Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Aug;24(8):904-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1015-8. Epub 2009 May 28.
Internal medicine ambulatory training redesign, including recommendations to increase ambulatory training, is a focus of national discussion. Residents' and program directors' perceptions about ambulatory training models are unknown.
To describe internal medicine residents' and program directors' perceptions regarding ambulatory training duration, alternative ambulatory training models, and factors important for ambulatory education.
National cohort study.
Internal medicine residents (N = 14,941) and program directors (N = 222) who completed the 2007 Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) Residents Questionnaire or Program Directors Survey, representing 389 US residency programs.
A total of 58.4% of program directors and 43.7% of residents preferred one-third or more training time in outpatient settings. Resident preferences for one-third or more outpatient training increased with higher levels of training (48.3% PGY3), female sex (52.7%), primary care program enrollment (64.8%), and anticipated outpatient-focused career, such as geriatrics. Most program directors (77.3%) and residents (58.4%) preferred training models containing weekly clinic. Although residents and program directors reported problems with competing inpatient-outpatient responsibilities (74.9% and 88.1%, respectively) and felt that absence of conflict with inpatient responsibilities is important for good outpatient training (69.4% and 74.2%, respectively), only 41.6% of residents and 22.7% of program directors supported models eliminating ambulatory sessions during inpatient rotations.
Residents' and program directors' preferences for outpatient training differ from recommendations for increased ambulatory training. Discordance was observed between reported problems with conflicting inpatient-outpatient responsibilities and preferences for models maintaining longitudinal clinic during inpatient rotations. Further study regarding benefits and barriers of ambulatory redesign is needed.
内科门诊培训的重新设计,包括增加门诊培训的建议,是全国讨论的重点。内科住院医师和项目主任对门诊培训模式的看法尚不清楚。
描述内科住院医师和项目主任对门诊培训时间、替代门诊培训模式以及对门诊教育重要的因素的看法。
全国队列研究。
完成 2007 年内科住院医师在培训考试(IM-ITE)住院医师问卷或项目主任调查的内科住院医师(N=14941)和项目主任(N=222),代表 389 个美国住院医师培训计划。
共有 58.4%的项目主任和 43.7%的住院医师更喜欢三分之一或更多的培训时间在门诊环境中。住院医师对三分之一或更多门诊培训的偏好随着培训水平的提高而增加(PGY3 为 48.3%)、女性(52.7%)、初级保健项目入学(64.8%)和预期的以门诊为重点的职业,如老年医学。大多数项目主任(77.3%)和住院医师(58.4%)更喜欢包含每周诊所的培训模式。尽管住院医师和项目主任报告说存在与住院和门诊职责竞争的问题(分别为 74.9%和 88.1%),并且认为与住院职责没有冲突对于良好的门诊培训很重要(分别为 69.4%和 74.2%),但只有 41.6%的住院医师和 22.7%的项目主任支持消除住院轮转期间门诊课程的模式。
住院医师和项目主任对门诊培训的偏好与增加门诊培训的建议不同。报告的与住院和门诊职责冲突相关的问题与对在住院轮转期间保持纵向诊所的模式的偏好之间存在差异。需要进一步研究门诊重新设计的益处和障碍。