• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估教师发展计划倡议的影响:我们真的在提高 MCQ 写作技能吗?

Evaluating the impact of faculty development programme initiative: Are we really improving skills in MCQ writing?

机构信息

Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):2434-2438. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1207.

DOI:10.47391/JPMA.1207
PMID:34974586
Abstract

A series of seven workshops were conducted in 2018, at the National University of Medical Sciences and its affiliated institutes, to evaluate the effectiveness of a three-hour workshop in improving faculty competence in developing high quality test items. Participants' satisfaction was evaluated with a post-workshop feedback questionnaire. A self-made structured questionnaire was required to be filled as a pre-test and post-test assessment. Paired t-test was applied and difference in mean scores of responses was evaluated. A total of 141 faculty members were trained. The training session led to high satisfaction in all elements of workshop, significant improvements in boosting confidence in item writing skills (p=0.001), recognising parts of MCQs (p=0.001), identifying item writing flaws (p=0.001), and levels of Millers pyramid and blooms taxonomy (p=0.001). Training sessions of short duration are effective in improving faculty competence in writing high quality test items, if hands-on experience is built-in and effective feedback is provided.

摘要

2018 年,在国立医科大学及其附属医院举办了一系列七次研讨会,以评估三小时研讨会在提高教师开发高质量测试题能力方面的效果。通过研讨会后的反馈问卷评估参与者的满意度。作为预测试和后测试评估,需要填写一份自制的结构化问卷。应用配对 t 检验评估平均得分的差异。共有 141 名教师接受了培训。培训课程在研讨会的所有元素中都得到了高度的满意度,在提高对编写项目技能的信心方面有显著的提高(p=0.001),认识到多项选择题的部分(p=0.001),识别项目编写缺陷(p=0.001),以及米勒金字塔和布鲁姆分类法的水平(p=0.001)。如果包含实践经验并提供有效的反馈,短期培训课程可以有效地提高教师编写高质量测试题的能力。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the impact of faculty development programme initiative: Are we really improving skills in MCQ writing?评估教师发展计划倡议的影响:我们真的在提高 MCQ 写作技能吗?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):2434-2438. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1207.
2
Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.短期培训课程能否提高牙科学院教师编写选择题的质量?一项试点研究。
J Dent Educ. 2017 Aug;81(8):948-955. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.047.
3
A One-Day Dental Faculty Workshop in Writing Multiple-Choice Questions: An Impact Evaluation.一场关于编写选择题的为期一天的牙科学院研讨会:影响评估。
J Dent Educ. 2015 Nov;79(11):1305-13.
4
Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)北部边境大学(NBU)教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)在编写高质量多项选择题方面的成效。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62607. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.纵向教师发展计划对多项选择题编写技能的有效性:一项随访研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185895. eCollection 2017.
6
Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.教师培训对多项选择题质量的影响。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):210-214. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_30_20. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
7
Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions' item writing flaws.海湾合作委员会国家牙科教师对多选题项目编写缺陷的认识。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1812224. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1812224.
8
The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.教师发展在提高牙医学教育多项选择题质量中的作用。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):316-322. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.189.
9
Faculty development on item writing substantially improves item quality.开展教师项目写作工作能显著提高试题质量。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Aug;17(3):369-76. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9315-2. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
10
Faculty perceptions on one-best MCQ development.教师对最佳单项选择题开发的看法。
Clin Teach. 2023 Feb;20(1):e13529. doi: 10.1111/tct.13529. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a long term faculty development program on improvement in quality of MCQs: an impact evaluation study.长期教师发展计划对改进多项选择题质量的影响:一项影响评估研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07081-2.
2
Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)北部边境大学(NBU)教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)在编写高质量多项选择题方面的成效。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62607. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Exploring the experiences of content experts with item vetting during item bank development.
探索内容专家在题库开发过程中进行题目审核的经验。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jul;40(6):1241-1246. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.6.8664.
4
The Effect of a One-Day Workshop on the Quality of Framing Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology in a Medical College in India.一日研讨会对印度一所医学院生理学多项选择题编制质量的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 24;15(8):e44049. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44049. eCollection 2023 Aug.