• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种防腐剂涂料是否有助于安全准备手术区域?一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入 239 例患者。

Are three antiseptic paints needed for safe preparation of the surgical field? A prospective cohort study with 239 patients.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jul 31;9(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00780-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-020-00780-z
PMID:32736650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7393917/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative skin antisepsis is an essential component of safe surgery. However, it is unclear how many antiseptic paints are needed to eliminate bacteria prior to incision. This study compared microbial skin counts after two and three antiseptic paints.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study in non-emergency patients receiving a cardiac/abdominal surgery with standardized, preoperative skin antisepsis consisting of an alcoholic compound and either povidone iodine (PI) or chlorhexidine (CHX). We obtained three skin swabs from the participant's thorax/abdomen using a sterile template with a 25 cm window: After collection of the first swab prior to skin antisepsis, and once the second and third application of PI/CHX had dried out, we obtained a second and third swab, respectively. Our primary outcome was the reduction in microbial skin counts after two and three paints of PI/CHX.

RESULTS

Among the 239 enrolled patients, there was no significant difference in the reduction of mean square root-transformed microbial skin counts with three versus two paints (P = 0.2). But distributions of colony forming units (CFUs) decreased from paint 2 to 3 in a predefined analysis (P = 0.002). There was strong evidence of an increased proportion of patients with zero CFU after paint 3 versus paint 2 (P = 0.003). We did not identify risk factors for insufficient reduction of microbial skin counts after two paints, defined as the detection of > 5 CFUs and/or ≥ 1 pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-emergency surgical patients, three antiseptic paints may be superior to two paints in reducing microbial skin colonization prior to surgery.

摘要

背景

术前皮肤消毒是安全手术的重要组成部分。然而,目前尚不清楚在切口前需要使用多少种抗菌涂料来消除细菌。本研究比较了使用两种和三种抗菌涂料后微生物皮肤计数的情况。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了接受心脏/腹部手术的非紧急患者,术前皮肤消毒采用标准化的酒精制剂和聚维酮碘(PI)或洗必泰(CHX)。我们使用带有 25cm 窗口的无菌模板从患者的胸部/腹部获得三个皮肤拭子:在进行 PI/CHX 的第一次皮肤消毒前收集第一个拭子后,以及在 PI/CHX 的第二次和第三次应用干燥后,分别获得第二个和第三个拭子。我们的主要结局是使用 PI/CHX 进行两次和三次涂药后微生物皮肤计数的减少。

结果

在 239 名入组患者中,使用三种涂料与两种涂料相比,平均平方根转化后的微生物皮肤计数减少没有显著差异(P=0.2)。但是,在预先定义的分析中,菌落形成单位(CFU)的分布从第二次涂药到第三次涂药减少(P=0.002)。有强有力的证据表明,与第二次涂药相比,第三次涂药后 CFU 为零的患者比例增加(P=0.003)。我们没有发现导致两次涂药后微生物皮肤计数减少不足(定义为检测到>5CFU 和/或≥1种病原体)的危险因素。

