitive Research Capabilities in Health Sciences Institutes of Pakistan.医学论文写作与发表工作坊:一项关于提升巴基斯坦健康科学机构认知研究能力的启发性初步研究
Cureus. 2020 Jun 24;12(6):e8802. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8802.
2
Usefulness of a workshop on scientific writing and publication in improving the baseline knowledge deficit among postgraduates.科学写作和出版研讨会在提高研究生基础知识缺陷方面的有用性。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2020 Sep;50(3):316-321. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2020.323.
3
Peer-taught virtual research workshops for surgical residents: Protocol for a novel and sustainable solution to improving surgical research in Pakistan.同行教学式虚拟研究研讨会在外科住院医师中的应用:一项新颖且可持续的解决方案,旨在改善巴基斯坦的外科研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Jan;71(Suppl 1)(1):S130-S135.
4
Writing for publication: a workshop to prepare faculty as medical writers.撰写论文以供发表:一场帮助教员成为医学撰写者的研讨会。
Fam Med. 1996 Oct;28(9):650-4.
5
Training in reference management software--a part of new medical informatics workshops in Pakistan.参考文献管理软件培训——巴基斯坦新医学信息学工作坊的一部分。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2007 Apr-Jun;19(2):70-1.
6
Implementation and Outcomes of a Faculty-Based, Peer Review Manuscript Writing Workshop.基于教师的同行评审稿件写作工作坊的实施与成果
J Prof Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):262-70. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
An analysis of interactive hands-on workshops on medical writing.医学写作互动实践工作坊分析
J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Jan;61(1):66-70.
8
Impact of a remotely delivered, writing for publication program on publication outcomes of novice researchers.远程授课的科研论文发表写作课程对新手研究人员论文发表成果的影响。
Rural Remote Health. 2018 May;18(2):4468. doi: 10.22605/RRH4468. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Evaluating the impact of faculty development programme initiative: Are we really improving skills in MCQ writing?评估教师发展计划倡议的影响:我们真的在提高 MCQ 写作技能吗?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):2434-2438. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1207.
10
A One-Day Dental Faculty Workshop in Writing Multiple-Choice Questions: An Impact Evaluation.一场关于编写选择题的为期一天的牙科学院研讨会:影响评估。
J Dent Educ. 2015 Nov;79(11):1305-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness and knowledge of manuscript writing and research integrity: A cross sectional survey among graduate students.研究生对手稿撰写和研究诚信的认识与了解:一项横断面调查
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 5;8(11):e11447. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11447. eCollection 2022 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to Scientific Writing Among Applied Epidemiologists.应用流行病学家在科学写作方面的障碍与促进因素
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 May/Jun;23(3):291-294. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000433.
2
Barriers to Practical Learning in the Field: A Qualitative Study of Iranian Nursing Students' Experiences.实地实践学习的障碍:对伊朗护理专业学生经历的定性研究
Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2016 May 21;5(2):e26920. doi: 10.17795/nmsjournal26920. eCollection 2016 Jun.
3
Writing for publication: institutional support provides an enabling environment.撰写论文以供发表:机构支持提供了有利环境。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 18;16:115. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0642-0.
4
Research engagement of health sciences librarians: a survey of research-related activities and attitudes.健康科学图书馆员的研究参与度:一项关于研究相关活动和态度的调查
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Apr;104(2):166-73. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.015.
5
Information retrieval, critical appraisal and knowledge of evidence-based dentistry among Finnish dental students.芬兰牙科学生的信息检索、批判性评价及循证牙科知识
Eur J Dent Educ. 2017 Nov;21(4):214-219. doi: 10.1111/eje.12203. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
Understanding and practice of evidence based search strategy among postgraduate dental students: a preliminary study.研究生牙科学员对循证检索策略的理解和实践:一项初步研究。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2015 Jun;15(2):44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
7
Journal Club presentation in research orientation at Bahria University Medical & Dental College.在巴哈里亚大学医学院和牙科学院面向研究方向的期刊俱乐部报告。
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jan-Feb;31(1):136-9. doi: 10.12669/pjms.311.6314.
8
Getting published: reflections of a collaborative writing group.发表文章:一个合作写作小组的思考
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jan;34(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.019. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
9
Physicians reading and writing practices: a cross-sectional study from Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.医生的读写实践:来自巴基斯坦卡拉奇民事医院的横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 27;12:76. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-76.
10
An analysis of interactive hands-on workshops on medical writing.医学写作互动实践工作坊分析
J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Jan;61(1):66-70.

医学论文写作与发表工作坊:一项关于提升巴基斯坦健康科学机构认知研究能力的启发性初步研究

Manuscript Writing and Publication Workshop: An Invoking Pilot Study on Enhancing Cognitive Research Capabilities in Health Sciences Institutes of Pakistan.

作者信息

Hussain Mehwish, Rehman Rehana, Baig Mukhtiar

机构信息

Biostatistics, Imam Abdurrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.

Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Jun 24;12(6):e8802. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8802.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.8802
PMID:32724748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7381853/
Abstract

Background With an upsurge in research in developing countries, researchers from allied sciences need to augment their skills for disseminating research work worldwide. Training workshop is one of the quick interventions which can enhance writing skills and ease research publication. Objective We designed this research to explore the perception of the faculty of different higher education institutes (HEIs) regarding manuscript writing and to assess the impact of these workshops in the improvement of cognitive capabilities of preliminary researchers in Pakistan. Methodology We conducted workshops in HEIs of Sindh, Pakistan. Contents of the workshop covered algorithm of writing manuscript and related descriptions, choice of quality journals, correspondence with the editor, and dealing with rejection. The knowledge of the participants was assessed by 15 items pre and post evaluation tests. McNamar's test assessed the significance of the change in knowledge. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to check the difference in the opinion of workshop quality among different institutes. Results A significant improvement was observed in participants' knowledge on the readers' prospects (P=0.001), the algorithm of writing (P<0.001), interpretations of results (P<0.001), and selection quality journal for publication (P <0.001). The agreement with the workshop's quality based on need, knowledge, and content was above average. Conclusion The participants' response regarding the effectiveness of manuscript writing for publication workshop was overwhelmingly positive, and there was a significant impact on the knowledge of the participants. There is a need for research training that will help for better capacity building in different HEIs of Pakistan.

摘要

背景 随着发展中国家研究热潮的兴起,相关学科的研究人员需要提升其在全球范围内传播研究成果的技能。培训工作坊是能够提高写作技能并促进研究成果发表的快速干预措施之一。目的 我们开展此项研究,以探究不同高等教育机构(HEIs)的教师对手稿撰写的看法,并评估这些工作坊对提高巴基斯坦初研人员认知能力的影响。方法 我们在巴基斯坦信德省的高等教育机构举办了工作坊。工作坊内容涵盖手稿撰写的流程及相关说明、优质期刊的选择、与编辑的通信以及应对退稿。通过15项前后评估测试来评估参与者的知识水平。McNamar检验评估知识变化的显著性。进行Kruskal Wallis检验以检查不同机构对工作坊质量看法的差异。结果 参与者在读者期望(P = 0.001)、写作流程(P < 0.001)、结果解读(P < 0.001)以及选择优质期刊发表(P < 0.001)等方面的知识有显著提高。基于需求、知识和内容对工作坊质量的认可度高于平均水平。结论 参与者对手稿发表写作工作坊有效性的反馈总体积极,且对参与者的知识有显著影响。巴基斯坦不同高等教育机构需要开展有助于更好地进行能力建设的研究培训。