Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Jan;29(1):20-28. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0702-0. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
Dutch genome diagnostic centers (GDC) use next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based diagnostic applications for the diagnosis of primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs). The interpretation of genetic variants in many PIDs is complicated because of the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. To analyze uniformity of variant filtering, interpretation, and reporting in NGS-based diagnostics for PID, an external quality assessment was performed. Four main Dutch GDCs participated in the quality assessment. Unannotated variant call format (VCF) files of two PID patient analyses per laboratory were distributed among the four GDCs, analyzed, and interpreted (eight analyses in total). Variants that would be reported to the clinician and/or advised for further investigation were compared between the centers. A survey measuring the experiences of clinical laboratory geneticists was part of the study. Analysis of samples with confirmed diagnoses showed that all centers reported at least the variants classified as likely pathogenic (LP) or pathogenic (P) variants in all samples, except for variants in two genes (PSTPIP1 and BTK). The absence of clinical information complicated correct classification of variants. In this external quality assessment, the final interpretation and conclusions of the genetic analyses were uniform among the four participating genetic centers. Clinical and immunological data provided by a medical specialist are required to be able to draw proper conclusions from genetic data.
荷兰基因组诊断中心(GDC)使用基于下一代测序(NGS)的诊断应用程序来诊断原发性免疫缺陷症(PID)。由于表型和遗传异质性,许多 PID 中的遗传变异的解释很复杂。为了分析基于 NGS 的 PID 诊断中变异过滤、解释和报告的一致性,进行了一项外部质量评估。四个主要的荷兰 GDC 参与了质量评估。每个实验室的两个 PID 患者分析的未注释的变体调用格式(VCF)文件在四个 GDC 之间进行了分发、分析和解释(总共进行了 8 次分析)。对中心之间的变体进行了比较,这些变体将报告给临床医生和/或建议进一步调查。一项衡量临床实验室遗传学家经验的调查是该研究的一部分。对具有确诊诊断的样本的分析表明,除了两个基因(PSTPIP1 和 BTK)中的变体外,所有中心都报告了所有样本中至少被归类为可能致病性(LP)或致病性(P)的变体,除非是没有临床信息,这使得正确分类变异变得复杂。在这项外部质量评估中,四个参与的遗传中心对遗传分析的最终解释和结论是一致的。需要临床专家提供临床和免疫学数据,以便能够从遗传数据中得出适当的结论。