Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France.
INSERM UMR 1141, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Nov;41(16):4610-4629. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25145. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
Inconsistencies across studies investigating subcortical correlates of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may stem from small sample size, sample heterogeneity, and omitting or linearly adjusting for total brain volume (TBV). To properly adjust for TBV, brain allometry-the nonlinear scaling relationship between regional volumes and TBV-was considered when examining subcortical volumetric differences between typically developing (TD) and ASD individuals. Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange I (ABIDE I; N = 654) data was analyzed with two methodological approaches: univariate linear mixed effects models and multivariate multiple group confirmatory factor analyses. Analyses were conducted on the entire sample and in subsamples based on age, sex, and full scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ). A similar ABIDE I study was replicated and the impact of different TBV adjustments on neuroanatomical group differences was investigated. No robust subcortical allometric or volumetric group differences were observed in the entire sample across methods. Exploratory analyses suggested that allometric scaling and volume group differences may exist in certain subgroups defined by age, sex, and/or FSIQ. The type of TBV adjustment influenced some reported volumetric and scaling group differences. This study supports the absence of robust volumetric differences between ASD and TD individuals in the investigated volumes when adjusting for brain allometry, expands the literature by finding no group difference in allometric scaling, and further suggests that differing TBV adjustments contribute to the variability of reported neuroanatomical differences in ASD.
研究自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 皮质下相关性的研究结果存在差异,可能源于样本量小、样本异质性以及忽略或线性调整总脑体积 (TBV)。为了正确调整 TBV,当检查正常发育 (TD) 和 ASD 个体之间的皮质下容积差异时,考虑了脑比例关系——区域体积与 TBV 之间的非线性缩放关系。使用两种方法对自闭症脑成像数据交换 I (ABIDE I; N = 654) 数据进行了分析:单变量线性混合效应模型和多变量多组验证性因子分析。对整个样本以及基于年龄、性别和全量表智商 (FSIQ) 的子样本进行了分析。对类似的 ABIDE I 研究进行了复制,并研究了不同 TBV 调整对神经解剖组差异的影响。在整个样本中,使用不同方法均未观察到稳健的皮质下比例或容积组差异。探索性分析表明,在某些由年龄、性别和/或 FSIQ 定义的亚组中,可能存在比例缩放和体积组差异。TBV 调整的类型影响了一些报告的体积和比例组差异。这项研究支持在调整脑比例关系时,在研究的体积中,ASD 和 TD 个体之间没有稳健的体积差异,通过发现比例缩放无组间差异扩展了文献,并进一步表明,不同的 TBV 调整导致 ASD 中报告的神经解剖差异的可变性。