Centre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Department of Education Development and Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Med Teach. 2021 Jan;43(1):44-49. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795100. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are a dominant, yet problematic, assessment tool across health professions education (HPE). OSCEs' standardised approach aligns with regulatory accountability, allowing learners to exchange exam success for the right to practice. We offer a sociohistorical account of OSCEs' development to support an interpretation of present assessment practices. OSCEs create tensions. Preparing for OSCE success diverts students away from the complexity of authentic clinical environments. Students will not qualify and will, therefore, be of no use to patients without getting marks providing evidence of competence. Performing in a formulaic and often non patient-centred way is the price to pay for a qualification. Acknowledging the stultifying effect of standardising human behaviour for OSCEs opens up possibilities to release latent energy for change in medical education. In this imagined future, the overall object of education is refocused on patient care.
客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是一种在健康职业教育(HPE)中占据主导地位但存在问题的评估工具。OSCE 的标准化方法符合监管问责制,使学习者能够将考试成功转化为实践的权利。我们提供了 OSCE 发展的社会历史叙述,以支持对当前评估实践的解释。OSCE 造成了紧张局势。为 OSCE 的成功做准备使学生远离真实临床环境的复杂性。如果没有获得证明能力的分数,学生将没有资格,对患者也毫无用处。以公式化且通常不以患者为中心的方式进行表演是获得资格的代价。承认 OSCE 标准化人类行为的僵化效果为医学教育的变革释放潜在能量开辟了可能性。在这个想象的未来,教育的总体目标重新聚焦于患者护理。