• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Nonoperative Management Using Antibiotic Therapy vs Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Treatment Success and Disability Days in Children With Uncomplicated Appendicitis.抗生素治疗与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗儿童单纯性阑尾炎的疗效和残疾天数的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 11;324(6):581-593. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10888.
2
3
Effectiveness of Patient Choice in Nonoperative vs Surgical Management of Pediatric Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis.患者选择对小儿非手术与手术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的疗效影响。
JAMA Surg. 2016 May 1;151(5):408-15. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4534.
4
Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的比较:APPAC 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2340-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6154.
5
Effects of a Patient Activation Tool on Decision Making Between Surgery and Nonoperative Management for Pediatric Appendicitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者激活工具对小儿阑尾炎手术与非手术治疗决策的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195009. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5009.
6
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With the Failure of Nonoperative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.与儿童单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗失败相关的人口统计学和临床特征:一项非随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e229712. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9712.
7
Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.APPAC 随机临床试验中单纯性急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗的 5 年随访。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1259-1265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13201.
8
It's time to deconstruct treatment-failure: A randomized controlled trial of nonoperative management of uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis with antibiotics alone.是时候解构治疗失败了:一项抗生素单独治疗单纯性儿童阑尾炎的非手术管理的随机对照试验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jan;57(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.09.024. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Feasibility of a nonoperative management strategy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.儿童单纯性急性阑尾炎非手术治疗策略的可行性
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Aug;219(2):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.031. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
10
Effect of Oral Moxifloxacin vs Intravenous Ertapenem Plus Oral Levofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC II Randomized Clinical Trial.口服莫西沙星对比静脉注射厄他培南加口服左氧氟沙星治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的效果:APPAC II 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):353-362. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23525.

引用本文的文献

1
The occurrence of appendicitis varies according to latitudes and seasons: A French national retrospective study.阑尾炎的发病率因纬度和季节而异:一项法国全国性回顾性研究。
Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 29;9(4):e412. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000412. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
National Trends in Hospitalizations for Appendectomy in Children, 2001-2017.2001 - 2017年儿童阑尾切除术住院治疗的全国趋势
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2025 May 30;53(3):122-131. doi: 10.4274/TJAR.2025.241755. Epub 2025 May 16.
3
Discriminatory Value and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model Based on Serum Cytokines in Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: A Single-Center Experience of 483 Cases.基于血清细胞因子的小儿急性阑尾炎风险预测模型的判别价值及验证:483例单中心经验
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 27;12(3):298. doi: 10.3390/children12030298.
4
Efficacy of non-operative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: initial experience in a resource-limited setting.非复杂性急性阑尾炎非手术治疗的疗效:资源有限环境下的初步经验
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Mar 3;9(1):e003141. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003141.
5
Management and outcomes of acute appendicitis in children with congenital heart disease.先天性心脏病儿童急性阑尾炎的治疗与结局。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Oct 24;40(1):273. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05864-0.
6
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy.内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 24;17:17562848241275314. doi: 10.1177/17562848241275314. eCollection 2024.
7
Systemic immune-inflammation index combined with pediatric appendicitis score in assessing the severity and prognosis for paediatric appendicitis.全身免疫炎症指数联合小儿阑尾炎评分在评估小儿阑尾炎严重程度及预后中的应用
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):2565-2573. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2565.
8
Stumped by a Case of Appendicitis After Appendectomy.阑尾切除术后阑尾炎病例难倒众人。
Ochsner J. 2024 Summer;24(2):147-150. doi: 10.31486/toj.23.0098.
9
Controversies and Future Directions in Management of Acute Appendicitis: An Updated Comprehensive Review.急性阑尾炎管理中的争议与未来方向:最新综合综述
J Clin Med. 2024 May 22;13(11):3034. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113034.
10
Applying an explainable machine learning model might reduce the number of negative appendectomies in pediatric patients with a high probability of acute appendicitis.应用可解释的机器学习模型可能会减少高概率患有急性阑尾炎的儿科患者的阴性阑尾切除术数量。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 4;14(1):12772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63513-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Parental preferences in treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis comparing surgery to conservative management with antibiotics and their views on research participation.父母在急性单纯性阑尾炎治疗中的偏好,比较手术与抗生素保守治疗及其对研究参与的看法。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 May;179(5):735-742. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03555-w. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
2
Multi-institutional trial of non-operative management and surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: Design and rationale.多机构合作研究儿童单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗与手术治疗的比较:设计与原理。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;83:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Effects of a Patient Activation Tool on Decision Making Between Surgery and Nonoperative Management for Pediatric Appendicitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者激活工具对小儿阑尾炎手术与非手术治疗决策的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195009. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5009.
4
Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.APPAC 随机临床试验中单纯性急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗的 5 年随访。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1259-1265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13201.
5
Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial: a protocol for the pragmatic randomised study of appendicitis treatment.抗生素与阑尾切除术疗效比较(CODA)试验:一项关于阑尾炎治疗的实用随机研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e016117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016117.
6
Expanding the inclusion criteria for nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis: Outcomes and cost.扩大单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗的纳入标准:疗效与成本
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.014.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Nonoperative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis.急性阑尾炎非手术治疗的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2017 Mar;139(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3003. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
8
Antibiotics-First Versus Surgery for Appendicitis: A US Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Allowing Outpatient Antibiotic Management.阑尾炎的抗生素优先治疗与手术治疗:一项允许门诊抗生素管理的美国试点随机对照试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;70(1):1-11.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.446. Epub 2016 Dec 11.
9
Comments on propensity score matching following multiple imputation.多次插补后倾向得分匹配的评论
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Dec;25(6):3066-3068. doi: 10.1177/0962280216674296.
10
Effectiveness of Patient Choice in Nonoperative vs Surgical Management of Pediatric Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis.患者选择对小儿非手术与手术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的疗效影响。
JAMA Surg. 2016 May 1;151(5):408-15. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4534.

