Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Phys Med. 2020 Aug;76:243-276. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
The use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for performing dose calculations in radiation therapy has been widely investigated as it could provide a quantitative analysis of the dosimetric impact of changes in patients during the treatment. The aim of this review was to classify different techniques adopted to perform CBCT dose calculation and to report their dosimetric accuracy with respect to the metrics used.
A literature search was carried out in PubMed and ScienceDirect databases, based upon the following keywords: "cone beam computed tomography", "CBCT", "cone beam CT", "dose calculation", "accuracy". Sixty-nine peer-reviewed relevant articles were included in this review: thirty-one patient studies, fifteen phantom studies and twenty-three patient & phantom studies. Most studies were found to have focused on head and neck, lung and prostate cancers.
The techniques adopted to perform CBCT dose calculation have been grouped in six categories labelled as (1) pCT calibration, (2) CBCT calibration, (3) HU override, (4) Deformable image registration, (5) Dose deformation, and (6) Combined techniques. Differences between CBCT dose and reference dose were reported both for target volumes and OARs.
A comparison among the available techniques for CBCT dose calculations is challenging as many variables are involved. Therefore, a set of reporting standards is recommended to enable meaningful comparisons among different studies. The accuracy of the results was strongly dependent on the image quality, regardless of the methods used, highlighting the need for dose validation and quality assurance standards.
锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)在放射治疗中用于剂量计算已得到广泛研究,因为它可以对治疗过程中患者变化的剂量学影响进行定量分析。本综述的目的是对用于执行 CBCT 剂量计算的不同技术进行分类,并根据使用的指标报告其剂量学准确性。
在 PubMed 和 ScienceDirect 数据库中进行了文献检索,使用的关键词为:“锥形束计算机断层扫描”、“CBCT”、“锥形束 CT”、“剂量计算”、“准确性”。本综述共纳入 69 篇同行评审的相关文章:31 项患者研究、15 项体模研究和 23 项患者和体模研究。大多数研究集中于头颈部、肺部和前列腺癌。
用于执行 CBCT 剂量计算的技术可分为六类,分别为:(1)pCT 校准;(2)CBCT 校准;(3)HU 覆盖;(4)变形图像配准;(5)剂量变形;(6)联合技术。在靶区和 OAR 中均报告了 CBCT 剂量与参考剂量之间的差异。
由于涉及许多变量,因此比较 CBCT 剂量计算的现有技术具有挑战性。因此,建议制定一套报告标准,以实现不同研究之间的有意义比较。无论使用何种方法,结果的准确性都强烈依赖于图像质量,这突出了剂量验证和质量保证标准的必要性。