Slavin Masha J, Rajan Mangala, Kern Lisa M
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 30;20(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02177-3.
Relevant clinical information is often missing when a patient sees a specialist after being referred by another physician in the ambulatory setting. This can result in missed or delayed diagnoses, delayed treatment, unnecessary testing, and drug interactions. Residents' attitudes toward providing clinical information at the time of referral and their perspectives toward training on referral skills are not clear. We sought to assess internal medicine residents' attitudes toward and experiences with outpatient referrals.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey in October-December 2018 of all internal medicine interns and residents affiliated with a large, urban internal medicine residency program in New York, NY. We used a novel survey instrument that included 13 questions about attitudes toward and experiences with outpatient referrals. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the results.
Overall, 122 of 132 residents participated (92% response rate). Respondents were approximately equally distributed across post-graduate years 1-3. Although 83% of residents reported that it is "always" important to provide the clinical reason for a referral, only 11% stated that they "always" provide a sufficient amount of clinical information for the consulting provider when making a referral. Only 9% of residents "strongly agree" that residency provides sufficient training in knowing when to refer patients, and only 8% "strongly agree" that residency provides sufficient training in what information to provide the consulting physician.
These results suggest a substantial discrepancy between the amount of information residents believe they should provide at the time of a referral and the amount they actually provide. Many residents report not receiving adequate training during residency on when to refer patients and what clinical information to provide at the time of referral. Improvements to medical education regarding outpatient referrals are urgently needed.
在门诊环境中,患者经另一位医生转诊后看专科医生时,相关临床信息常常缺失。这可能导致诊断遗漏或延迟、治疗延误、不必要的检查以及药物相互作用。住院医师在转诊时提供临床信息的态度以及他们对转诊技能培训的看法尚不清楚。我们旨在评估内科住院医师对门诊转诊的态度和经历。
2018年10月至12月,我们对纽约市一个大型城市内科住院医师培训项目的所有内科实习医生和住院医师进行了横断面调查。我们使用了一种新颖的调查问卷,其中包括13个关于门诊转诊态度和经历的问题。我们使用描述性统计来描述结果。
总体而言,132名住院医师中有122名参与调查(应答率为92%)。受访者在研究生1至3年级中的分布大致均匀。尽管83%的住院医师报告说提供转诊的临床原因“总是”很重要,但只有11%的人表示他们在转诊时“总是”为会诊医生提供足够的临床信息。只有9%的住院医师“强烈同意”住院医师培训在知道何时转诊患者方面提供了足够的培训,只有8%的人“强烈同意”住院医师培训在提供给会诊医生什么信息方面提供了足够的培训。
这些结果表明,住院医师认为他们在转诊时应提供的信息量与他们实际提供的信息量之间存在很大差异。许多住院医师报告说,在住院医师培训期间,没有接受关于何时转诊患者以及在转诊时提供什么临床信息的充分培训。迫切需要改进关于门诊转诊的医学教育。