抗生素治疗与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗儿童单纯性阑尾炎的疗效和残疾天数的关系。

Association of Nonoperative Management Using Antibiotic Therapy vs Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Treatment Success and Disability Days in Children With Uncomplicated Appendicitis.

机构信息

Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

JAMA. 2020 Aug 11;324(6):581-593. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10888.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.10888
PMID:32730561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7385674/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Nonoperative management with antibiotics alone has the potential to treat uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis with fewer disability days than surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the success rate of nonoperative management and compare differences in treatment-related disability, satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and complications between nonoperative management and surgery in children with uncomplicated appendicitis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multi-institutional nonrandomized controlled intervention study of 1068 children aged 7 through 17 years with uncomplicated appendicitis treated at 10 tertiary children's hospitals across 7 US states between May 2015 and October 2018 with 1-year follow-up through October 2019. Of the 1209 eligible patients approached, 1068 enrolled in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patient and family selection of nonoperative management with antibiotics alone (nonoperative group, n = 370) or urgent (≤12 hours of admission) laparoscopic appendectomy (surgery group, n = 698).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 2 primary outcomes assessed at 1 year were disability days, defined as the total number of days the child was not able to participate in all of his/her normal activities secondary to appendicitis-related care (expected difference, 5 days), and success rate of nonoperative management, defined as the proportion of patients initially managed nonoperatively who did not undergo appendectomy by 1 year (lowest acceptable success rate, ≥70%). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for differences between treatment groups for all outcome assessments.

RESULTS

Among 1068 patients who were enrolled (median age, 12.4 years; 38% girls), 370 (35%) chose nonoperative management and 698 (65%) chose surgery. A total of 806 (75%) had complete follow-up: 284 (77%) in the nonoperative group; 522 (75%) in the surgery group. Patients in the nonoperative group were more often younger (median age, 12.3 years vs 12.5 years), Black (9.6% vs 4.9%) or other race (14.6% vs 8.7%), had caregivers with a bachelor's degree (29.8% vs 23.5%), and underwent diagnostic ultrasound (79.7% vs 74.5%). After IPTW, the success rate of nonoperative management at 1 year was 67.1% (96% CI, 61.5%-72.31%; P = .86). Nonoperative management was associated with significantly fewer patient disability days at 1 year than did surgery (adjusted mean, 6.6 vs 10.9 days; mean difference, -4.3 days (99% CI, -6.17 to -2.43; P < .001). Of 16 other prespecified secondary end points, 10 showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Among children with uncomplicated appendicitis, an initial nonoperative management strategy with antibiotics alone had a success rate of 67.1% and, compared with urgent surgery, was associated with statistically significantly fewer disability days at 1 year. However, there was substantial loss to follow-up, the comparison with the prespecified threshold for an acceptable success rate of nonoperative management was not statistically significant, and the hypothesized difference in disability days was not met.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02271932.

摘要

重要性

单纯使用抗生素的非手术治疗有可能治疗单纯性小儿阑尾炎,使残疾天数少于手术。

目的

确定非手术治疗的成功率,并比较单纯性阑尾炎患儿非手术治疗与手术治疗在治疗相关残疾、满意度、健康相关生活质量和并发症方面的差异。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多机构非随机对照干预研究,纳入了 2015 年 5 月至 2018 年 10 月在 7 个美国州的 10 家三级儿童医院接受治疗的 1068 名 7 至 17 岁的单纯性阑尾炎患儿,随访 1 年,直至 2019 年 10 月。在 1209 名符合条件的患者中,有 1068 名患者入组了该研究。

干预措施

患者和家属选择单纯使用抗生素的非手术治疗(非手术组,n=370)或紧急(入院后≤12 小时)腹腔镜阑尾切除术(手术组,n=698)。

主要结果和测量

1 年时评估的 2 个主要结果是残疾天数,定义为因阑尾炎相关护理而无法参加所有正常活动的儿童的总天数(预期差异为 5 天);非手术治疗的成功率,定义为最初接受非手术治疗的患者在 1 年内未行阑尾切除术的比例(最低可接受的成功率≥70%)。所有结局评估均采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)来调整治疗组之间的差异。

结果

在 1068 名入组的患者中(中位年龄 12.4 岁;38%为女孩),370 名(35%)选择非手术治疗,698 名(65%)选择手术治疗。共有 806 名(75%)患者完成了完整的随访:非手术组 284 名(77%);手术组 522 名(75%)。非手术组患者更常为年龄较小者(中位年龄 12.3 岁 vs 12.5 岁)、黑种人(9.6% vs 4.9%)或其他种族(14.6% vs 8.7%)、照顾者具有学士学位(29.8% vs 23.5%)、接受了超声诊断(79.7% vs 74.5%)。经过 IPTW,1 年时非手术治疗的成功率为 67.1%(96% CI,61.5%-72.31%;P=.86)。与手术相比,非手术治疗在 1 年内与显著较少的患者残疾天数相关(调整后的平均残疾天数,6.6 天 vs 10.9 天;平均差异,-4.3 天(99% CI,-6.17 至-2.43;P<0.001)。在 16 个其他预先指定的次要终点中,有 10 个没有显著差异。

结论和相关性

在单纯性阑尾炎患儿中,初始单纯使用抗生素的非手术治疗策略成功率为 67.1%,与紧急手术相比,1 年内的残疾天数显著减少。然而,失访率较高,与非手术治疗可接受成功率的预定阈值相比,没有统计学意义,且假设的残疾天数差异未达到。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02271932。