Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Oct 1;41(14):3839-3854. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25089. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
Neurofeedback training has been shown to influence behavior in healthy participants as well as to alleviate clinical symptoms in neurological, psychosomatic, and psychiatric patient populations. However, many real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies report large inter-individual differences in learning success. The factors that cause this vast variability between participants remain unknown and their identification could enhance treatment success. Thus, here we employed a meta-analytic approach including data from 24 different neurofeedback studies with a total of 401 participants, including 140 patients, to determine whether levels of activity in target brain regions during pretraining functional localizer or no-feedback runs (i.e., self-regulation in the absence of neurofeedback) could predict neurofeedback learning success. We observed a slightly positive correlation between pretraining activity levels during a functional localizer run and neurofeedback learning success, but we were not able to identify common brain-based success predictors across our diverse cohort of studies. Therefore, advances need to be made in finding robust models and measures of general neurofeedback learning, and in increasing the current study database to allow for investigating further factors that might influence neurofeedback learning.
神经反馈训练已被证明可以影响健康参与者的行为,并减轻神经、身心和精神科患者群体的临床症状。然而,许多实时 fMRI 神经反馈研究报告了学习成功方面的个体间存在较大差异。导致参与者之间存在这种巨大差异的因素尚不清楚,而确定这些因素可能会提高治疗效果。因此,在这里我们采用了一种元分析方法,该方法包含了来自 24 项不同神经反馈研究的数据,共有 401 名参与者,其中包括 140 名患者,以确定在预训练功能定位器或无反馈运行期间(即,在没有神经反馈的情况下进行自我调节)目标脑区的活动水平是否可以预测神经反馈学习的成功。我们观察到,在功能定位器运行期间的预训练活动水平与神经反馈学习的成功之间存在略微正相关,但我们无法确定跨我们多样化研究队列的常见基于大脑的成功预测因素。因此,需要在寻找一般神经反馈学习的稳健模型和措施方面取得进展,并增加当前研究数据库,以进一步研究可能影响神经反馈学习的因素。