Suppr超能文献

分析四种测量侧卧位下三维骨盆倾斜度的方法。

Analysis of four methods of measuring three-dimensional pelvic tilt in the lateral decubitus position.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020 Oct;58(10):2387-2396. doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02235-4. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

Abstract

Proper alignment of acetabular implantation is necessary for good patient outcomes and preventing complications or additional surgeries in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Rotation of the pelvis in lateral decubitus (LD) is typically not accounted for as surgeons use the surgery table as a reference plane to align implants. This study compared four techniques to measure 3D pelvic rotations in LD position using computer models. CT scans of 19 subjects in LD position were used to create 3D pelvis models. Pelvic rotations were measured by three users using four techniques: landmark (LM), defined plane (DP), anterior pelvic plane (APP), and plane of best symmetry (POBS) methods. Measurements were analysed for intra-user reliability and relationships between methods were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and coefficient of determination. The POBS method exhibited the highest inter-observer reliability and is recommended as a new measurement technique to measure pelvic rotations before THA surgery. The LM method exhibited low reliability but may be suitable for expert users familiar with pelvic landmarks. The APP method should only be used when the patients' APP planes are known in neutral standing and side-lying postures. The DP method is not recommended due to substantial individual variability. Graphical abstract.

摘要

髋臼植入物的正确定位对于全髋关节置换术(THA)患者的良好预后和预防并发症或额外手术是必要的。在侧卧位(LD)中,骨盆的旋转通常未被考虑在内,因为外科医生将手术台用作参考平面来对准植入物。本研究比较了四种技术,使用计算机模型来测量 LD 位置的 3D 骨盆旋转。使用 19 名处于 LD 位置的受试者的 CT 扫描来创建 3D 骨盆模型。三位用户使用四种技术测量骨盆旋转:标志点(LM)、定义平面(DP)、前骨盆平面(APP)和最佳对称平面(POBS)方法。测量结果分析了内部观察者的可靠性,并使用组内相关系数、测量标准误差和决定系数评估了方法之间的关系。POBS 方法表现出最高的观察者间可靠性,建议作为 THA 手术前测量骨盆旋转的新测量技术。LM 方法的可靠性较低,但可能适用于熟悉骨盆标志的专家用户。当患者在中立站立和侧卧位的 APP 平面已知时,应仅使用 APP 方法。DP 方法由于个体差异较大,不建议使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验