结论

在非紧急手术患者中,与使用两种抗菌涂料相比,使用三种抗菌涂料可能在手术前更能减少皮肤微生物定植。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb6/7393917/db8940c7120a/13756_2020_780_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb6/7393917/8c051d6d070c/13756_2020_780_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb6/7393917/db8940c7120a/13756_2020_780_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb6/7393917/8c051d6d070c/13756_2020_780_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb6/7393917/db8940c7120a/13756_2020_780_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Are three antiseptic paints needed for safe preparation of the surgical field? A prospective cohort study with 239 patients.三种防腐剂涂料是否有助于安全准备手术区域?一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入 239 例患者。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jul 31;9(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00780-z.
2
Preoperative skin antisepsis using chlorhexidine may reduce surgical wound infections in lower limb trauma surgery when compared to povidone-iodine - a prospective randomized trial.与聚维酮碘相比,术前使用氯己定进行皮肤消毒可能会降低下肢创伤手术的手术伤口感染率——一项前瞻性随机试验。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Feb;48(2):167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
3
Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.外科手消毒以减少手术部位感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD004288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004288.pub2.
4
Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial.酒精(70%)与含 0.5%氯己定的酒精溶液在椎管内阻滞皮肤消毒中的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021 Jan 13;48:e20202633. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202633. eCollection 2021.
5
Bacterial recolonization during foot surgery: a prospective randomized study of toe preparation techniques.足部手术期间的细菌再定植:一项关于趾部准备技术的前瞻性随机研究。
Foot Ankle Int. 2001 Apr;22(4):347-50. doi: 10.1177/107110070102200415.
6
Preoperative skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine: a prospective analysis of 6959 consecutive spinal surgery patients.术前皮肤消毒用葡萄糖酸洗必泰和聚维酮碘的比较:6959 例连续脊柱手术患者的前瞻性分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Feb;28(2):209-214. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE17158. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
7
Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine versus iodine for the prevention of surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.氯己定与碘用于皮肤消毒预防手术部位感染的系统评价与Meta分析
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.09.017. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Pre-Operative Antisepsis Protocol Compliance and the Effect on Bacterial Load Reduction.术前抗菌方案的依从性及其对细菌载量降低的影响。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Feb;17(1):32-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.107. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
9
Evaluation of surgical scrub and antiseptic solutions for surgical preparation of canine paws.用于犬爪手术准备的外科刷手及消毒剂溶液的评估
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991 Jun 1;198(11):1941-5.
10
Bacterial skin recolonization in the operating room: comparison between various antisepsis protocols.手术室皮肤细菌再定植:各种消毒方案的比较。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Sep;106(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcutaneous Absorption of Iodine in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Following the Topical Use of Povidone Iodine.聚维酮碘局部应用于小儿心脏手术后碘的经皮吸收
ARYA Atheroscler. 2022 May;18(5):2683. doi: 10.48305/arya.2022.11861.2683. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Association between the introduction of a national targeted intervention program and the incidence of surgical site infections in Swiss acute care hospitals.瑞士急性护理医院中全国性靶向干预计划的引入与手术部位感染发生率之间的关联。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Nov 24;12(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01336-7.
3
Transitory Shifts in Skin Microbiota Composition and Reductions in Bacterial Load and Psoriasin following Ethanol Perturbation.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequent Door Openings During Cardiac Surgery Are Associated With Increased Risk for Surgical Site Infection: A Prospective Observational Study.心脏手术过程中频繁开门与手术部位感染风险增加相关:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 2;69(2):290-294. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy879.
2
Adhering to a national surgical care bundle reduces the risk of surgical site infections.坚持国家外科护理综合措施可降低手术部位感染的风险。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0184200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184200. eCollection 2017.
3
First Results of the Swiss National Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Program: Who Seeks Shall Find.
乙醇干扰后皮肤微生物组组成的短暂变化及细菌负荷和菌样丝氨酸蛋白酶减少。
mSphere. 2022 Aug 31;7(4):e0017122. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00171-22. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
瑞士国家手术部位感染监测项目的初步结果:有志者事竟成。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):697-704. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.55.
4
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.美国疾病预防控制中心 2017 年《手术部位感染预防指南》。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.
5
Simplifying the WHO 'how to hand rub' technique: three steps are as effective as six-results from an experimental randomized crossover trial.简化世卫组织“如何进行手卫生”技术:三步骤与六步骤同样有效——一项实验性随机交叉试验结果。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Jun;23(6):409.e1-409.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.030. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
6
New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective.世界卫生组织关于手术部位感染预防的术中及术后措施新建议:基于证据的全球视角。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;16(12):e288-e303. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Burden of Six Healthcare-Associated Infections on European Population Health: Estimating Incidence-Based Disability-Adjusted Life Years through a Population Prevalence-Based Modelling Study.六种医疗保健相关感染对欧洲人群健康的负担:通过基于人群患病率的建模研究估算基于发病率的伤残调整生命年
PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002150. eCollection 2016 Oct.
8
Skin preparation before surgery: options and evidence.手术前的皮肤准备:选择与证据
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Feb;16(1):14-23. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.010.
9
Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system.医疗保健相关感染:对美国医疗保健系统成本和财务影响的荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2039-46. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763.
10
Preoperative skin antiseptic preparations for preventing surgical site infections: a systematic review.术前皮肤抗菌制剂预防手术部位感染:系统评价。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;33(6):608-17. doi: 10.1086/665723. Epub 2012 Apr 16.